Free: Contests & Raffles.
Quote from: ctwiggs1 on July 27, 2017, 12:29:44 PMQuote from: pianoman9701 on July 27, 2017, 12:13:46 PMQuote from: boneaddict on July 27, 2017, 07:39:29 AMThe real criminals in that case was the wdfw itself. When you are trying to do things by the book but you are getting the runaround because of their agenda. I'd never judge anyone taking matters into their own hands when they are protecting their own. I would only fault the family on the handling of the remains. Absolutely protect your own. Don't broadcast it afterwards, though. This was a huge error in judgement.QuoteSearches of the White’s computer files turned up photos of at least one other wolf killed by Tom, but differently colored, and other evidence, including a deer and a moose poached in 2007 by William.These guys are poachers, through and through. Getting behind them is just playing the "enemy of my enemy" game I don't own a cattle ranch nor have I had my livelihood or home life negatively affected by wolves. Although I agree that, by definition, they poached wolves and I personally wouldn't do it, this is not poaching in the same way as someone killing for thrill or profit. I do try to have empathy for people in different positions/situations from mine. I don't feel I have the right to stand in judgement on that family, except for how they ultimately handled it..
Quote from: pianoman9701 on July 27, 2017, 12:13:46 PMQuote from: boneaddict on July 27, 2017, 07:39:29 AMThe real criminals in that case was the wdfw itself. When you are trying to do things by the book but you are getting the runaround because of their agenda. I'd never judge anyone taking matters into their own hands when they are protecting their own. I would only fault the family on the handling of the remains. Absolutely protect your own. Don't broadcast it afterwards, though. This was a huge error in judgement.QuoteSearches of the White’s computer files turned up photos of at least one other wolf killed by Tom, but differently colored, and other evidence, including a deer and a moose poached in 2007 by William.These guys are poachers, through and through. Getting behind them is just playing the "enemy of my enemy" game
Quote from: boneaddict on July 27, 2017, 07:39:29 AMThe real criminals in that case was the wdfw itself. When you are trying to do things by the book but you are getting the runaround because of their agenda. I'd never judge anyone taking matters into their own hands when they are protecting their own. I would only fault the family on the handling of the remains. Absolutely protect your own. Don't broadcast it afterwards, though. This was a huge error in judgement.
The real criminals in that case was the wdfw itself. When you are trying to do things by the book but you are getting the runaround because of their agenda. I'd never judge anyone taking matters into their own hands when they are protecting their own.
Searches of the White’s computer files turned up photos of at least one other wolf killed by Tom, but differently colored, and other evidence, including a deer and a moose poached in 2007 by William.
http://wdfw.wa.gov/conservation/gray_wolf/updates/update_on_washington_wolves_20170727.pdfUpdate on Washington wolvesLatest reports on key wolf activities, conservation efforts, and management actionsJuly 27, 2017One wolf removed from Smackout PackThe 2017 Wolf-Livestock Interaction Protocol describes tools and approaches designed to influence pack behavior with the goal of reducing the potential for recurrent livestock depredation while continuing to promote wolf recovery. On July 20, WDFW notified the public that non-lethal deterrence measures were not achieving that goal in the Smackout pack territory, and that the director authorized incremental lethal removal of wolves as another tool to address recurrent depredations.The department’s approach to incremental removal consists of a period of active removal operations followed by a period of evaluation to determine if those actions met the goal. The protocol states that once a removal operation has begun, the department will update the public weekly on the number of individuals removed. Lethal removal actions began one weekago, and during that week the department removed 1 wolf.The protocol also states that in most situations the period of active removal will be two weeks or less. Removal operations are ongoing, and the department will provide another update inone week.
What's the first rule of fight club?Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
Bone, is that a woodland caribou?Regardless if it is or not, sure don't hear much about this herd on the brink right in the midst of the thriving wolf packs. Ironic.
