collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: .300 BLK load thread  (Read 19931 times)

Offline yorketransport

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 3310
  • Location: Yelm
  • Preferred pronouns: were/was
Re: .300 BLK load thread
« Reply #60 on: January 24, 2018, 11:47:26 AM »
I bet it would have retained more weight if it hadn’t hit a sand bag. Sand will tear up a bullet.

Offline Biggerhammer

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 5142
  • Location: Central Washington
  • Powder, primer, bullet JUNKIE.
Re: .300 BLK load thread
« Reply #61 on: January 24, 2018, 11:56:54 AM »
Maybe a couple milk jugs full of water behind the gel block to catch the bullet?

Offline Yondering

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 504
  • Location: Sedro Woolley
Re: .300 BLK load thread
« Reply #62 on: January 24, 2018, 12:03:23 PM »
yep, more water jugs or wet paper to catch it.

That 125 SST is known to come apart a little easier than the 125gr NBT though, so that weight retention isn't too surprising and probably a good reflection of what it would do on impact with bone. That's why I recommended the Ballistic Tip or Barnes 110 black tip earlier.

Offline CP

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 7253
  • Location: Mukilteo
Re: .300 BLK load thread
« Reply #63 on: January 24, 2018, 12:20:58 PM »
I'll try a down loaded Barnes next with some water jugs as backup.


Offline Biggerhammer

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 5142
  • Location: Central Washington
  • Powder, primer, bullet JUNKIE.
Re: .300 BLK load thread
« Reply #64 on: January 24, 2018, 01:17:39 PM »
I'll try a down loaded Barnes next with some water jugs as backup.

I would like to see those results.

Offline Dan-o

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+30)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2010
  • Posts: 18486
Re: .300 BLK load thread
« Reply #65 on: January 24, 2018, 02:39:55 PM »
Cool testing series, CP.

Thanks much for sharing results as you go.
Member:   Yakstrakgutp (or whatever we are)
I love the BFRO!!!
I wonder how many people will touch their nose to their screen trying to read this...

Offline CP

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 7253
  • Location: Mukilteo
Re: .300 BLK load thread
« Reply #66 on: January 25, 2018, 11:30:49 AM »
Gel test #4 – 110g Barnes TAC-TX

Target velocity was 2014fps to simulate 150yards but again I came in a bit hot at 2080fps, so more like 125 yards.  1057 Ft-Lbs of energy.
Recovered weight = 107.5g.  Text book expansion.

I ended up using newspaper as the 1st backstop and the bullet penetrated the 13” of gel and was recovered about ˝” inch into the paper. 

The permanent wound cavity was quite a bit smaller both in diameter and length than the SST’s wound cavity.  Expansion started less than 2” into the gel and the major damage only went about 5”.  Considerably less overall damage than the SST produced. 

I haven’t formed any hard conclusions yet but it appears this is near the edge if not already beyond the effective range of this bullet.



Offline h20hunter

  • Trade Count: (+16)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2010
  • Posts: 20872
  • Location: Lake Stevens
Re: .300 BLK load thread
« Reply #67 on: January 25, 2018, 11:50:30 AM »
Very cool.

Offline Yondering

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 504
  • Location: Sedro Woolley
Re: .300 BLK load thread
« Reply #68 on: January 25, 2018, 01:12:30 PM »
I've tested that bullet down to 1600 fps with similar results to what you saw. It seems to give pretty consistent performance across a wide range, but like you saw it (and other mono bullets) aren't as explosive as a lead core. They do tend to penetrate pretty well despite the light weight. Barnes says it expands down to 1400 fps, and based on what I saw at 1600, I believe it.

Offline CP

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 7253
  • Location: Mukilteo
Re: .300 BLK load thread
« Reply #69 on: January 25, 2018, 03:22:42 PM »
yep, more water jugs or wet paper to catch it.

That 125 SST is known to come apart a little easier than the 125gr NBT though, so that weight retention isn't too surprising and probably a good reflection of what it would do on impact with bone. That's why I recommended the Ballistic Tip or Barnes 110 black tip earlier.

Midway now has the 125 Nolser BT in stock.  I think I'll give them a try next.


Offline CP

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 7253
  • Location: Mukilteo
Re: .300 BLK load thread
« Reply #70 on: January 27, 2018, 12:06:27 PM »
125g Speer TNT @2194 fps.  This one penetrated 4 or 5 inches then, boom,  :yike: blew pieces of gel everywhere.  Found the lead core and a hunk of jacket just outside the gel block and 3 other pieces of jacket in gel bits that I picked up.  Total weight of the bullet bits was 113g so I found most of them.  Messy clean up. 


Very thin jacket on this bullet - for varmints only.


« Last Edit: January 27, 2018, 12:23:18 PM by CP »

Offline Biggerhammer

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 5142
  • Location: Central Washington
  • Powder, primer, bullet JUNKIE.
Re: .300 BLK load thread
« Reply #71 on: January 27, 2018, 02:02:14 PM »
Great Rockchuck load!!!!!

Offline b23

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2010
  • Posts: 3327
  • Location: Spokane Wa.
Re: .300 BLK load thread
« Reply #72 on: January 27, 2018, 02:26:47 PM »
I've gotta quit looking at this thread because I've been jonesing for a 300 BLK.  I just can't decide if I want to get a shorty upper for my Sig MCX or a CZ 527 300 BLK.

Offline Biggerhammer

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 5142
  • Location: Central Washington
  • Powder, primer, bullet JUNKIE.
Re: .300 BLK load thread
« Reply #73 on: January 27, 2018, 03:04:30 PM »
I've gotta quit looking at this thread because I've been jonesing for a 300 BLK.  I just can't decide if I want to get a shorty upper for my Sig MCX or a CZ 527 300 BLK.

The 527 is cool.

Offline b23

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2010
  • Posts: 3327
  • Location: Spokane Wa.
Re: .300 BLK load thread
« Reply #74 on: January 27, 2018, 03:59:35 PM »
I've gotta quit looking at this thread because I've been jonesing for a 300 BLK.  I just can't decide if I want to get a shorty upper for my Sig MCX or a CZ 527 300 BLK.

The 527 is cool.

I think they're both pretty cool but the 527 would definitely be a lot more useful, that's for sure.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal