Free: Contests & Raffles.
Quote from: Humptulips on January 24, 2018, 06:11:29 PMIn the proposed changes for sealing bobcat, river otter, lynx and cougar there is this:WAC 220-400-050 Requirements for sealing of pelts and collectionof biological information for river otter, cougar, lynx, and bobcat.(1)It is unlawful to possess river otter, cougar, lynx, or bobcattaken in Washington without a department identification seal which hasbeen attached to the raw pelt, on or off the carcass, prior to thepelt sealing deadline.Should not this read after instead of prior. I've read this like 16 times and it seems wrong. I commented on it but would like to hear from someone else. Am I just reading it wrong?It makes sense to me, the identification seal must be attached before the deadline. Am I missing something?
In the proposed changes for sealing bobcat, river otter, lynx and cougar there is this:WAC 220-400-050 Requirements for sealing of pelts and collectionof biological information for river otter, cougar, lynx, and bobcat.(1)It is unlawful to possess river otter, cougar, lynx, or bobcattaken in Washington without a department identification seal which hasbeen attached to the raw pelt, on or off the carcass, prior to thepelt sealing deadline.Should not this read after instead of prior. I've read this like 16 times and it seems wrong. I commented on it but would like to hear from someone else. Am I just reading it wrong?
Quote from: lokidog on January 24, 2018, 09:12:29 PMQuote from: Humptulips on January 24, 2018, 06:11:29 PMIn the proposed changes for sealing bobcat, river otter, lynx and cougar there is this:WAC 220-400-050 Requirements for sealing of pelts and collectionof biological information for river otter, cougar, lynx, and bobcat.(1)It is unlawful to possess river otter, cougar, lynx, or bobcattaken in Washington without a department identification seal which hasbeen attached to the raw pelt, on or off the carcass, prior to thepelt sealing deadline.Should not this read after instead of prior. I've read this like 16 times and it seems wrong. I commented on it but would like to hear from someone else. Am I just reading it wrong?It makes sense to me, the identification seal must be attached before the deadline. Am I missing something?Let's eliminate some of the words and simplify it.(1)It is unlawful to possess river otter, lynx or bobcat without a seal prior to the pelt sealing deadline.That says to me they should have used after instead of prior.The way it reads you would be in violation the minute you take an otter or cat into possession.
Quote from: Antlershed on January 24, 2018, 03:25:00 PMAlso, no more buying OIL points for your kids. Proposal states you must complete hunters education before you can buy an application for the OIL’s.That's a good change. First thing I noticed that disappoints me is the reduction of youth moose tags from 18 to only 1. Just bad timing since this will be my daughter's first year to apply for permits.
Also, no more buying OIL points for your kids. Proposal states you must complete hunters education before you can buy an application for the OIL’s.
Looks like I will be spending my money for out of state tags from now on, pretty much done with this state.....
Quote from: Gamblin Guy on January 24, 2018, 08:59:23 PMLooks like I will be spending my money for out of state tags from now on, pretty much done with this state.....It is getting hard to justify spending money in this state when they waste so much money and continually fail to address issues important to sportsmen.
Quote from: bobcat on January 24, 2018, 03:30:45 PMQuote from: Antlershed on January 24, 2018, 03:25:00 PMAlso, no more buying OIL points for your kids. Proposal states you must complete hunters education before you can buy an application for the OIL’s.That's a good change. First thing I noticed that disappoints me is the reduction of youth moose tags from 18 to only 1. Just bad timing since this will be my daughter's first year to apply for permits.Other than out of your own greed to draw a tag, how is this a good change?
I sent in comments for the spring bear seasons. Proposed adding tags for the 200 GMU series and increasing number of tags in current units. Also suggested considering an OTC tag. Also voiced support 209 primers being legal.
Quote from: cougforester on January 24, 2018, 03:47:37 PMI sent in comments for the spring bear seasons. Proposed adding tags for the 200 GMU series and increasing number of tags in current units. Also suggested considering an OTC tag. Also voiced support 209 primers being legal.Looks like 209 primers will be legal.
Quote from: hughjorgan on January 24, 2018, 03:35:23 PMIf I read that right they eliminated all Yakima early season archery cow hunts for elk and took spikes away from the colockum guys. Looks like I am done with archery in this state if that happens.You are reading that right.Disappointing.
If I read that right they eliminated all Yakima early season archery cow hunts for elk and took spikes away from the colockum guys. Looks like I am done with archery in this state if that happens.
These proposals are a crockpot of *censored* stew. Taking away anger less opportunity in Yakima from archers but still providing for rifle and muzzleloader? Bumping, Nile and Rimrock added to Little Naches ghost town. You have to take it all away or nothing. This is absurd. Also how can you give out over 245 bull tags for bumping (all combined) but only 30 cow tags? This some sort of new QDMA for elk?Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk