collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Selkirk BC  (Read 3650 times)

Offline nwwanderer

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 4681
Selkirk BC
« on: March 31, 2017, 08:04:13 AM »
Any news on the BC Selkirk cull this year?  They are helping with our wolf problem and need our support.  They have more than 200,000 negative hits on the cull that is a multi-year program.

Offline WAcoyotehunter

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 4457
  • Location: Pend Oreille County
Re: Selkirk BC
« Reply #1 on: March 31, 2017, 08:05:21 AM »
I have not heard much about it lately.  They don't talk about the plans until it's done because people block the helipad and disrupt the work

Offline pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 44643
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • WWC, NRA Life, WFW, NAGR, RMEF, WSB, NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace

Offline pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 44643
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • WWC, NRA Life, WFW, NAGR, RMEF, WSB, NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: Selkirk BC
« Reply #3 on: March 31, 2017, 08:20:43 AM »
My thumbs up is not for the article but the news shooting them from heli is the most humane and safe method. Fire in the hole!
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace

Offline WAcoyotehunter

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 4457
  • Location: Pend Oreille County
Re: Selkirk BC
« Reply #4 on: March 31, 2017, 11:57:49 AM »
:tup:
http://www.nationalobserver.com/2017/02/01/news/bc-government-scientists-admit-wolf-cull-inhumane-then-propose-expand-it
Geez no kidding.... Talk about taking things out of context.  The headline should mention some of the other things GS the scientists said

Offline buglebrush

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2010
  • Posts: 1614
Re: Selkirk BC
« Reply #5 on: June 16, 2017, 05:50:27 PM »
Funny how an animal can suddenly be endangered just by stepping across a line in the woods.  The ESA is the biggest farce in modern wildlife management.   :bash:

Offline WAcoyotehunter

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 4457
  • Location: Pend Oreille County
Re: Selkirk BC
« Reply #6 on: June 17, 2017, 09:10:06 PM »
??  They are not protected by the ESA in either state in the Selkirks.

They are still protected by state law in WA.

Offline buglebrush

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2010
  • Posts: 1614
Re: Selkirk BC
« Reply #7 on: June 18, 2017, 06:47:03 AM »
I know that.  I said ESA, but was simply referring to the whole protected/endangered thing.  You don't find Washington's  Wolf plan outrageous at all do you?   :yike:

Offline WAcoyotehunter

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 4457
  • Location: Pend Oreille County
Re: Selkirk BC
« Reply #8 on: June 18, 2017, 09:03:14 AM »
I know that.  I said ESA, but was simply referring to the whole protected/endangered thing.  You don't find Washington's  Wolf plan outrageous at all do you?   :yike:
I didn't say that I liked WA wolf plan.  I spent a lot of time arguing for a better plan and it didn't happen.  I also don't like that WA won't remove wolves from the Caribou recovery area.  I have tried to make that happen but it's not in the cards just yet.

Offline buglebrush

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2010
  • Posts: 1614
Re: Selkirk BC
« Reply #9 on: June 18, 2017, 08:56:52 PM »
I know that.  I said ESA, but was simply referring to the whole protected/endangered thing.  You don't find Washington's  Wolf plan outrageous at all do you?   :yike:
I didn't say that I liked WA wolf plan.  I spent a lot of time arguing for a better plan and it didn't happen.  I also don't like that WA won't remove wolves from the Caribou recovery area.  I have tried to make that happen but it's not in the cards just yet.

I've always thought it sadly ironic about the wolves and Caribou.  I found a Caribou shed this year while elk hunting.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal