collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Atlantics  (Read 19097 times)

Offline lokidog

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 15186
  • Location: Sultan/Wisconsin
Re: Atlantics
« Reply #45 on: September 18, 2017, 06:50:42 PM »
What's the problem with potentially seeing them in the Sky? :dunno:

 :yeah:  Just another fish to catch, it's not like they are competing for food, cross-breeding, or even breeding at all.

Offline WAcoueshunter

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 2623
Re: Atlantics
« Reply #46 on: September 18, 2017, 08:13:13 PM »
Wouldn't they be eating smolts in the river?

Offline lokidog

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 15186
  • Location: Sultan/Wisconsin
Re: Atlantics
« Reply #47 on: September 18, 2017, 08:52:19 PM »
As far as I know, they are not eating anything.  All of the stomachs have been empty, at least during the first couple weeks.  I think juvenile salmon have a lot more to worry about than these Atlantics like trout, spiny ray fish(where present), Kingfishers, Mergansers, Terns, Cormorants, etc.

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32954
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: Atlantics
« Reply #48 on: December 18, 2017, 05:00:56 PM »
 Was listening to guys on the radio Saturday talking about the Skagit opening for catch and release steelhead. They said some Atlantics have been showing up in the Indians nets upriver. :o

...but not to worry, they can't spawn right? :chuckle:
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline Mfowl

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2012
  • Posts: 4465
  • Location: westside
Re: Atlantics
« Reply #49 on: December 18, 2017, 05:38:17 PM »
Was listening to guys on the radio Saturday talking about the Skagit opening for catch and release steelhead. They said some Atlantics have been showing up in the Indians nets upriver. :o

...but not to worry, they can't spawn right? :chuckle:

Lets hope they do spawn, maybe we'll have something to fish for in the future.  :yike:
Fish hard, hunt harder!

Offline JimmyHoffa

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 14562
  • Location: 150 Years Too Late
Re: Atlantics
« Reply #50 on: December 18, 2017, 05:53:00 PM »
DNR pulled the lease for the operation in Port Angeles.

Offline lokidog

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 15186
  • Location: Sultan/Wisconsin
Re: Atlantics
« Reply #51 on: December 18, 2017, 08:26:33 PM »
Was listening to guys on the radio Saturday talking about the Skagit opening for catch and release steelhead. They said some Atlantics have been showing up in the Indians nets upriver. :o

...but not to worry, they can't spawn right? :chuckle:

They will not be spawning, the few that haven't starved to death are too young to spawn!  I'd like to see evidence that there are still any of these surviving.  Weeks after the escape, there was little evidence that they actually knew how to swallow a fish as all stomachs were empty.

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32954
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: Atlantics
« Reply #52 on: December 18, 2017, 10:47:45 PM »
Was listening to guys on the radio Saturday talking about the Skagit opening for catch and release steelhead. They said some Atlantics have been showing up in the Indians nets upriver. :o

...but not to worry, they can't spawn right? :chuckle:

They will not be spawning, the few that haven't starved to death are too young to spawn!  I'd like to see evidence that there are still any of these surviving.  Weeks after the escape, there was little evidence that they actually knew how to swallow a fish as all stomachs were empty.

 Just telling you what was said on the radio Saturday. :dunno:
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline lokidog

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 15186
  • Location: Sultan/Wisconsin
Re: Atlantics
« Reply #53 on: December 18, 2017, 10:51:27 PM »
Was listening to guys on the radio Saturday talking about the Skagit opening for catch and release steelhead. They said some Atlantics have been showing up in the Indians nets upriver. :o

...but not to worry, they can't spawn right? :chuckle:

They will not be spawning, the few that haven't starved to death are too young to spawn!  I'd like to see evidence that there are still any of these surviving.  Weeks after the escape, there was little evidence that they actually knew how to swallow a fish as all stomachs were empty.

 Just telling you what was said on the radio Saturday. :dunno:

How would anyone know what shows up in the Indian nets anyways, they don't tell anyone the truth....

Offline 7mmfan

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 5527
  • Location: Marysville
    • https://www.facebook.com/rory.oconnor.9480
Re: Atlantics
« Reply #54 on: December 19, 2017, 09:30:43 AM »
The real problem I see with that statement from them about more Atlantics than Chums in their nets, is that there could possibly be more escaped net pen fish in one river system than the 2nd most prolific wild salmon to Pinks. There should be thousands and thousands of chums in there right now.

I used to fish the upper Skagit this time of year and the banks were lined with spawned out chums for miles, and there would still be thousands more spawning. I was up there this weekend, in places where you couldn't cast before because you'd just snag one spawner after another. Nothing. Not a fish.

The Indians are complaining that there are more atlantics in their nets than chums, because they have netted the chums to a point where that's possible. Its sickening. They were netting chums for a chum hatchery for God's sake! There should never be a need for a chum hatchery! No wonder our river systems can't support wild fish anymore, there's no nutrients being put back into them in the fall. All the habitat work in the world won't matter if the system doesn't have the nutrients to support salmon fry and steelhead smolt when they hatch.

I'm disgusted, sorry, rant over.
I hunt, therefore I am.... I fish, therefore I lie.

Offline Gobble Doc

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2010
  • Posts: 2681
  • Location: Snohomish, WA
Re: Atlantics
« Reply #55 on: December 19, 2017, 01:32:00 PM »
The real problem I see with that statement from them about more Atlantics than Chums in their nets, is that there could possibly be more escaped net pen fish in one river system than the 2nd most prolific wild salmon to Pinks. There should be thousands and thousands of chums in there right now.

I used to fish the upper Skagit this time of year and the banks were lined with spawned out chums for miles, and there would still be thousands more spawning. I was up there this weekend, in places where you couldn't cast before because you'd just snag one spawner after another. Nothing. Not a fish.

The Indians are complaining that there are more atlantics in their nets than chums, because they have netted the chums to a point where that's possible. Its sickening. They were netting chums for a chum hatchery for God's sake! There should never be a need for a chum hatchery! No wonder our river systems can't support wild fish anymore, there's no nutrients being put back into them in the fall. All the habitat work in the world won't matter if the system doesn't have the nutrients to support salmon fry and steelhead smolt when they hatch.

I'm disgusted, sorry, rant over.

Completely agree. The chum runs of at least 10-15 years ago seem all but over. But wasn't there a trade of some sort along the way to allow for more Chinook fishing in exchange for chums? I recall something about this a number of years ago. In any event, it's a bummer that there aren't those big dogs to fish for anymore around Thanksgiving. Depressing.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

TEN TIPS FOR GREAT FIELD PHOTOS - A strategy for taking quality success photos by FlyFish360
[Today at 12:52:29 AM]


How to get big game rules changed? by FlyFish360
[Today at 12:45:04 AM]


Your Idea of the perfect bull elk by kentrek
[Yesterday at 11:53:55 PM]


“Recreational trappers”? by Humptulips
[Yesterday at 10:36:49 PM]


GROUSE 2025...the Season is looming! by Humptulips
[Yesterday at 10:25:47 PM]


Searing prime rib by huntnnw
[Yesterday at 10:24:57 PM]


Define Wide by builtfordtough
[Yesterday at 10:22:00 PM]


Winchester SX3 problem by CNEDUX
[Yesterday at 09:14:55 PM]


Winthrop wolves by KP-Skagit
[Yesterday at 08:38:05 PM]


Ice fishing for walleye by Jpmiller
[Yesterday at 06:28:33 PM]


Perfect 4 by NOCK NOCK
[Yesterday at 06:14:20 PM]


35 whelen by Night goat
[Yesterday at 05:41:23 PM]


Idaho Trapping Journal 2025/26 by Gooseassassin
[Yesterday at 05:12:29 PM]


Learning his ducks by metlhead
[Yesterday at 04:07:20 PM]


GSP Breeders- looking for GSP puppy by gallion_t
[Yesterday at 02:41:10 PM]


Curvy Damascus Utility Fighter by A. Cole
[Yesterday at 02:38:47 PM]


Big changes to skamania county boat launching by dilleytech
[Yesterday at 01:44:52 PM]


Idaho on the verge of outlawing by bearpaw
[Yesterday at 12:02:52 PM]


Nice bachelor herd by nwwanderer
[Yesterday at 06:06:25 AM]


Montana Cutting Deer Licenses by hughjorgan
[December 22, 2025, 08:18:03 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal