Free: Contests & Raffles.
Quote from: baker5150 on April 04, 2017, 12:26:43 PMQuote from: Macs B on April 04, 2017, 08:40:36 AMQuote from: baker5150 on April 04, 2017, 08:36:03 AMFrom my experience...Duramax LBZ models (2005 I think)Cummins common rail 24v 2007.5 and earlier (non dpf)7.3 liter Power stroke, 6.0 liter power stroke if bulletproofedI prefer the CumminsGood or Bad? These are engines I've personally used for work/play that I would recommend. Ive had newer cummins and 6.4 liter PS that I don't recommend. Both un-modifiedwhat should a person watch for on the 6.4 ps?
Quote from: Macs B on April 04, 2017, 08:40:36 AMQuote from: baker5150 on April 04, 2017, 08:36:03 AMFrom my experience...Duramax LBZ models (2005 I think)Cummins common rail 24v 2007.5 and earlier (non dpf)7.3 liter Power stroke, 6.0 liter power stroke if bulletproofedI prefer the CumminsGood or Bad? These are engines I've personally used for work/play that I would recommend. Ive had newer cummins and 6.4 liter PS that I don't recommend. Both un-modified
Quote from: baker5150 on April 04, 2017, 08:36:03 AMFrom my experience...Duramax LBZ models (2005 I think)Cummins common rail 24v 2007.5 and earlier (non dpf)7.3 liter Power stroke, 6.0 liter power stroke if bulletproofedI prefer the CumminsGood or Bad?
From my experience...Duramax LBZ models (2005 I think)Cummins common rail 24v 2007.5 and earlier (non dpf)7.3 liter Power stroke, 6.0 liter power stroke if bulletproofedI prefer the Cummins
Probably the fuel level sending unit. Part of the fuel pump module. Intermittent problems suck. If we can't reproduce them, we can't verify a failed part and 99% of the time, we won't guess/shotgun parts. If we can't fix it, customers think we're not smart enough to figure out what's wrong with their vehicle.
Quote from: jackelope on April 04, 2017, 03:22:38 PMProbably the fuel level sending unit. Part of the fuel pump module. Intermittent problems suck. If we can't reproduce them, we can't verify a failed part and 99% of the time, we won't guess/shotgun parts. If we can't fix it, customers think we're not smart enough to figure out what's wrong with their vehicle.From what I recall they thought it was a wiring issue between the tank and the dash. We didn't think it was a big enough issue to pay a bunch of money to have them chase down a bad wire, so we just lived with it. I never thought they weren't smart enough to find the issue. This was back when Jerry Chambers owned the dealership in Bellingham. They had some really good techs back then, we did a lot of business with him before he passed.
Quote from: C-Money on April 04, 2017, 08:35:16 AMI got away from diesel. Been doing my pulling the last 8 years with a 2004 Ford V10, 6 speed manual. Stock trailer, camp trailer, ATV trailer, does fine for me. Been very dependable.Great truck but mine netted 7 mpg
I got away from diesel. Been doing my pulling the last 8 years with a 2004 Ford V10, 6 speed manual. Stock trailer, camp trailer, ATV trailer, does fine for me. Been very dependable.
What's this were stuff? U have a turd in your pocket?
$10k later..... Lol. That alone is twice all the total maintenance I've spent on my Ford since 2006 when I bought it. And all the tuners ect will make more costs in the ling run accelerating the wear on all rolling parts on the truck. I'd never buy a modified truck. Bearings, ball joints, gears, u joints etc all go out faster with big tires and more power. There is always a sacrifice no matter what folks claim on fuel economy. Bigger tires and more power equal more stress on everything which equals premature failure. I'd say half life if you're lucky nice engine.... Everything else is shot just past 150k.
Quote from: Oh Mah on April 05, 2017, 12:10:39 AMQuote from: baker5150 on April 04, 2017, 12:26:43 PMQuote from: Macs B on April 04, 2017, 08:40:36 AMQuote from: baker5150 on April 04, 2017, 08:36:03 AMFrom my experience...Duramax LBZ models (2005 I think)Cummins common rail 24v 2007.5 and earlier (non dpf)7.3 liter Power stroke, 6.0 liter power stroke if bulletproofedI prefer the CumminsGood or Bad? These are engines I've personally used for work/play that I would recommend. Ive had newer cummins and 6.4 liter PS that I don't recommend. Both un-modifiedwhat should a person watch for on the 6.4 ps?EGR coolers, high pressure pumps, injectors, radiators. I've had one in the shop the guy has had the engine replaced(elsewhere) and then the exhaust manifolds replaced 3 times.
Quote from: Happy Gilmore on April 04, 2017, 09:47:09 PM$10k later..... Lol. That alone is twice all the total maintenance I've spent on my Ford since 2006 when I bought it. And all the tuners ect will make more costs in the ling run accelerating the wear on all rolling parts on the truck. I'd never buy a modified truck. Bearings, ball joints, gears, u joints etc all go out faster with big tires and more power. There is always a sacrifice no matter what folks claim on fuel economy. Bigger tires and more power equal more stress on everything which equals premature failure. I'd say half life if you're lucky nice engine.... Everything else is shot just past 150k.Yea, but your trucks don't have all the emissions crap the newer ones have for one. Second, it doesn't cost 10k to delete and tune a truck. More like 1-2k largely depending on the tuner. My buddy just had to have the egr replaced on his '11 f350 to the tune of $2k. Longevity also depends on what tune you run. If your running a performance tune, absolutely it's gonna take its toll on the internals. I'd argue that a stock or fuel mileage tune does nothing to decrease longevity. Just reduces having to replace dpf and egr down the road.
7.3 fuel system is inferior. Auto trans are not good. Loud. 33% more parts to break. mpg is less than 5.9 cummins. Power is less. That said they are good and rate # 2 from me. 5.9 cummins is the best period. No contest here.
Quote from: Mudman on April 05, 2017, 10:22:18 AM7.3 fuel system is inferior. Auto trans are not good. Loud. 33% more parts to break. mpg is less than 5.9 cummins. Power is less. That said they are good and rate # 2 from me. 5.9 cummins is the best period. No contest here. I've never touched my fuel system, rebuilt the transmission at 400k because I thought it was slipping, turned out to be a oil pressure sensor, still pulls my loaded 22' boat over the pass on cruise at 75mph without kicking down and continues to get 18 mpg daily driving........all while approaching half a million miles! YMMV