Free: Contests & Raffles.
Quote from: Fl0und3rz on October 10, 2017, 12:54:02 PMQuote from: DIYARCHERYJUNKIE on October 10, 2017, 11:06:50 AMWithin the room is far fetched. The guy running to the other room is even more far fetched. 50 yards down the building is not going to be that soft of a thud. it would still be very loud. The video evidence is undisputable and if questions aren't answered a lot more people will be watching alex jones and distrusting the feds. You are obviously convinced of this opinion, and you are entitled to be so. I have seen so many conspiracy theories thrown about on this, and on other instances, by so-called experts using limited bodies of evidence, that I prefer to retain an open mind until all trustworthy evidence forecloses all but one or two reasonable explanations. We are not there yet, not by a long shot.That's a very level headed way to think about it. I am still in disbelief. Quote from: weatherbow21 on October 10, 2017, 11:25:20 AMQuote from: DIYARCHERYJUNKIE on October 10, 2017, 11:12:30 AMQuote from: weatherbow21 on October 10, 2017, 09:58:47 AMQuote from: DIYARCHERYJUNKIE on October 09, 2017, 12:18:22 PMQuote from: fish vacuum on October 08, 2017, 06:05:12 PMQuote from: DIYARCHERYJUNKIE on October 08, 2017, 04:48:37 AMDon't believe the AR Bump stock at all.I don't think that video is using the real audio from Las Vegas. The video from the taxi had much less consistent gunfire.Sent from my SM-J700T using TapatalkFigured you'd deny what's solid evidence. The taxi clip is not used for overlay in this video. The shooting went on for minutes. This video only used a long volley of rounds to compare the rate of fire. The sound clip used is from the same video on the left of the screen. I knew when I first heard the gunfire it was a lmg and I knew there was two shooting locations hundreds of yards apart at least. Loud gunfire then quiet gunfire hundreds of yards away. If you believe the FBI when they tell you on shooter ar anything bump fire or not then your a sheep. But you've proven that time and again and I have little faith you'll ever try to be diplomatic on topics so your opinion has little weight. You really think two shooters including a belt fed machine gun would have only killed 50-60 people in a crowd of 22,000? 11-12 minutes of shooting?Nice first post! Welcome to the site! I believe what I hear and see with my eyes from the undisputable video evidence... Please provide something that disputes the proof that has been recorded by hundreds. You really think that much killing was done with a AR-15 on some cheap $250.00 bump stock??? The rate of fire is way off. The multiple gunshots going off at different distances is undisputable. Please give me your analysis of what you hear and see in the above three videos... I'm dying to hear this. If youyr a paid troll to discredit theory's by conservatives like me, you have a big battle on your hands cause the videos have all been saved.Thank you. I was a long term member before, I apparently forgot my password so just made a new account. I quit coming on here because of internet experts like you, but I still come on and lurk around hunting season to see how others are doing, this topic peaked my interest. I've read plenty of threads with your hard headed comments, and don't need to get into any argument with you, I simply stated my opinion and stand by it. It is not far fetched to me, for a guy with several ARs equipped with bump fire stocks and stacks of 60 round mags to fire 600 rounds (only 10 mag changes) in the neighborhood of 11 minutes. A trained expert (like yourself) could have killed thousands; a scary thought. Watch the video at the two spots I mentioned and tell me your opinion... instead you don't even take the time to listen and tell me what you think is being heard.
Quote from: DIYARCHERYJUNKIE on October 10, 2017, 11:06:50 AMWithin the room is far fetched. The guy running to the other room is even more far fetched. 50 yards down the building is not going to be that soft of a thud. it would still be very loud. The video evidence is undisputable and if questions aren't answered a lot more people will be watching alex jones and distrusting the feds. You are obviously convinced of this opinion, and you are entitled to be so. I have seen so many conspiracy theories thrown about on this, and on other instances, by so-called experts using limited bodies of evidence, that I prefer to retain an open mind until all trustworthy evidence forecloses all but one or two reasonable explanations. We are not there yet, not by a long shot.
Within the room is far fetched. The guy running to the other room is even more far fetched. 50 yards down the building is not going to be that soft of a thud. it would still be very loud. The video evidence is undisputable and if questions aren't answered a lot more people will be watching alex jones and distrusting the feds.
Quote from: DIYARCHERYJUNKIE on October 10, 2017, 11:12:30 AMQuote from: weatherbow21 on October 10, 2017, 09:58:47 AMQuote from: DIYARCHERYJUNKIE on October 09, 2017, 12:18:22 PMQuote from: fish vacuum on October 08, 2017, 06:05:12 PMQuote from: DIYARCHERYJUNKIE on October 08, 2017, 04:48:37 AMDon't believe the AR Bump stock at all.I don't think that video is using the real audio from Las Vegas. The video from the taxi had much less consistent gunfire.Sent from my SM-J700T using TapatalkFigured you'd deny what's solid evidence. The taxi clip is not used for overlay in this video. The shooting went on for minutes. This video only used a long volley of rounds to compare the rate of fire. The sound clip used is from the same video on the left of the screen. I knew when I first heard the gunfire it was a lmg and I knew there was two shooting locations hundreds of yards apart at least. Loud gunfire then quiet gunfire hundreds of yards away. If you believe the FBI when they tell you on shooter ar anything bump fire or not then your a sheep. But you've proven that time and again and I have little faith you'll ever try to be diplomatic on topics so your opinion has little weight. You really think two shooters including a belt fed machine gun would have only killed 50-60 people in a crowd of 22,000? 11-12 minutes of shooting?Nice first post! Welcome to the site! I believe what I hear and see with my eyes from the undisputable video evidence... Please provide something that disputes the proof that has been recorded by hundreds. You really think that much killing was done with a AR-15 on some cheap $250.00 bump stock??? The rate of fire is way off. The multiple gunshots going off at different distances is undisputable. Please give me your analysis of what you hear and see in the above three videos... I'm dying to hear this. If youyr a paid troll to discredit theory's by conservatives like me, you have a big battle on your hands cause the videos have all been saved.Thank you. I was a long term member before, I apparently forgot my password so just made a new account. I quit coming on here because of internet experts like you, but I still come on and lurk around hunting season to see how others are doing, this topic peaked my interest. I've read plenty of threads with your hard headed comments, and don't need to get into any argument with you, I simply stated my opinion and stand by it. It is not far fetched to me, for a guy with several ARs equipped with bump fire stocks and stacks of 60 round mags to fire 600 rounds (only 10 mag changes) in the neighborhood of 11 minutes. A trained expert (like yourself) could have killed thousands; a scary thought.
Quote from: weatherbow21 on October 10, 2017, 09:58:47 AMQuote from: DIYARCHERYJUNKIE on October 09, 2017, 12:18:22 PMQuote from: fish vacuum on October 08, 2017, 06:05:12 PMQuote from: DIYARCHERYJUNKIE on October 08, 2017, 04:48:37 AMDon't believe the AR Bump stock at all.I don't think that video is using the real audio from Las Vegas. The video from the taxi had much less consistent gunfire.Sent from my SM-J700T using TapatalkFigured you'd deny what's solid evidence. The taxi clip is not used for overlay in this video. The shooting went on for minutes. This video only used a long volley of rounds to compare the rate of fire. The sound clip used is from the same video on the left of the screen. I knew when I first heard the gunfire it was a lmg and I knew there was two shooting locations hundreds of yards apart at least. Loud gunfire then quiet gunfire hundreds of yards away. If you believe the FBI when they tell you on shooter ar anything bump fire or not then your a sheep. But you've proven that time and again and I have little faith you'll ever try to be diplomatic on topics so your opinion has little weight. You really think two shooters including a belt fed machine gun would have only killed 50-60 people in a crowd of 22,000? 11-12 minutes of shooting?Nice first post! Welcome to the site! I believe what I hear and see with my eyes from the undisputable video evidence... Please provide something that disputes the proof that has been recorded by hundreds. You really think that much killing was done with a AR-15 on some cheap $250.00 bump stock??? The rate of fire is way off. The multiple gunshots going off at different distances is undisputable. Please give me your analysis of what you hear and see in the above three videos... I'm dying to hear this. If youyr a paid troll to discredit theory's by conservatives like me, you have a big battle on your hands cause the videos have all been saved.
Quote from: DIYARCHERYJUNKIE on October 09, 2017, 12:18:22 PMQuote from: fish vacuum on October 08, 2017, 06:05:12 PMQuote from: DIYARCHERYJUNKIE on October 08, 2017, 04:48:37 AMDon't believe the AR Bump stock at all.I don't think that video is using the real audio from Las Vegas. The video from the taxi had much less consistent gunfire.Sent from my SM-J700T using TapatalkFigured you'd deny what's solid evidence. The taxi clip is not used for overlay in this video. The shooting went on for minutes. This video only used a long volley of rounds to compare the rate of fire. The sound clip used is from the same video on the left of the screen. I knew when I first heard the gunfire it was a lmg and I knew there was two shooting locations hundreds of yards apart at least. Loud gunfire then quiet gunfire hundreds of yards away. If you believe the FBI when they tell you on shooter ar anything bump fire or not then your a sheep. But you've proven that time and again and I have little faith you'll ever try to be diplomatic on topics so your opinion has little weight. You really think two shooters including a belt fed machine gun would have only killed 50-60 people in a crowd of 22,000? 11-12 minutes of shooting?
Quote from: fish vacuum on October 08, 2017, 06:05:12 PMQuote from: DIYARCHERYJUNKIE on October 08, 2017, 04:48:37 AMDon't believe the AR Bump stock at all.I don't think that video is using the real audio from Las Vegas. The video from the taxi had much less consistent gunfire.Sent from my SM-J700T using TapatalkFigured you'd deny what's solid evidence. The taxi clip is not used for overlay in this video. The shooting went on for minutes. This video only used a long volley of rounds to compare the rate of fire. The sound clip used is from the same video on the left of the screen. I knew when I first heard the gunfire it was a lmg and I knew there was two shooting locations hundreds of yards apart at least. Loud gunfire then quiet gunfire hundreds of yards away. If you believe the FBI when they tell you on shooter ar anything bump fire or not then your a sheep. But you've proven that time and again and I have little faith you'll ever try to be diplomatic on topics so your opinion has little weight.
Quote from: DIYARCHERYJUNKIE on October 08, 2017, 04:48:37 AMDon't believe the AR Bump stock at all.I don't think that video is using the real audio from Las Vegas. The video from the taxi had much less consistent gunfire.Sent from my SM-J700T using Tapatalk
Don't believe the AR Bump stock at all.
Aspect of the shooter and any obstructions in the sound's path can really change up the sound as heard. If you have had shots fired your way, it sounds louder than the shooter firing the opposite direction but from the same spot.
I figured by my other replies you'd see that I don't believe the guy was running to and from rooms or around the room the guns were in. Was there even guns in the second room? I haven't heard of shell casings or anything from the other room.
Quote from: DIYARCHERYJUNKIE on October 11, 2017, 07:30:44 AMI figured by my other replies you'd see that I don't believe the guy was running to and from rooms or around the room the guns were in. Was there even guns in the second room? I haven't heard of shell casings or anything from the other room. 0:47 seconds to 1:09 is 22 seconds. A sprint is not exactly required to cover that ground in a 1,700 sqft. (combined) suite. If he had designs to get the tanks to leak and/or cause an explosion/fire, or if the crowd started dispersing presenting less desirable targets, it would make sense to change positions.
Quote from: Fl0und3rz on October 11, 2017, 09:43:14 AMQuote from: DIYARCHERYJUNKIE on October 11, 2017, 07:30:44 AMI figured by my other replies you'd see that I don't believe the guy was running to and from rooms or around the room the guns were in. Was there even guns in the second room? I haven't heard of shell casings or anything from the other room. 0:47 seconds to 1:09 is 22 seconds. A sprint is not exactly required to cover that ground in a 1,700 sqft. (combined) suite. If he had designs to get the tanks to leak and/or cause an explosion/fire, or if the crowd started dispersing presenting less desirable targets, it would make sense to change positions. Seems like most here are really stretching. So you do agree that the soft shots heard from 47-57 are a completely different set of shots than the close ones at 1:09 and not echo from close shots that hadn't happened yet?
Quote from: Fl0und3rz on October 11, 2017, 09:43:14 AMQuote from: DIYARCHERYJUNKIE on October 11, 2017, 07:30:44 AMI figured by my other replies you'd see that I don't believe the guy was running to and from rooms or around the room the guns were in. Was there even guns in the second room? I haven't heard of shell casings or anything from the other room. 0:47 seconds to 1:09 is 22 seconds. A sprint is not exactly required to cover that ground in a 1,700 sqft. (combined) suite. If he had designs to get the tanks to leak and/or cause an explosion/fire, or if the crowd started dispersing presenting less desirable targets, it would make sense to change positions.47-57 long distance fire is still going. Then at 1:09 close gunfire. ten seconds to run to the other room. The map that was shown didn't Showa connecting suite. I remember the map showing seperate hall way entrances for each room and no connecting door. I have been wrong before though. Wouldn't be the first or the last time. Seems like most here are really stretching to determine a second shooter wasnt there. Seems pretty obvious to me. So you do agree that the soft shots heard from 47-57 are a completely different set of shots than the close ones at 1:09 and not echo from close shots that hadn't happened yet? Seen a few more videos that are pretty obvious too. Multiple guns at multiple locations firing at the same time.