collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: 30-378 Weatherby ?  (Read 11341 times)

Offline need2huntmor

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 167
  • Location: Graham
Re: 30-378 Weatherby ?
« Reply #15 on: March 06, 2009, 08:42:16 AM »
Guy Eastman stated in EHJ last year that he was switching over to the .300 Weatherby Magnum.  He said he "used the .30-378, but finding ammo can be a challenge and the rifle is extremely heavy."

Just FYI.

Offline PacificNWhunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 3599
  • Location: Bonney Lake
Re: 30-378 Weatherby ?
« Reply #16 on: March 06, 2009, 09:00:29 AM »
It's a pretty heavy gun, my buddy has one but he does not seem to mind. He just started doing his own reloading because the ammo is so spendy. It's a tack driver too...he got a hand load worked up through the thompson shooting school. The thing is a shooter.

Offline Kent Hunter

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 687
Re: 30-378 Weatherby ?
« Reply #17 on: March 06, 2009, 01:23:16 PM »
My best friend and life long hunting partner bought a 30-378 last year. I shoot a Sako TRGS chambered in Lazzeroni Warbird (7.82 = .30 cal). My friend has not harvested any animals with the 30-378 yet. But is done tweeking it. He sent his scope in to Leupold to have the long range turrets put on. We have been to the range a few times so far and his rifle in a real shooter. I mentioned my Warbird because between it and the 30-378 they are literally neck and neck ballistics wise. I reload for both of us, so after the initial cost of brass, it really isn't that costly to shoot.
 

Offline haugenna

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 2205
Re: 30-378 Weatherby ?
« Reply #18 on: March 06, 2009, 06:22:40 PM »
It's a pretty heavy gun, my buddy has one but he does not seem to mind. He just started doing his own reloading because the ammo is so spendy. It's a tack driver too...he got a hand load worked up through the thompson shooting school. The thing is a shooter.

I have the Thompson scope on mine.  If I had to do it over again, i would do the turrets.

It weighs in at 10 lbs

PacificNWhunter.  tell your buddy if he needs brass , I have some for sale.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Spring! by baldopepper
[Today at 11:37:42 AM]


Colockum Archery Bull Tag by oldleclercrd
[Today at 11:24:46 AM]


Morels 26 by NOCK NOCK
[Today at 10:57:58 AM]


Springer season getting close, who's going by HntnFsh
[Today at 10:38:43 AM]


Lost in the Fog by Gonehuntin01
[Today at 09:15:11 AM]


Not fact checked, but I can relate. by NOCK NOCK
[Today at 06:46:40 AM]


Arrow preference by mburrows
[Today at 05:53:21 AM]


Muzzle loading shotguns? Educate me by Night goat
[Yesterday at 11:29:17 PM]


Curvy Damascus Utility Fighter by Ghost Hunter
[Yesterday at 04:56:08 PM]


Top recommended elk hunt gear items.... by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 04:49:55 PM]


New Zealand in May by WAcoyotehunter
[Yesterday at 02:52:38 PM]


CCW response to FWC Melanie Rowland's op-ed by 30.06
[Yesterday at 10:14:50 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal