collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: WDFW spent $119,500 to shoot seven wolves  (Read 9503 times)

Offline wolfbait

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 9187

Offline Bigshooter

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 6367
  • Location: Lewis Co
  • High Wide And Heavy
Re: WDFW spent $119,500 to shoot seven wolves
« Reply #1 on: December 09, 2016, 07:21:18 PM »
I wish it was cheaper but still worth every penny.
Welcome to liberal America, where the truth is condemned and facts are ignored so as not to "offend" anyone


"Borders, language, culture."

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 25030
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: WDFW spent $119,500 to shoot seven wolves
« Reply #2 on: December 09, 2016, 07:27:58 PM »
Funny how I look at that number and cringe, yet agree with Bigshooter. We should be able to shoot them on sight like coyotes and it makes me mad we don't. That said I'd pay that much to be the trigger puller.
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Offline steeleywhopper

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 1664
  • Location: Snohomish co.
Re: WDFW spent $119,500 to shoot seven wolves
« Reply #3 on: December 09, 2016, 07:30:30 PM »
Funny how they need to up our license fee's now. WDFW can kick rocks!
Politicians like Jay Inslee are the reason we have the 2nd Amendment

Offline wolfbait

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 9187
Re: WDFW spent $119,500 to shoot seven wolves
« Reply #4 on: December 09, 2016, 07:46:41 PM »
"WDFW had planned to eliminate the entire Profanity Peak pack, which was preying on cattle in the Colville National Forest. The department suspended the operation with four wolves surviving.

WDFW said the chances of attacks on livestock continuing were low because the grazing season was ending."


 Next spring/summer the new batch of pups will have experienced cow killing teachers, and WDFW can pretend to manage their wolves once agin.




"Amaroq Weiss of the Center for Biological Diversity said the money spent shooting wolves would have been better used to move cattle off grazing allotments and paying for supplemental feed.

“I think the vast majority of the public would be very supportive of doing something like that, instead of killing wolves,” she said."





Offline wheels

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2012
  • Posts: 1458
  • Location: pacific washington
Re: WDFW spent $119,500 to shoot seven wolves
« Reply #5 on: December 09, 2016, 07:55:39 PM »
could have made some money off it

Offline MtnMuley

  • Site Sponsor
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 8686
  • Location: NCW
Re: WDFW spent $119,500 to shoot seven wolves
« Reply #6 on: December 09, 2016, 07:56:34 PM »
Best $119K they've wasted in years. :tup:

Offline Wanttohuntmore

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 1956
Re: WDFW spent $119,500 to shoot seven wolves
« Reply #7 on: December 09, 2016, 08:09:50 PM »
Ha!  Yeah, the best money they have spent.   I'll offer to do the next job for half the price.   :)

Offline The100Road

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 1062
  • Location: Westside
    • https://m.facebook.com/Rowdengamecalls/
Re: WDFW spent $119,500 to shoot seven wolves
« Reply #8 on: December 09, 2016, 08:13:41 PM »
Do they realize that they could have made this a special permit or raffle and MADE a ton of money rather then it costing them $119,000?  :dunno:

Offline JimmyHoffa

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 14537
  • Location: 150 Years Too Late
Re: WDFW spent $119,500 to shoot seven wolves
« Reply #9 on: December 09, 2016, 08:28:08 PM »
Do they realize that they could have made this a special permit or raffle and MADE a ton of money rather then it costing them $119,000?  :dunno:
Wish they would.  But reality is $119K is probably a lot cheaper than the greeny lawsuits if the opened a season before delisting.

Offline timberfaller

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2014
  • Posts: 4096
  • Location: East Wenatchee
Re: WDFW spent $119,500 to shoot seven wolves
« Reply #10 on: December 27, 2016, 01:05:33 PM »
"Center for Biological Diversity"  :yike:

There they are again!! :bash: 

They are the "Center" of every "under the radar"  anti-hunting and anti 2A issue WE have to fight!

Surprise Surprise!!  NOT!!!
The only good tree, is a stump!

Offline Stein

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 12895
  • Location: Arlington
Re: WDFW spent $119,500 to shoot seven wolves
« Reply #11 on: December 27, 2016, 01:07:37 PM »
Do they realize that they could have made this a special permit or raffle and MADE a ton of money rather then it costing them $119,000?  :dunno:

You can go to MT and shoot one for $50 OTC and virtually nobody ever even tries.

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50471
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: WDFW spent $119,500 to shoot seven wolves
« Reply #12 on: December 27, 2016, 01:33:45 PM »
As stated above....Best money they have ever wasted! 

Offline Dan-o

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+30)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2010
  • Posts: 18040
Re: WDFW spent $119,500 to shoot seven wolves
« Reply #13 on: December 27, 2016, 02:18:12 PM »
 :yeah: :yeah: :yeah: :yeah:

Maybe they could cancel the 800,000 contract for their "facilitator".   

At their current rate, that would fun removal of about 50 more wolves.   
Member:   Yakstrakgutp (or whatever we are)
I love the BFRO!!!
I wonder how many people will touch their nose to their screen trying to read this...

Offline nwwanderer

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 4673
Re: WDFW spent $119,500 to shoot seven wolves
« Reply #14 on: December 27, 2016, 02:41:47 PM »
Kind of like the deer culls in the northeast cities, huge bills, never allowed to really control numbers, and they do it all again over and over. 
What was accomplished with several packs overlapping in the northeast?  Ask the Gebbers or McIrvins how effective this plan is.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Last year putting in… by Broomd
[Yesterday at 10:42:13 PM]


Knight ridge runner by riverrun
[Yesterday at 09:47:51 PM]


Anybody breeding meat rabbit? by jackelope
[Yesterday at 08:54:26 PM]


1oz cannon balls by hookr88
[Yesterday at 07:40:51 PM]


Best/Preferred Scouting App by MADMAX
[Yesterday at 06:57:28 PM]


Any info on public land South Dakota pheasant hunts? by follow maggie
[Yesterday at 05:27:14 PM]


Oregon spring bear by Twispriver
[Yesterday at 04:32:22 PM]


Search underway for three missing people after boat sinks near Mukilteo by Platensek-po
[Yesterday at 01:59:06 PM]


Desert Sheds by MADMAX
[Yesterday at 11:25:33 AM]


Nevada Results by cem3434
[Yesterday at 11:18:49 AM]


Sportsman’s Muzzloader Selection by VickGar
[May 23, 2025, 09:20:43 PM]


Vantage Bridge by jackelope
[May 23, 2025, 08:03:05 PM]


wyoming pronghorn draw by 87Ford
[May 23, 2025, 07:35:40 PM]


Wyoming elk who's in? by go4steelhd
[May 23, 2025, 03:25:16 PM]


New to ML-Optics help by Threewolves
[May 23, 2025, 02:55:25 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal