Bump Stocks

[winshooter88]

Just taking a tranquilizer or anti depressant does not prohibit you owning a gun legally, if you are addicted then that is a different story. just like mental health issues there has to be proof of the abuse or an adjudication of mental illness or a commitment to make it illegal, an form what the police have said that didn't happen that they can find out. The latest news reports are saying that he had 12 rifles with bump stocks in his room, and 60 and 100 round magazines.

Personally, I see no need for bump stocks or full auto weapons unless you are fighting a war, they might be fun to try once or twice but the amount of ammo you would use costs to much money. When I was a kid (18) my friend and I tried to see how fast we could empty my Marlin model 60 semi-auto 22 rifle. Using a stop watch either one of us could empty all 19 rounds I just under 4 seconds, of course we couldn't do it with any accuracy.

[HuntnFishnRyan]

betcha can't say bump stocks five times fast 

[Fl0und3rz]

Like Pman says, I'd consider giving up bump stocks, if I could be ensured that that would be the end of this, WE have to give up something, every time a mad man acts.

Otherwise, I'd consider trading bump stocks for unregulated suppressors, national reciprocity, indictments in the IRS political targeting and hillary email scandals, and a shrubbery.


If we are going to demand stuff that has no effect on whether it will prevent evil people from killing again, then those are MY demands.


Nobody tell the knee jerk left that bumpfire device bans would require banning rubber bands, and thumbs, and physics.

[Stein]

Here are two articles on CNN today, take them together:

http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/04/world/gun-control-uk-australia/index.html

http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/04/opinions/las-vegas-police-military-equipment-alexander-opinion/index.html

[Wenatcheejay]

Like Pman says, I'd consider giving up bump stocks, if I could be ensured that that would be the end of this, WE have to give up something, every time a mad man acts.

Otherwise, I'd consider trading bump stocks for unregulated suppressors, national reciprocity, indictments in the IRS political targeting and hillary email scandals, and a shrubbery.


If we are going to demand stuff that has no effect on whether it will prevent evil people from killing again, then those are MY demands.


Nobody tell the knee jerk left that bumpfire device bans would require banning rubber bands, and thumbs, and physics.

You are thinking in terms of negotiation. NO. According to them that debate is over.

These are compromises there is no give and take. You are evil., dangerous, and must be controlled. You must surrender property for no legitimate reason. The next time you will agree to surrender more property and be subjugated to restriction, regulation of your property. Once regulated you will pay fees, taxes, and licensing of your property. You will be monitored, investgated, and evaluated much deeper and invasive than exists. Then, finally you will surrender different property and the cycle goes on. Every time a tool is misused for terror by criminals it is subject to complete Government restriction and or confiscation. All the Left needs is a Patsy and we must submit to their agenda. Kinda like BLM, ANTIFA ANTICS, and so on. They trade in violence to advance a crappy agenda.

I say just kill the bad guys.

[Fl0und3rz]

Like Pman says, I'd consider giving up bump stocks, if I could be ensured that that would be the end of this, WE have to give up something, every time a mad man acts.

Otherwise, I'd consider trading bump stocks for unregulated suppressors, national reciprocity, indictments in the IRS political targeting and hillary email scandals, and a shrubbery.


If we are going to demand stuff that has no effect on whether it will prevent evil people from killing again, then those are MY demands.


Nobody tell the knee jerk left that bumpfire device bans would require banning rubber bands, and thumbs, and physics.

These are compromises there is no give and take. You are evil., dangerous, and must be controlled. You must surrender property for no legitimate reason. The next time you will agree to surrender more property and be subjugated to restriction, regulation of your property. Once regulated you will pay fees, taxes, and licensing of your property. You will be monitored, investgated, and evaluated much deeper and invasive than exists. Then, finally you will surrender different property and the cycle goes on. Every time a tool is misused for terror by criminals it is subject to complete Government restriction and or confiscation. All the Left needs is a Patsy and we must submit to their agenda. Kinda like BLM, ANTIFA ANTICS, and so on. They trade in violence to advance a crappy agenda.

I say just kill the bad guys.

Agreed.

You are thinking in terms of negotiation. NO. According to them that debate is over.

That was said in jest.

[Angry Perch]

https://www.cnbc.com/2017/10/05/nra-endorses-more-regulation-on-bump-stocks-that-boost-guns-firing-rates.html

[Stein]

Interesting situation, NRA is now calling on the ATF to regulate them and it's all over that it was under Obama's watch they were determined to be in compliance.

Of course, it's all for show.  The ATF didn't really have a choice and it didn't matter who was president.  The way the law is written, they are legal.  ATF doesn't write laws.

[CP]

They will be banned, it's just a matter of time.  No one wants to take a stand to support them.  A smart representative would tack the ban on to the SHARE (Sportsman’s Heritage and Recreational Enhancement) Act

[Stein]

Agreed, they are history.  With that momentum, will they get after mags >10 rounds?  It will certainly be tried in some form.

I would imagine WA will have initiatives.

[Fl0und3rz]

Interesting situation, NRA is now calling on the ATF to regulate them and it's all over that it was under Obama's watch they were determined to be in compliance.

Of course, it's all for show.  The ATF didn't really have a choice and it didn't matter who was president.  The way the law is written, they are legal.  ATF doesn't write laws.

[Wenatcheejay]

Most likely we get no healthcare reform, No Tax reform, and get a subject of gun bans at State levels at least, mod items banned by name. (Always super effective). Maybe (Tannerite) binary flash bans, all progun legislation killed. To a Democrat this is quite a bounty isn't It? Why no hammers to break window bans? Hammers are dangerous.

Of course, bullet legislation requiring no more than one round discharged per 3 seconds in all settings would be more effective than all this other stuff.

[bigdave]

I smell a rat. The sound of the gunfire was too consistently spaced to have been a bump fired weapon. Someone is trying to hide something. who? Well, your guess is same as mine at this point.

[Duckslayer89]

Agreed, they are history.  With that momentum, will they get after mags >10 rounds?  It will certainly be tried in some form.

I would imagine WA will have initiatives.

I bought 3 25 round mags for my 10/22 today. And a 10/22.

[Special T]

Bimart had an ammo sale!