Free: Contests & Raffles.
I saw on the news yesterday that the ACLU here in WA is trying to make Driving While License/Privilege Suspended not a crime any longer. So not having a license is not a crime, suspended license not a crime, why get a license or ever pay a ticket. Nothing would ever happen to you.
Already scary enough them driving. A few family members have been in accidents from illegals driving. And of course they don't have insurance so, people they hit are screwed and thy get a slap on the wrist. And for them to get hunting licenses? Are they able to purchase weapons legally? I don't know. Either way bad idea. I say full effect deportation policy.
Quote from: Crunchy on February 26, 2017, 11:21:35 AMI saw on the news yesterday that the ACLU here in WA is trying to make Driving While License/Privilege Suspended not a crime any longer. So not having a license is not a crime, suspended license not a crime, why get a license or ever pay a ticket. Nothing would ever happen to you. Driving without a DL is a crime (RCW 46.20.005)...The state does need to figure something out with the Driving While License Suspended 3rd Degree (DWLS 3) charge. It is upsetting that between a quarter and a third of all misdemeanor and gross misdemeanor charges filed in courts in WA are DWLS 3 charges. DWLS 3 is essentially being suspended because you didn't pay a traffic citation. Those DWLS 3 cases are taking time away from prosecutors who could be prosecuting other crimes such as theft, trespass, and hey fish and wildlife cases!The ACLU wants WA to decriminalize DWLS 3 and make it another traffic citation. Representative Hayes who is a Republican and Snohomish County Deputy has sponsored a bill that would require you to have two unpaid traffic citations before your license is suspended.Just an idea of how ridiculous this is look at this. Spokane and Snohomish County Prosecutors probably are the worst in the state in terms of actually filing criminal charges. As an example, they hardly file fish and wildlife cases. But in order for the Snohomish County Prosecutor to file DWLS 3 charges the offender must have TEN unpaid traffic citations. Best part? This is on their own website...
Quote from: bigtex on February 26, 2017, 07:38:51 PMQuote from: Crunchy on February 26, 2017, 11:21:35 AMI saw on the news yesterday that the ACLU here in WA is trying to make Driving While License/Privilege Suspended not a crime any longer. So not having a license is not a crime, suspended license not a crime, why get a license or ever pay a ticket. Nothing would ever happen to you. Driving without a DL is a crime (RCW 46.20.005)...The state does need to figure something out with the Driving While License Suspended 3rd Degree (DWLS 3) charge. It is upsetting that between a quarter and a third of all misdemeanor and gross misdemeanor charges filed in courts in WA are DWLS 3 charges. DWLS 3 is essentially being suspended because you didn't pay a traffic citation. Those DWLS 3 cases are taking time away from prosecutors who could be prosecuting other crimes such as theft, trespass, and hey fish and wildlife cases!The ACLU wants WA to decriminalize DWLS 3 and make it another traffic citation. Representative Hayes who is a Republican and Snohomish County Deputy has sponsored a bill that would require you to have two unpaid traffic citations before your license is suspended.Just an idea of how ridiculous this is look at this. Spokane and Snohomish County Prosecutors probably are the worst in the state in terms of actually filing criminal charges. As an example, they hardly file fish and wildlife cases. But in order for the Snohomish County Prosecutor to file DWLS 3 charges the offender must have TEN unpaid traffic citations. Best part? This is on their own website...I notice that DWLS 3 is a common charge on the county jail roster. Often being an additional charge, but sometimes being the sole charge. Guy/gal picked up on Fri afternoon and locked up until Monday.
Quote from: JimmyHoffa on February 26, 2017, 08:35:58 PMQuote from: bigtex on February 26, 2017, 07:38:51 PMQuote from: Crunchy on February 26, 2017, 11:21:35 AMI saw on the news yesterday that the ACLU here in WA is trying to make Driving While License/Privilege Suspended not a crime any longer. So not having a license is not a crime, suspended license not a crime, why get a license or ever pay a ticket. Nothing would ever happen to you. Driving without a DL is a crime (RCW 46.20.005)...The state does need to figure something out with the Driving While License Suspended 3rd Degree (DWLS 3) charge. It is upsetting that between a quarter and a third of all misdemeanor and gross misdemeanor charges filed in courts in WA are DWLS 3 charges. DWLS 3 is essentially being suspended because you didn't pay a traffic citation. Those DWLS 3 cases are taking time away from prosecutors who could be prosecuting other crimes such as theft, trespass, and hey fish and wildlife cases!The ACLU wants WA to decriminalize DWLS 3 and make it another traffic citation. Representative Hayes who is a Republican and Snohomish County Deputy has sponsored a bill that would require you to have two unpaid traffic citations before your license is suspended.Just an idea of how ridiculous this is look at this. Spokane and Snohomish County Prosecutors probably are the worst in the state in terms of actually filing criminal charges. As an example, they hardly file fish and wildlife cases. But in order for the Snohomish County Prosecutor to file DWLS 3 charges the offender must have TEN unpaid traffic citations. Best part? This is on their own website...I notice that DWLS 3 is a common charge on the county jail roster. Often being an additional charge, but sometimes being the sole charge. Guy/gal picked up on Fri afternoon and locked up until Monday.Silly to not have a DL to drive. Common sense and it's $25. I say up the charges because no one will insure a driver w/o a DL. No insurance is a separate but, the state needs to stop the non-sense. The no DL will only protect cheap bums and illegals who drive. Everyone else is screwed if someone without a DL hits them.
Quote from: garrett89 on February 28, 2017, 12:43:44 PMQuote from: JimmyHoffa on February 26, 2017, 08:35:58 PMQuote from: bigtex on February 26, 2017, 07:38:51 PMQuote from: Crunchy on February 26, 2017, 11:21:35 AMI saw on the news yesterday that the ACLU here in WA is trying to make Driving While License/Privilege Suspended not a crime any longer. So not having a license is not a crime, suspended license not a crime, why get a license or ever pay a ticket. Nothing would ever happen to you. Driving without a DL is a crime (RCW 46.20.005)...The state does need to figure something out with the Driving While License Suspended 3rd Degree (DWLS 3) charge. It is upsetting that between a quarter and a third of all misdemeanor and gross misdemeanor charges filed in courts in WA are DWLS 3 charges. DWLS 3 is essentially being suspended because you didn't pay a traffic citation. Those DWLS 3 cases are taking time away from prosecutors who could be prosecuting other crimes such as theft, trespass, and hey fish and wildlife cases!The ACLU wants WA to decriminalize DWLS 3 and make it another traffic citation. Representative Hayes who is a Republican and Snohomish County Deputy has sponsored a bill that would require you to have two unpaid traffic citations before your license is suspended.Just an idea of how ridiculous this is look at this. Spokane and Snohomish County Prosecutors probably are the worst in the state in terms of actually filing criminal charges. As an example, they hardly file fish and wildlife cases. But in order for the Snohomish County Prosecutor to file DWLS 3 charges the offender must have TEN unpaid traffic citations. Best part? This is on their own website...I notice that DWLS 3 is a common charge on the county jail roster. Often being an additional charge, but sometimes being the sole charge. Guy/gal picked up on Fri afternoon and locked up until Monday.Silly to not have a DL to drive. Common sense and it's $25. I say up the charges because no one will insure a driver w/o a DL. No insurance is a separate but, the state needs to stop the non-sense. The no DL will only protect cheap bums and illegals who drive. Everyone else is screwed if someone without a DL hits them.They have a license, it is just suspended due to unpaid parking tickets. This isn't the one where you don't have one for whatever reason (including an illegal immigrant).
They could hunt in any season--Modern doesn't require the use of a rifle.
QuoteQuoteProvided that the non-U.S. citizen was born after January 1, 1972, and successfully passed Hunter Education training, they can purchase a hunting license. If non-U.S. citizens meet residency requirements, they can buy resident licenses. If they do not meet residency requirements, they need to pay out of state fees. Under RCW 9.41.175, nonimmigrant aliens may possess firearms in the U.S. if they possess a valid hunting license issued by a state. See http://www.atf.gov/firearms/faq/nonimmigrant-aliens.html.
QuoteProvided that the non-U.S. citizen was born after January 1, 1972, and successfully passed Hunter Education training, they can purchase a hunting license. If non-U.S. citizens meet residency requirements, they can buy resident licenses. If they do not meet residency requirements, they need to pay out of state fees. Under RCW 9.41.175, nonimmigrant aliens may possess firearms in the U.S. if they possess a valid hunting license issued by a state. See http://www.atf.gov/firearms/faq/nonimmigrant-aliens.html.
Provided that the non-U.S. citizen was born after January 1, 1972, and successfully passed Hunter Education training, they can purchase a hunting license. If non-U.S. citizens meet residency requirements, they can buy resident licenses. If they do not meet residency requirements, they need to pay out of state fees. Under RCW 9.41.175, nonimmigrant aliens may possess firearms in the U.S. if they possess a valid hunting license issued by a state. See http://www.atf.gov/firearms/faq/nonimmigrant-aliens.html.
Back to the original question: can an illegal immigrant buy a resident hunting license? Not unless they have graduated Hunter Education. In addition, they would only be able to hunt during ML or Archery because they can't legally purchase a firearm. In all of the classes I've taught, not once have I thought someone was or might have been an illegal alien. It would be extremely unusual (and probably stupid), for an illegal to voluntarily register for a government program.
Quote from: JimmyHoffa on February 28, 2017, 01:31:13 PMThey could hunt in any season--Modern doesn't require the use of a rifle.You kind of missed the point. There aren't any illegals lining up to take Hunter Education. If they're hunting, they're "undocumented hunters".
Quote from: pianoman9701 on February 28, 2017, 01:49:57 PMQuote from: JimmyHoffa on February 28, 2017, 01:31:13 PMThey could hunt in any season--Modern doesn't require the use of a rifle.You kind of missed the point. There aren't any illegals lining up to take Hunter Education. If they're hunting, they're "undocumented hunters". What about those born before 1973? What documentation do they show the DOL when getting a drivers license, couldn't they simply say they were born in 1972, I mean, who is going to verify it?
The most common examples of documents that the department will accept include: certified birth certificates certain court papers foreign passports or driver's licenses refugee relief placement packets