collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: New Backcountry Rifle  (Read 14417 times)

Offline lewy

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 3975
  • Location: buckley
  • IBEW RMEF WSTA WCO NRA
Re: New Backcountry Rifle
« Reply #15 on: May 12, 2017, 08:57:27 AM »
You listed some great options and have a really good do all caliber picked out! I'll agree that the sako/tikka route is worth considering. I've been pondering a cooper 92 myself for some time, just wish I could put my hands on one first. Handled a ca ridgeline at sportsmans the other day and it felt pretty darn good!
Go hawks

Offline opdinkslayer

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2008
  • Posts: 2827
Re: New Backcountry Rifle
« Reply #16 on: May 12, 2017, 12:06:42 PM »
Buy a tikka superlite and then take all the extra money it would cost you for the rifles you listed and put a brake(if you want),rail/top end rings & the best glass you can buy on top of it. They are under 6 lbs. and shoot lights out. Stock upgrades are available if you don't like the factory one as well. :twocents: :tup:

I've already got the glass. I picked up the Vortex Razor HD LH a couple weeks back. It is getting lonely in the safe! I know those Tikka's shoot, just never been a fan personally.

If your considering a cooper backcountry and already have the glass then why don't ya go all the way and have Travis @ Rbros build ya a lwhunter and there is no wondering if you got a shooter or not? Whats another 1200 when your that deep into a rifle/scope setup? :dunno: :chuckle:

Offline jackelope

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+29)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50683
  • Location: Duvall, WA
  • Groups: jackelope
Re: New Backcountry Rifle
« Reply #17 on: May 12, 2017, 12:50:17 PM »
Does anyone have a 700AWR? Interesting they don't list a weight.

https://www.remington.com/rifles/bolt-action/model-700/model-700-american-wilderness-rifle
It's listed, just gotta scroll way over to the right. 7.375 pounds  :tup:

Dang....it didn't fit on my screen and I didn't scroll. Thanks dude. Forget that option. That's a heavy rifle.
"Hate speech does not exist legally in America. There's ugly speech. There's gross speech. There's evil speech. And ALL of it is protected by the First Amendment."

Offline fillthefreezer

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 1486
  • Location: tacoma
  • @adventure_sd
Re: New Backcountry Rifle
« Reply #18 on: May 12, 2017, 01:35:33 PM »
why buy a super ultralight "backcountry" rifle then put a razor on it?

Offline opdinkslayer

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2008
  • Posts: 2827
Re: New Backcountry Rifle
« Reply #19 on: May 12, 2017, 03:02:05 PM »
why buy a super ultralight "backcountry" rifle then put a razor on it?
[/quote

The razor lh model is a 1 inch tube lightweight model not the boat anchor razor your thinking of. :chuckle:

Offline kselkhunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2014
  • Posts: 1652
  • Location: United States
Re: New Backcountry Rifle
« Reply #20 on: May 12, 2017, 03:04:17 PM »
Why not put a Razor on it?  None of the guns under consideration are "super ultralight" as it's 300 win mag caliber (need the extra weight to soak up recoil, even with a break).

The 300 win mag version of the Ascent is 6lbs 7ounces (it's the 308 win or 6.5 Creedmoor versions of Ascent that are the lower 4lbs 13ounces weight).  Model 70 Extreme Weather is 7lb 4 ounces in 300 win mag.  Christensen Ridgeline is 6.8lbs.  Legendary Arms is 6.6-7lbs. For comparison, a standard Browning X-bolt Stainless in 300WSM is 6lb 8ounces for the standard rifle, 6lb 13ounces for the 300 win mag version. 

A Leupold Vx2 3-9x33 "Ultralight" is 11.5 ounces.  A Razor HD LH 13.4 ounces in the 1.5-8x32.  You can drop down to 6.5 ounces with the Leupold 2.5x20mm Ultralight, but I wouldn't do that if it were me (especially if putting it on a 6.5-7lb rifle already).  A basic Zeiss Conquest 3-9x40 is 15 ounces as comparison.  Stepping up to Swarovski Z5 5-25x52 is 17.5 ounces.







Offline fillthefreezer

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 1486
  • Location: tacoma
  • @adventure_sd
Re: New Backcountry Rifle
« Reply #21 on: May 12, 2017, 03:10:05 PM »
thanks opdinkslayer  :chuckle: my bad

Offline jjness11

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Hunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2014
  • Posts: 127
  • Location: Snohomish , wa
  • Groups: RMEF, Ducks Unlimited, Wildlife Committee of Washington
Re: New Backcountry Rifle
« Reply #22 on: May 12, 2017, 03:55:52 PM »
why buy a super ultralight "backcountry" rifle then put a razor on it?
[/quote

The razor lh model is a 1 inch tube lightweight model not the boat anchor razor your thinking of. :chuckle:

Yes, its the Razor HD LH (light hunter). They are pretty impressive scopes.

Offline PNW4Life

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Oct 2013
  • Posts: 68
  • Location: Central Washington
Re: New Backcountry Rifle
« Reply #23 on: May 12, 2017, 04:25:26 PM »
I'm curious how recoil will play a role in overall weight.
What's too light for a 300 mag?

Offline kselkhunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2014
  • Posts: 1652
  • Location: United States
Re: New Backcountry Rifle
« Reply #24 on: May 12, 2017, 04:54:47 PM »
Depends on how good the muzzle break is.  :-) 

The rifles the op listed are all reasonably low weights for caliber.  I wouldn't want to shoot a <6lb 300WM, even with break.  In my experience, the lighter the gun the more challenging to maintain accuracy.

The recoil energy difference is significant in 6lb gun for 308 vs. 300WM.  Which is why there is the 1.5lb difference in the Mountain Ascent for the two calibers.














Offline jjness11

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Hunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2014
  • Posts: 127
  • Location: Snohomish , wa
  • Groups: RMEF, Ducks Unlimited, Wildlife Committee of Washington
Re: New Backcountry Rifle
« Reply #25 on: May 15, 2017, 10:27:01 AM »
I'm curious how recoil will play a role in overall weight.
What's too light for a 300 mag?

Well that was one of the deciding factors in my decision. I ended up going with the Christensen Mesa, due to a little extra weight, and wanting to try out a new rifle. I got my scope mounted and bore sighted last night. Now I need to load up some ammo and get to the range. Let me know if you guys want some feedback/results on this rifle. With it being fairly new to the market, I haven't found much on it. I will be testing it with Nosler brass, 180 accubonds, H100 and RL17.

Online JBar

  • The Family "Guide"
  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+17)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 2147
  • Location: Puyallup
Re: New Backcountry Rifle
« Reply #26 on: May 15, 2017, 10:45:43 AM »
 :tup: I've been looking at this rifle as well so a review would be helpful. Thanks!
Shut up and Hunt!

Offline kselkhunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2014
  • Posts: 1652
  • Location: United States
Re: New Backcountry Rifle
« Reply #27 on: May 15, 2017, 10:57:09 AM »
Yes, please keep us posted.  I've been eyeballing that rifle as well.

Offline yorketransport

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 3310
  • Location: Yelm
  • Preferred pronouns: were/was
Re: New Backcountry Rifle
« Reply #28 on: May 15, 2017, 01:57:05 PM »
I'm curious how recoil will play a role in overall weight.
What's too light for a 300 mag?

You can never go too light. I had a 300 RUM pistol that weighed 6# 10oz scoped and it was very manageable shooting 200gr accubonds at 2945 fps from the 18" barrel. A good muzzle brake fixes everything!

Offline elkslayer069

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 801
  • Location: Wet side
Re: New Backcountry Rifle
« Reply #29 on: May 15, 2017, 02:27:09 PM »
Anybody looked into the Q ? I want one
You gonna draw those pistols or whistle Dixie?

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Idaho on the verge of outlawing by MR5x5
[Today at 01:23:13 PM]


Unit 346 little naches by CarbonHunter
[Today at 12:59:13 PM]


Sheep Ewe - Whitestone Sheep Unit 20 by Pathfinder101
[Today at 12:14:46 PM]


.45 kentucky rifle and patched roundballs by lazydrifter
[Today at 10:15:42 AM]


Smoked salmon by Alchase
[Today at 10:08:58 AM]


Hunting with a suppressor - dumb idea? by Antlershed
[Today at 09:04:09 AM]


Blue Tongue and EHD outbreak in NE Washington by hunter399
[Today at 08:39:56 AM]


What happened to the Cowlitz by HntnFsh
[Today at 08:39:22 AM]


Early Huckleberry Bull Moose tag drawn! by Wanttohuntmore
[Today at 06:53:00 AM]


Curious Kitty by NOCK NOCK
[Today at 06:02:49 AM]


WHAT DID YOUR TRUCK COST NEW? by 2MANY
[Today at 05:22:32 AM]


Reproduction for a Euro Mount in Wa??? by blindluck
[Today at 04:13:44 AM]


Roadless Rule Public Comment by addicted1
[Yesterday at 09:22:08 PM]


Goose hunting in Spokane by Pomdale
[Yesterday at 08:34:54 PM]


GROUSE 2025...the Season is looming! by Boss .300 winmag
[Yesterday at 06:58:25 PM]


Talking About Barely Legal by Boss .300 winmag
[Yesterday at 06:48:19 PM]


GM 6.6l gas 6 speed vs. 10 speed? by HntnFsh
[Yesterday at 05:55:51 PM]


2021 bear had been previously shot before I killed him by cjjcb
[Yesterday at 05:55:10 PM]


Selkirk GMU 113 Moose by vandeman17
[Yesterday at 04:42:53 PM]


Bearpaw Season 2025 by Machias
[Yesterday at 11:56:18 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal