collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Dumb Question?  (Read 3995 times)

Offline Emptyhanded

  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 699
  • Location: Valleyford
Dumb Question?
« on: February 13, 2009, 01:35:16 PM »
I always read about how some cartridges are "easier" to reload for. What makes one cartridge easier to reload than another? All i can come up with is availability of brass. Sorry, for the dumb question. Thanks for any help.

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39203
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: Dumb Question?
« Reply #1 on: February 13, 2009, 01:46:41 PM »
I'm not sure there is any difference in the ease of loading different cartridges. The only "easier" one would be any straight walled pistol cartridge, like a 44 Remington Magnum. With that type of case you can use carbide resizing dies which eliminates the need to lube the case before running it through the die. Other than that I can't think of why any cartridge would be easier to reload than any other.

Offline ThePascoKid

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 734
  • Location: Tri-Cities
Re: Dumb Question?
« Reply #2 on: February 13, 2009, 01:51:31 PM »
Using a single stage press like a Rock chucker I have found it harder to load the smaller calibers like .223 just because of the size of the bullet, or maybe it's the size of my damn fingers :dunno:  Starting it up through the seating die can be a pain.
You old sailor you, you motor boatin' son of a bitch

Offline littletoes

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 885
  • Location: NE Part of Worshing-ton,
  • old fart
Re: Dumb Question?
« Reply #3 on: February 13, 2009, 06:42:31 PM »
"Easier" is usually a reference to how easy it is to make a round accurate.

Cartriges such as the .308, .223, or such are "easy". It doesn't take a lot of load work to make em shoot.
"The People of the United States are the rightful masters of both Congress and the Courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution." - Abraham Lincoln

Offline Threebyfour

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 87
  • Location: Mc Cleary Wa.
  • Here they come to snuff the rooster,,, oh yeah.
Re: Dumb Question?
« Reply #4 on: February 13, 2009, 06:45:34 PM »
Some cartridges can be more difficult it seems to me,, I load for the 243 and it seems easy,, When I load for the .350 rem mag I have to be careful not to collapse the shoulder due to a very steep angle.
Never give up, he will show up.

Offline littletoes

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 885
  • Location: NE Part of Worshing-ton,
  • old fart
Re: Dumb Question?
« Reply #5 on: February 14, 2009, 06:59:50 AM »
Yessiree, I think "accurate" means sub  1/2 MOA. My factory 300 Weatherby is a hard one to load for. All of the factory "free bore" makes it very diffucult for boat-tail bullets to perform well.
"The People of the United States are the rightful masters of both Congress and the Courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution." - Abraham Lincoln

Offline 12Gauge

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 555
  • Location: Lacey, WA
Re: Dumb Question?
« Reply #6 on: February 14, 2009, 07:47:38 AM »
Using a single stage press like a Rock chucker I have found it harder to load the smaller calibers like .223 just because of the size of the bullet, or maybe it's the size of my damn fingers :dunno:  Starting it up through the seating die can be a pain.


That's why I chucked my rock chucker and bought a Lee Turrret press, so I do not have to re-set the dies everytime, been using it 35 years now
Progressives are coming for your guns. 
What are you going to do?

Well me, I do not have any guns, gave away or sold them 15 years ago.

Offline ing

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2009
  • Posts: 599
  • Location: WA
Re: Dumb Question?
« Reply #7 on: February 14, 2009, 09:55:21 AM »
Yessiree, I think "accurate" means sub  1/2 MOA. My factory 300 Weatherby is a hard one to load for. All of the factory "free bore" makes it very diffucult for boat-tail bullets to perform well.
I'm in the market for a 300 WBY and plan on reloading for it.  Why dont boat-tails perform well out of a free bore?  I plan on loading 165 and 180 grain bullets. What is your recommended bullet?

Offline Emptyhanded

  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 699
  • Location: Valleyford
Re: Dumb Question?
« Reply #8 on: February 14, 2009, 08:13:36 PM »
Thanks guys for the help. I was just curious as to what made one less difficult. Thanks Again.

Offline littletoes

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 885
  • Location: NE Part of Worshing-ton,
  • old fart
Re: Dumb Question?
« Reply #9 on: February 14, 2009, 08:45:54 PM »
Just hope it helped Emptyhanded!

Ing-The 300 Weatherby is an amazing round, but the "Freebore" that allows the higher velocity (they kinda sneek that in for a little "sales pitch" in the speed department), it isn't conducive for the proper harmonics that boat-tails like, to put it simple.

Flat-based bullets are more forgiving in this area.
If you arn't afraid to play with the seating depth, you may find a sweet spot that the rifle likes, but Weatherby uses so much (more than the Remington's and Winchester's I've been around, but YES, they use freebore too), free bore, its hard to get close to the lands.

I haven't tried the 240 grain Match Kings yet, but yes I do want to. The new Weatherby's come with a 1 in 9 1/2" twist, which may just stabilize that round.
Sierra MK's are very forgiving in that department, and it may just be a powder/bullet combo. I've tried the 200 grain Mk, which is a very accuratly made bullet, and have had 3  shot groups just over an 1", using Reloader 25 (I'm a sucker for slow burning powders!). But I also have a weekness for ity bity groups, 1" just isn't small enough for me. The Sierra Manuel for instance recommends Reloader 22, which I haven't tried, so go figure?   ;)

I had the R25 on the shelf.....it does work great with Speer Grand Slams though, under 1" at 100, and over 3100 fps in my rifle. Those 200 MK's? Had 'em over 3150 fps, but you have to work up your own loads, that one was too hot to publish on here....some nut might try it!

What  bullets were you thinking? 
"The People of the United States are the rightful masters of both Congress and the Courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution." - Abraham Lincoln

Offline ing

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2009
  • Posts: 599
  • Location: WA
Re: Dumb Question?
« Reply #10 on: February 15, 2009, 11:33:28 AM »
littletoes, I was planning on using 165 grain Nosler Partitions and Ballistic tips. Maybe even an Accubond.  I am also thinking about trying Hornady 165 grain soft points.  I believe those are a flat based bullet.  I am a big fan of .30 cal 165 grain bullets.  I have had great success using them for deer out of a 30-06.  They hit hard and dont seem to tear up too much meat.

Offline buckhorn2

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 3511
  • Location: grayland wa.
Re: Dumb Question?
« Reply #11 on: February 15, 2009, 12:02:00 PM »
I have had good luck and good groups useing 79 grains of H4831 and 180 grain accubounds I used to use ballistic tips but the accubound has shown better results for us . It has helped acciracy for us by seating the bullets out more.

Offline norsepeak

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 1889
  • Location: Chinook Pass, Wa
Re: Dumb Question?
« Reply #12 on: February 15, 2009, 12:28:09 PM »
I haven't had great luck grouping with the ballistic tips in my 300 wtby either in the 165 or 180.  Trying Barnes tsx now, we'll see. :dunno:

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

49 Degrees North Early Bull Moose by washingtonmuley
[Today at 12:00:55 PM]


MA 6 EAST fishing report? by washingtonmuley
[Today at 11:56:01 AM]


I'm Going To Need Karl To Come up With That 290 Muley Sunscreen Bug Spray Combo by highside74
[Today at 11:07:49 AM]


Kings by Gentrys
[Today at 11:05:40 AM]


Nevada bull hunt 2025 by High Climber
[Today at 10:32:52 AM]


2025 Crab! by ghosthunter
[Today at 09:43:49 AM]


AUCTION: SE Idaho DIY Deer or Deer/Elk Hunt by Dan-o
[Today at 09:26:43 AM]


Survey in ? by hdshot
[Today at 09:20:27 AM]


Bear behavior by brew
[Today at 08:40:20 AM]


Bearpaw Outfitters Annual July 4th Hunt Sale by bearpaw
[Today at 07:57:12 AM]


A lonely Job... by Loup Loup
[Today at 07:47:41 AM]


2025 Montana alternate list by bear
[Today at 06:06:48 AM]


Accura MR-X 45 load development by kyles_88
[Today at 05:27:26 AM]


Son drawn - Silver Dollar Youth Any Elk - Help? by Boss .300 winmag
[Yesterday at 09:42:07 PM]


Toutle Quality Bull - Rifle by HntnFsh
[Yesterday at 08:09:14 PM]


MA-10 Coho by WAcoueshunter
[Yesterday at 02:08:31 PM]


KODIAK06 2025 trail cam and personal pics thread by kodiak06
[Yesterday at 01:52:01 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal