collapse

Advertisement


Poll

Should the minimum caliber rule be removed

Yes, Remove it.
19 (17.4%)
No, leave it as is
65 (59.6%)
No, but it the minimum should change
7 (6.4%)
Yes, remove it and implement a rule similar to other states that allow .224 centerfire
18 (16.5%)
Other, if you chose this option please explain why
0 (0%)

Total Members Voted: 108

Author Topic: Should the minumum caliber restriction exist?  (Read 6010 times)

Offline JJB11B

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 4496
Should the minumum caliber restriction exist?
« on: January 04, 2017, 02:12:09 PM »
I am starting this Poll to address a discrepancy in the other thread. The other thread was about changing the minimum caliber. This thread is regarding abolishing the minimum caliber rule as it is now and implementing something similar to other states that provides guidelines on firearms for big game.
"Pain heals, chicks dig scars, glory lasts forever."
Shane Falco

Offline Mongo Hunter

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 855
  • Location: Vancouver
  • Pew Pew lifestyle
Re: Should the minumum caliber restriction exist?
« Reply #1 on: January 04, 2017, 02:13:51 PM »
Type of weapon aside, we should be allowed to use what we want.
Vegetarian: Old Indian word for Bad Hunter.

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32940
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: Should the minumum caliber restriction exist?
« Reply #2 on: January 04, 2017, 02:30:25 PM »
I am starting this Poll to address a discrepancy in the other thread.

Other thread? This suggests there are only two, maybe one of the mods should "merge" them all into one since it's basically one discussion anyway. :dunno:
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline JJB11B

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 4496
Re: Should the minumum caliber restriction exist?
« Reply #3 on: January 04, 2017, 02:31:52 PM »
I am starting this Poll to address a discrepancy in the other thread.

Other thread? This suggests there are only two, maybe one of the mods should "merge" them all into one since it's basically one discussion anyway. :dunno:
no, merging them would cloud the waters, this is a clean slate
"Pain heals, chicks dig scars, glory lasts forever."
Shane Falco

Offline jackelope

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+29)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50753
  • Location: Duvall, WA
  • Groups: jackelope
Re: Should the minumum caliber restriction exist?
« Reply #4 on: January 04, 2017, 02:32:56 PM »
I am starting this Poll to address a discrepancy in the other thread.

Other thread? This suggests there are only two, maybe one of the mods should "merge" them all into one since it's basically one discussion anyway. :dunno:
no, merging them would cloud the waters, this is a clean slate

Lots of threads, all seem to have the same topic. At least close to the same anyway...

"Hate speech does not exist legally in America. There's ugly speech. There's gross speech. There's evil speech. And ALL of it is protected by the First Amendment."

Offline JJB11B

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 4496
Re: Should the minumum caliber restriction exist?
« Reply #5 on: January 04, 2017, 02:34:21 PM »
I am starting this Poll to address a discrepancy in the other thread.

Other thread? This suggests there are only two, maybe one of the mods should "merge" them all into one since it's basically one discussion anyway. :dunno:
no, merging them would cloud the waters, this is a clean slate

Lots of threads, all seem to have the same topic. At least close to the same anyway...


This thread was intended to be more subjective and a clean slate from the other ones. the options in the poll are a little better
"Pain heals, chicks dig scars, glory lasts forever."
Shane Falco

Offline jackelope

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+29)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50753
  • Location: Duvall, WA
  • Groups: jackelope
Re: Should the minumum caliber restriction exist?
« Reply #6 on: January 04, 2017, 02:36:12 PM »
The best avenue to take if you want a true taste is to lock the thread and not allow comments, but let folks vote. That way...you'll only get the votes.
"Hate speech does not exist legally in America. There's ugly speech. There's gross speech. There's evil speech. And ALL of it is protected by the First Amendment."

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32940
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: Should the minumum caliber restriction exist?
« Reply #7 on: January 04, 2017, 02:39:32 PM »
The best avenue to take if you want a true taste is to lock the thread and not allow comments, but let folks vote. That way...you'll only get the votes.

+1
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline JDHasty

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2015
  • Posts: 7063
  • Location: Tacoma
  • Groups: NRA Benefactor Member, GOA Life Member, Father of 3 NRA Life Members
Re: Should the minumum caliber restriction exist?
« Reply #8 on: January 04, 2017, 02:40:07 PM »
The best avenue to take if you want a true taste is to lock the thread and not allow comments, but let folks vote. That way...you'll only get the votes.

True story

Offline jackelope

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+29)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50753
  • Location: Duvall, WA
  • Groups: jackelope
Re: Should the minumum caliber restriction exist?
« Reply #9 on: January 04, 2017, 02:42:51 PM »
OK, so nobody comment. Just vote.
Let's see how that works.
"Hate speech does not exist legally in America. There's ugly speech. There's gross speech. There's evil speech. And ALL of it is protected by the First Amendment."

Offline jmscon

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2015
  • Posts: 1222
  • Location: Seattle
  • RMEF BHA TRCP
Re: Should the minumum caliber restriction exist?
« Reply #10 on: January 04, 2017, 02:43:12 PM »
I voted to leave it alone. If removed you could get people trying to prove how good a shot they are and start taking unnecessary risks of wounding animals. It's similar to people who fish for salmon with trout gear for the fight. The difference is you might wound an animal that runs off and dies and is wasted or doesn't die and is mutilated. :twocents:
My interpretation of the rules are open to interpretation.
Once I thought I was wrong but I was mistaken.

Offline headshot5

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 1398
  • Location: Port Orchard, WA
Re: Should the minumum caliber restriction exist?
« Reply #11 on: January 04, 2017, 02:43:28 PM »
Meh, I'd rather hunt elk with my .25-20 than a .223 anyways.   :chuckle:

Offline T Pearce

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 736
  • Location: Great Columbia Basin - Moses Lake
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: Should the minumum caliber restriction exist?
« Reply #12 on: January 04, 2017, 02:45:21 PM »
I just want to punch a cougar with the 204
T
Pavement, crowds and inaccurate rifles...
Thanks anyway.

JUNK SCIENCE, Never touch the stuff...
If you are reading this, you can now tell your friends that you know someone that drinks Rainier Beer.
Sometimes the main rd.....sometimes the Candy Trail.

Offline Mongo Hunter

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 855
  • Location: Vancouver
  • Pew Pew lifestyle
Re: Should the minumum caliber restriction exist?
« Reply #13 on: January 04, 2017, 02:55:38 PM »
I voted to leave it alone. If removed you could get people trying to prove how good a shot they are and start taking unnecessary risks of wounding animals. It's similar to people who fish for salmon with trout gear for the fight. The difference is you might wound an animal that runs off and dies and is wasted or doesn't die and is mutilated. :twocents:

I think people are more likely to take unnecessary risks using larger calibers thinking they are Christ Kyle.
Vegetarian: Old Indian word for Bad Hunter.

Offline tgomez

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2014
  • Posts: 1602
  • Location: SPOKANE , WA.
  • "IF IT BLEEDS, WE CAN KILL IT!"
  • Groups: Evergreen Archery Club, Spokane Rifle Club, NRA
Re: Should the minumum caliber restriction exist?
« Reply #14 on: January 04, 2017, 04:08:40 PM »
.243 is fine for the min caliber. I don't see why it needs or should be changed.
☠🫀 ULTIMATE PREDATOR 🫀☠

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal