collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Atlantics  (Read 19472 times)

Offline lokidog

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 15145
  • Location: Sultan/Wisconsin
Re: Atlantics
« Reply #45 on: September 18, 2017, 06:50:42 PM »
What's the problem with potentially seeing them in the Sky? :dunno:

 :yeah:  Just another fish to catch, it's not like they are competing for food, cross-breeding, or even breeding at all.

Offline WAcoueshunter

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 2623
Re: Atlantics
« Reply #46 on: September 18, 2017, 08:13:13 PM »
Wouldn't they be eating smolts in the river?

Offline lokidog

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 15145
  • Location: Sultan/Wisconsin
Re: Atlantics
« Reply #47 on: September 18, 2017, 08:52:19 PM »
As far as I know, they are not eating anything.  All of the stomachs have been empty, at least during the first couple weeks.  I think juvenile salmon have a lot more to worry about than these Atlantics like trout, spiny ray fish(where present), Kingfishers, Mergansers, Terns, Cormorants, etc.

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32944
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: Atlantics
« Reply #48 on: December 18, 2017, 05:00:56 PM »
 Was listening to guys on the radio Saturday talking about the Skagit opening for catch and release steelhead. They said some Atlantics have been showing up in the Indians nets upriver. :o

...but not to worry, they can't spawn right? :chuckle:
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline Mfowl

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2012
  • Posts: 4443
  • Location: westside
Re: Atlantics
« Reply #49 on: December 18, 2017, 05:38:17 PM »
Was listening to guys on the radio Saturday talking about the Skagit opening for catch and release steelhead. They said some Atlantics have been showing up in the Indians nets upriver. :o

...but not to worry, they can't spawn right? :chuckle:

Lets hope they do spawn, maybe we'll have something to fish for in the future.  :yike:
Fish hard, hunt harder!

Offline JimmyHoffa

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 14565
  • Location: 150 Years Too Late
Re: Atlantics
« Reply #50 on: December 18, 2017, 05:53:00 PM »
DNR pulled the lease for the operation in Port Angeles.

Offline lokidog

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 15145
  • Location: Sultan/Wisconsin
Re: Atlantics
« Reply #51 on: December 18, 2017, 08:26:33 PM »
Was listening to guys on the radio Saturday talking about the Skagit opening for catch and release steelhead. They said some Atlantics have been showing up in the Indians nets upriver. :o

...but not to worry, they can't spawn right? :chuckle:

They will not be spawning, the few that haven't starved to death are too young to spawn!  I'd like to see evidence that there are still any of these surviving.  Weeks after the escape, there was little evidence that they actually knew how to swallow a fish as all stomachs were empty.

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32944
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: Atlantics
« Reply #52 on: December 18, 2017, 10:47:45 PM »
Was listening to guys on the radio Saturday talking about the Skagit opening for catch and release steelhead. They said some Atlantics have been showing up in the Indians nets upriver. :o

...but not to worry, they can't spawn right? :chuckle:

They will not be spawning, the few that haven't starved to death are too young to spawn!  I'd like to see evidence that there are still any of these surviving.  Weeks after the escape, there was little evidence that they actually knew how to swallow a fish as all stomachs were empty.

 Just telling you what was said on the radio Saturday. :dunno:
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline lokidog

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 15145
  • Location: Sultan/Wisconsin
Re: Atlantics
« Reply #53 on: December 18, 2017, 10:51:27 PM »
Was listening to guys on the radio Saturday talking about the Skagit opening for catch and release steelhead. They said some Atlantics have been showing up in the Indians nets upriver. :o

...but not to worry, they can't spawn right? :chuckle:

They will not be spawning, the few that haven't starved to death are too young to spawn!  I'd like to see evidence that there are still any of these surviving.  Weeks after the escape, there was little evidence that they actually knew how to swallow a fish as all stomachs were empty.

 Just telling you what was said on the radio Saturday. :dunno:

How would anyone know what shows up in the Indian nets anyways, they don't tell anyone the truth....

Offline 7mmfan

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 5487
  • Location: Marysville
    • https://www.facebook.com/rory.oconnor.9480
Re: Atlantics
« Reply #54 on: December 19, 2017, 09:30:43 AM »
The real problem I see with that statement from them about more Atlantics than Chums in their nets, is that there could possibly be more escaped net pen fish in one river system than the 2nd most prolific wild salmon to Pinks. There should be thousands and thousands of chums in there right now.

I used to fish the upper Skagit this time of year and the banks were lined with spawned out chums for miles, and there would still be thousands more spawning. I was up there this weekend, in places where you couldn't cast before because you'd just snag one spawner after another. Nothing. Not a fish.

The Indians are complaining that there are more atlantics in their nets than chums, because they have netted the chums to a point where that's possible. Its sickening. They were netting chums for a chum hatchery for God's sake! There should never be a need for a chum hatchery! No wonder our river systems can't support wild fish anymore, there's no nutrients being put back into them in the fall. All the habitat work in the world won't matter if the system doesn't have the nutrients to support salmon fry and steelhead smolt when they hatch.

I'm disgusted, sorry, rant over.
I hunt, therefore I am.... I fish, therefore I lie.

Offline Gobble Doc

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2010
  • Posts: 2681
  • Location: Snohomish, WA
Re: Atlantics
« Reply #55 on: December 19, 2017, 01:32:00 PM »
The real problem I see with that statement from them about more Atlantics than Chums in their nets, is that there could possibly be more escaped net pen fish in one river system than the 2nd most prolific wild salmon to Pinks. There should be thousands and thousands of chums in there right now.

I used to fish the upper Skagit this time of year and the banks were lined with spawned out chums for miles, and there would still be thousands more spawning. I was up there this weekend, in places where you couldn't cast before because you'd just snag one spawner after another. Nothing. Not a fish.

The Indians are complaining that there are more atlantics in their nets than chums, because they have netted the chums to a point where that's possible. Its sickening. They were netting chums for a chum hatchery for God's sake! There should never be a need for a chum hatchery! No wonder our river systems can't support wild fish anymore, there's no nutrients being put back into them in the fall. All the habitat work in the world won't matter if the system doesn't have the nutrients to support salmon fry and steelhead smolt when they hatch.

I'm disgusted, sorry, rant over.

Completely agree. The chum runs of at least 10-15 years ago seem all but over. But wasn't there a trade of some sort along the way to allow for more Chinook fishing in exchange for chums? I recall something about this a number of years ago. In any event, it's a bummer that there aren't those big dogs to fish for anymore around Thanksgiving. Depressing.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Do you allow your dog to jump out of truck bed? by meathunter 4x4
[Today at 11:45:29 PM]


Where do you keep them by Dan-o
[Today at 10:54:16 PM]


Wader advice by ChesapeakeMan
[Today at 10:44:13 PM]


Yakima Buffalo by time2hunt
[Today at 09:02:31 PM]


Where should i hunt turkeys? Can anyone help? by Birdguy
[Today at 08:16:56 PM]


MOA or MRAD, & Why? by craigapphunt
[Today at 07:29:12 PM]


School Me On Fish Finders by MADMAX
[Today at 07:12:07 PM]


Wyoming 112 or 81 deer by link
[Today at 06:50:29 PM]


Wyoming 2026, who's in? by Stein
[Today at 06:08:33 PM]


2026 Coyotes by Angus
[Today at 03:59:28 PM]


Flooded Corn: Senator Calls USFW To Conduct Formal Study by full choke
[Today at 03:25:57 PM]


Know Where To Hunt Club by johnsc6
[Today at 12:44:11 PM]


35 whelen by dasbear
[Today at 12:33:12 PM]


Wildlife Obsession Duvall WA Taxidermy Closing its doors by Bearhunter
[Today at 08:47:44 AM]


19th Annual Banquet Columbia County Chapter of OHA by Brute
[Today at 08:47:37 AM]


First fur sale Idaho results by JakeLand
[Today at 08:13:20 AM]


European skull personalized wall state mounts by fire*guy
[Today at 06:29:53 AM]


Fur Harvesters shipping by Frank The Tank
[Yesterday at 09:32:29 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal