collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: 30-378 Weatherby ?  (Read 11517 times)

Offline need2huntmor

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 167
  • Location: Graham
Re: 30-378 Weatherby ?
« Reply #15 on: March 06, 2009, 08:42:16 AM »
Guy Eastman stated in EHJ last year that he was switching over to the .300 Weatherby Magnum.  He said he "used the .30-378, but finding ammo can be a challenge and the rifle is extremely heavy."

Just FYI.

Offline PacificNWhunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 3599
  • Location: Bonney Lake
Re: 30-378 Weatherby ?
« Reply #16 on: March 06, 2009, 09:00:29 AM »
It's a pretty heavy gun, my buddy has one but he does not seem to mind. He just started doing his own reloading because the ammo is so spendy. It's a tack driver too...he got a hand load worked up through the thompson shooting school. The thing is a shooter.

Offline Kent Hunter

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 687
Re: 30-378 Weatherby ?
« Reply #17 on: March 06, 2009, 01:23:16 PM »
My best friend and life long hunting partner bought a 30-378 last year. I shoot a Sako TRGS chambered in Lazzeroni Warbird (7.82 = .30 cal). My friend has not harvested any animals with the 30-378 yet. But is done tweeking it. He sent his scope in to Leupold to have the long range turrets put on. We have been to the range a few times so far and his rifle in a real shooter. I mentioned my Warbird because between it and the 30-378 they are literally neck and neck ballistics wise. I reload for both of us, so after the initial cost of brass, it really isn't that costly to shoot.
 

Offline haugenna

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 2205
Re: 30-378 Weatherby ?
« Reply #18 on: March 06, 2009, 06:22:40 PM »
It's a pretty heavy gun, my buddy has one but he does not seem to mind. He just started doing his own reloading because the ammo is so spendy. It's a tack driver too...he got a hand load worked up through the thompson shooting school. The thing is a shooter.

I have the Thompson scope on mine.  If I had to do it over again, i would do the turrets.

It weighs in at 10 lbs

PacificNWhunter.  tell your buddy if he needs brass , I have some for sale.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Big game season proposals by hunter399
[Today at 02:23:13 PM]


2026 turkey season! by MADMAX
[Today at 02:08:57 PM]


Delay of commission investigation+Lorna Smith finally defending hunting??? by Bullkllr
[Today at 01:30:58 PM]


Any fans of the 35 Rem, 358 Win, 35 Whelen, 9.3x62, or 45-70? by Boss .300 winmag
[Today at 11:45:10 AM]


Laser engraving service in western washington by Goshawk
[Today at 09:35:51 AM]


Solar Generator by CP
[Today at 08:04:30 AM]


You Bear Slayers by bowman
[Today at 07:24:11 AM]


Turkey Fan/beard Plaques by fire*guy
[Today at 07:13:53 AM]


Spring Idaho by bearpaw
[Today at 06:06:31 AM]


Discretion !!! by JDHasty
[Today at 01:10:05 AM]


12th Annual 'Pull For Scouting' Clay Crushing Classic by high_hunter
[Yesterday at 10:19:11 PM]


Multi season elk by trophyhunt
[Yesterday at 08:20:51 PM]


Hoof rot by trophyhunt
[Yesterday at 07:59:40 PM]


Second Choice by CNELK
[Yesterday at 07:19:34 PM]


Question about hunting wilderness areas by Shawn Ryan
[Yesterday at 06:32:30 PM]


Now we wait(Montana) by huntandjeep
[Yesterday at 04:49:46 PM]


AR-15 and more by pianoman9701
[Yesterday at 03:13:21 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal