Free: Contests & Raffles.
Quote from: Bob33 on December 04, 2016, 12:02:01 PMI'll start a GoFundMe account for Bobcat's defenseThanks Bob33. If you don't see me online for a while you know why.
I'll start a GoFundMe account for Bobcat's defense
Quote from: jay.sharkbait on December 04, 2016, 10:06:58 AMQuote from: Lefthook on December 04, 2016, 09:56:52 AMQuote from: Jonathan_S on December 04, 2016, 09:23:19 AMQuote from: Lefthook on December 04, 2016, 08:40:54 AMQuote from: greenhead_killer on December 03, 2016, 11:28:41 PMYou're grasping at straws lefthook. 100% legal bull. Pass if you want, no way I would thoughI would say letting an animal live is about as far away from grasping at straws as there is.With your logic, every animal I have passed on was a straw game.My decision to kill something I am comfortable with has to do with ethics and my personal approach to hunting. I'll let it walk, someone else can kill it.So now it's ethics. That's good because your first post on the subject was factually incorrect.If it's legal, kill it.I unfortunately can not make a measurement in the field with in fractions of an inch so I believe it is not a legal kill, using the eyes and judgement which I have been given. I have read posts all over this forum (not this thread) calling 3x3 elk "spikes" because they, for some reason, don't believe eye guards count as points.My ethical statement is because that bull is nowhere near the spirit of spike only. There is no point in me killing a bull that no way resembles a spike except for an eye guard being possibly 4 inches or so from the base of his right beam and the only way to have a definite answer is to kill it and measure it. I wonder how many "hunters" on here would shoot it, measure the distance from the base and find out it is not legal then walk away from it. Or kill it, finding out later it is not a legal kill and then try to sneak it out of the woods. The two previous statements I find unethical.Because I wouldn't harvest the animal does not mean that others can't.Fire at will.Bob must not think it's legal or there would be a picture of it dead and tagged posted here. If that bull has been harvested and not posted here there could be an issue with it once a measurement was made. We'll see if that bull, dead, get's posted.So you are saying if Bobcat doesn't post pictures then he's a possible poacher?You're kidding right?
Quote from: Lefthook on December 04, 2016, 09:56:52 AMQuote from: Jonathan_S on December 04, 2016, 09:23:19 AMQuote from: Lefthook on December 04, 2016, 08:40:54 AMQuote from: greenhead_killer on December 03, 2016, 11:28:41 PMYou're grasping at straws lefthook. 100% legal bull. Pass if you want, no way I would thoughI would say letting an animal live is about as far away from grasping at straws as there is.With your logic, every animal I have passed on was a straw game.My decision to kill something I am comfortable with has to do with ethics and my personal approach to hunting. I'll let it walk, someone else can kill it.So now it's ethics. That's good because your first post on the subject was factually incorrect.If it's legal, kill it.I unfortunately can not make a measurement in the field with in fractions of an inch so I believe it is not a legal kill, using the eyes and judgement which I have been given. I have read posts all over this forum (not this thread) calling 3x3 elk "spikes" because they, for some reason, don't believe eye guards count as points.My ethical statement is because that bull is nowhere near the spirit of spike only. There is no point in me killing a bull that no way resembles a spike except for an eye guard being possibly 4 inches or so from the base of his right beam and the only way to have a definite answer is to kill it and measure it. I wonder how many "hunters" on here would shoot it, measure the distance from the base and find out it is not legal then walk away from it. Or kill it, finding out later it is not a legal kill and then try to sneak it out of the woods. The two previous statements I find unethical.Because I wouldn't harvest the animal does not mean that others can't.Fire at will.Bob must not think it's legal or there would be a picture of it dead and tagged posted here. If that bull has been harvested and not posted here there could be an issue with it once a measurement was made. We'll see if that bull, dead, get's posted.So you are saying if Bobcat doesn't post pictures then he's a possible poacher?You're kidding right?
Quote from: Jonathan_S on December 04, 2016, 09:23:19 AMQuote from: Lefthook on December 04, 2016, 08:40:54 AMQuote from: greenhead_killer on December 03, 2016, 11:28:41 PMYou're grasping at straws lefthook. 100% legal bull. Pass if you want, no way I would thoughI would say letting an animal live is about as far away from grasping at straws as there is.With your logic, every animal I have passed on was a straw game.My decision to kill something I am comfortable with has to do with ethics and my personal approach to hunting. I'll let it walk, someone else can kill it.So now it's ethics. That's good because your first post on the subject was factually incorrect.If it's legal, kill it.I unfortunately can not make a measurement in the field with in fractions of an inch so I believe it is not a legal kill, using the eyes and judgement which I have been given. I have read posts all over this forum (not this thread) calling 3x3 elk "spikes" because they, for some reason, don't believe eye guards count as points.My ethical statement is because that bull is nowhere near the spirit of spike only. There is no point in me killing a bull that no way resembles a spike except for an eye guard being possibly 4 inches or so from the base of his right beam and the only way to have a definite answer is to kill it and measure it. I wonder how many "hunters" on here would shoot it, measure the distance from the base and find out it is not legal then walk away from it. Or kill it, finding out later it is not a legal kill and then try to sneak it out of the woods. The two previous statements I find unethical.Because I wouldn't harvest the animal does not mean that others can't.Fire at will.Bob must not think it's legal or there would be a picture of it dead and tagged posted here. If that bull has been harvested and not posted here there could be an issue with it once a measurement was made. We'll see if that bull, dead, get's posted.
Quote from: Lefthook on December 04, 2016, 08:40:54 AMQuote from: greenhead_killer on December 03, 2016, 11:28:41 PMYou're grasping at straws lefthook. 100% legal bull. Pass if you want, no way I would thoughI would say letting an animal live is about as far away from grasping at straws as there is.With your logic, every animal I have passed on was a straw game.My decision to kill something I am comfortable with has to do with ethics and my personal approach to hunting. I'll let it walk, someone else can kill it.So now it's ethics. That's good because your first post on the subject was factually incorrect.
Quote from: greenhead_killer on December 03, 2016, 11:28:41 PMYou're grasping at straws lefthook. 100% legal bull. Pass if you want, no way I would thoughI would say letting an animal live is about as far away from grasping at straws as there is.With your logic, every animal I have passed on was a straw game.My decision to kill something I am comfortable with has to do with ethics and my personal approach to hunting. I'll let it walk, someone else can kill it.
You're grasping at straws lefthook. 100% legal bull. Pass if you want, no way I would though
That 4 inch measurement regulation has always seemed so iffy. I would let it walk, how accurate could a person be when trying to measure something like that, on the fly at different angles and distances. Nock that bull down and wind up being 1/2 an inch off would be a good possibility and a bad deal. Regardless, that bull is not even close to the spirit of what a spike only hunt consists of.
.
Quote from: Lefthook on December 04, 2016, 01:11:49 PM.Under what possible logic would this bull be legal in a spike only unit?Which side are you thinking of?
Quote from: Dan-o on December 04, 2016, 01:27:43 PMQuote from: Lefthook on December 04, 2016, 01:11:49 PM.Under what possible logic would this bull be legal in a spike only unit?Which side are you thinking of?Kids, don't be so silly. A 5x5 was used as an example in this thread. Can you read FIVE by FIVE? What on earth would a 5x5 have to do with a spike thread?I don't want to go all biologist on you but........a mature bull has a well established growth pattern. The little rag horns are the Bulls most likely to have horns sticking out anywhere and everywhere. The two little rag horns are a much better example of what you will find when a questionable spike comes up, not that 5x5.I will let you guys go back to fantasy land. Cheers!
Quote from: Lefthook on December 04, 2016, 01:42:54 PMQuote from: Dan-o on December 04, 2016, 01:27:43 PMQuote from: Lefthook on December 04, 2016, 01:11:49 PM.Under what possible logic would this bull be legal in a spike only unit?Which side are you thinking of?Kids, don't be so silly. A 5x5 was used as an example in this thread. Can you read FIVE by FIVE? What on earth would a 5x5 have to do with a spike thread?I don't want to go all biologist on you but........a mature bull has a well established growth pattern. The little rag horns are the Bulls most likely to have horns sticking out anywhere and everywhere. The two little rag horns are a much better example of what you will find when a questionable spike comes up, not that 5x5.I will let you guys go back to fantasy land. Cheers!I posted the 5x5 just to show an eye guard even on a mature bull isn't 4inches from the base, therefore proving the point that bull the OP posted about is legal. Nowhere did I say my 5x5 was legal in a spike unit lol.
What kinda deer is that second pic of left hook?