collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Lawsuit to end trapping in CA  (Read 2175 times)

Offline Humptulips

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 9111
  • Location: Humptulips
    • Washington State Trappers Association
  • Groups: WSTA, NTA, FTA, OTA, WWC, WFW, NRA
Bruce Vandervort

Offline Kit Carson

  • WA State Trappers Association
  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2015
  • Posts: 1039
  • Location: Snohomish County
  • Groups: NRA, WSTA, NTA
Re: Lawsuit to end trapping in CA
« Reply #1 on: September 14, 2017, 09:41:36 PM »
That is scary.
It seems like it's solely on the basis of license fees not covering the overall expense of regulating statewide trapping...

Are there any states where the license fees do in fact cover the overall total costs of regulation? If that is a way the Antis can wipe out trapping then what is going to keep us able to legally trap?  :yike:

Offline Humptulips

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 9111
  • Location: Humptulips
    • Washington State Trappers Association
  • Groups: WSTA, NTA, FTA, OTA, WWC, WFW, NRA
Re: Lawsuit to end trapping in CA
« Reply #2 on: September 14, 2017, 10:25:04 PM »
I cannot imagine how they could ever come up with a figure for the cost of managing trapping that would legitimately show it cost more then licenses brought in.
I know in this State the Furbearer section manager only spends part of her time on trapping and the majority on her other job which is large carnivores. Probably spend less time then that in CA. No CITES tagging in CA so no expense there. What does that leave? Compiling the reports of catch and season setting is all I can come up with. Bet that could do it all in a day.
Maybe what they need to do is stop trying to manage furbearers, no license needed. With the price of fur I doubt they would ever over harvest.

I wonder if anyone would consider eliminating all government programs that lose money.
Bruce Vandervort

Offline Kit Carson

  • WA State Trappers Association
  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2015
  • Posts: 1039
  • Location: Snohomish County
  • Groups: NRA, WSTA, NTA
Re: Lawsuit to end trapping in CA
« Reply #3 on: September 14, 2017, 11:12:40 PM »
Thank you Bruce. Still a little scary though

Offline UrbanTrapper

  • Life Member: NRA, SCI, DSC, NTA, WSTA, ITA, ATA
  • WA State Trappers Association
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2012
  • Posts: 403
  • Location: Seattle or Kittitas County
  • Groups: NRA, SCI, WWC, HHC, NTA, WSTA
Re: Lawsuit to end trapping in CA
« Reply #4 on: September 15, 2017, 01:02:49 AM »
Bruce, Are you saying you think the lawsuit WILL fail?

Offline SGTDuffman

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 360
  • Location: Washington
Re: Lawsuit to end trapping in CA
« Reply #5 on: September 15, 2017, 05:13:14 AM »
I'd say the comments in that news link are scary, but that's about what I'd expect from a mentally ill morally defunct liberal Mecca like California. Not a trace of common sense to be found anywhere, just breathless proclaimations that hunters and trappers are bloodthirsty murders who are trying to extinct as many species as possible. These people have absolutely no clue what conservation is, and I'd bet that not one of them has ever opened their wallet to fund anything that fiscally supports conservation or enforcement.

Offline G-S

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Jun 2017
  • Posts: 82
  • Location: Lewiston Id
Re: Lawsuit to end trapping in CA
« Reply #6 on: September 15, 2017, 07:33:47 AM »
 :yeah:

Offline Humptulips

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 9111
  • Location: Humptulips
    • Washington State Trappers Association
  • Groups: WSTA, NTA, FTA, OTA, WWC, WFW, NRA
Re: Lawsuit to end trapping in CA
« Reply #7 on: September 15, 2017, 01:25:13 PM »
Bruce, Are you saying you think the lawsuit WILL fail?

If I had to predict what would happen I would guess it will never get to court.
Governor Brown has packed the F&W Commission with animal rights types. They will probably just close the season on furbearers except for depredation work to avoid defending against the suit in court.
Bruce Vandervort

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

2 Dozen CRD's for sale by Badhabit
[Today at 03:02:11 PM]


Are you using a Diesel Fuel Additive and if so which one? by Boss .300 winmag
[Today at 02:48:12 PM]


2025 Canning by RB
[Today at 12:02:43 PM]


Seeking packer OnCall for early archery unit 328 Naneum/Colockum by Olydog09
[Today at 12:00:40 PM]


Taxidermy Issues....HELP! by 2MANY
[Today at 10:18:45 AM]


More Kings! by 3nails
[Today at 10:16:32 AM]


Good Fishing Guides in Puget Sound by Gentrys
[Today at 08:41:04 AM]


Grouse in Vail? by DaMitt Mystagin
[Today at 08:26:13 AM]


AUCTION: Custom knife by Alden Cole by teanawayslayer
[Today at 07:01:32 AM]


I'm Going To Need Karl To Come up With That 290 Muley Sunscreen Bug Spray Combo by blindluck
[Today at 05:58:14 AM]


Palouse buck deer by high_hunter
[Yesterday at 10:58:24 PM]


Palouse/Mica (GMU 127) Access for Trades Work by high_hunter
[Yesterday at 10:54:30 PM]


Spot lock in the salt? by GWP
[Yesterday at 02:45:08 PM]


GPW Trail Closures by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 01:49:27 PM]


Pre season Archery SALE by BigJs Outdoor Store
[Yesterday at 01:32:46 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal