collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Concealed Carry Privacy Bill HB 1623 Filed  (Read 2117 times)

Offline KillzElk

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 85
Concealed Carry Privacy Bill HB 1623 Filed
« on: March 02, 2009, 11:39:36 PM »
I posted this an an update but thought it needed a post of its own.

This from KTHV, "An Arkansas lawmaker wants to make the list of people with concealed handgun permits a secret, and punish those who publish the information.

Rep. Randy Stewart, D-Kirby, on Wednesday filed legislation that would make information on concealed-gun permit holders confidential and exempt from the state's open records law. Stewart, a former Olympic shooter who also is a concealed-carry permit instructor, proposed in the legislation that knowingly publishing the list be a misdemeanor punishable by up to $1,000 in fines and up to a year in prison.

Twenty-six states currently keep concealed-carry permit records confidential, according to the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence."

Brummett pulls one of his usual contradictory editorials on the matter. I like how Max says he feels he did the right thing and would do it again but still admits that he took it down out of some legitimate safety concerns. Huh? Doesn't that kind of make our case for us?

Hey Brummett - you don't have "a right" to know who's carrying a concealed firearm. Period.

The whole purpose behind conceaeld carry is the fact that in a society in which the criminals dont know who's armed everyone benefits. The list was published by an irresponsible publication who's sole intent was to intimidate and harrass, with no consideration given to anyone on the list who might face retribution by criminals, employers or neighbors nor was any consideration given to people who have a need to remain secret such as private detectives, security personel, retired police officers, and battered women who have orders of protection against an abusive ex or boyfriend. This list was not published to illustrate a larger point about revocation rates, inconsistancies, or as a public vetting of the information contained therein. There can be no legitimate reason as far as the ARCCA see's it to publishing en mass the full names and addresses of permit holders.

In addition to that recently the Arkansas House killed a bill in committee that would have made the criminal records of public officials available to the public, I find it incomprehensible that our government officials would seek to hide the records of criminals but allow a far more law abiding segment of Arkansas society to be treated like registered sex offenders.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Bear Season 2025 by bb76
[Today at 03:16:23 PM]


Skyline by Ricochet
[Today at 03:15:52 PM]


AUCTION: Custom knife by Alden Cole by Dan-o
[Today at 03:10:35 PM]


Velvet by Ricochet
[Today at 03:09:38 PM]


Still no bears by RockScar
[Today at 02:49:55 PM]


GROUSE 2025...the Season is looming! by Dave Workman
[Today at 12:54:35 PM]


Scope/mount options Ruger Ranch 5.56 by Westside88
[Today at 12:25:46 PM]


Anti-Snagging Rule ? by KNOPHISH
[Today at 11:29:59 AM]


Stone Glacier packs by pickardjw
[Today at 11:12:41 AM]


Cougar Tips by Deer slayer
[Today at 10:01:19 AM]


It's Starting by nwwanderer
[Today at 08:16:10 AM]


Beaver Traps 4 Sale by Katalla
[Today at 06:12:26 AM]


Koro Traps 4 Sale by Katalla
[Today at 05:29:58 AM]


Ten Years, and still plugging along by Dave Workman
[Today at 03:58:36 AM]


Bass Pro Strikes Again by Rat44
[Today at 02:59:17 AM]


Looking for a hunting partner by vincepnw
[Yesterday at 10:51:51 PM]


Lund Fisherman 1800 info/advice by lewy
[Yesterday at 08:43:58 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal