collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Idaho wolf control board seeks another $400K next year to kill problem wolves  (Read 6392 times)

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10657
funny then need money to kill them.. I think most of us would do this as a free service if offered here..... but again, wolves are an industry created for all involved to pad wallets.. from lawyers to LEO....
How do wolves pad the wallets of LEOs? I can't remember the last time a wolf paid me? Or any animal to that point  :o
Funding i would think.The wolf loving community has been shoveling money in all directions for it.I am certain that the LEO'S have gotten their hands on some of it from either more officers or just new equipment to cover their areas either way it is funding.
No additional funding for LEOs because of wolves in WA. In reality, there's less LEOs in "wolf country" then there were 20-30 years ago.

Offline wolfbait

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 9187
funny then need money to kill them.. I think most of us would do this as a free service if offered here..... but again, wolves are an industry created for all involved to pad wallets.. from lawyers to LEO....
How do wolves pad the wallets of LEOs? I can't remember the last time a wolf paid me? Or any animal to that point  :o
LEO's investigate predation on livestock-I was on a fresh wolf killed calf, LEO showed up to helped scott fitkin search for coyote tracks, anything but a wolf, they found a coyote track and came out with coyote kill. Even though there was fresh wolf scat and wolf tracks where the calf was first attack. So yep, LEO's do benefit from wolves.
Ok so LEOs do investigations, duh.

How exactly does the LEO benefit? They certainly aren't paid more.

As time goes on and there are less areas to hunt in WA, and more predator/human conflicts, will the responsibility of handling the calls go to LEO's? 

Offline Oh Mah

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2015
  • Posts: 6614
  • Location: region 3 Montana
funny then need money to kill them.. I think most of us would do this as a free service if offered here..... but again, wolves are an industry created for all involved to pad wallets.. from lawyers to LEO....
How do wolves pad the wallets of LEOs? I can't remember the last time a wolf paid me? Or any animal to that point  :o
Funding i would think.The wolf loving community has been shoveling money in all directions for it.I am certain that the LEO'S have gotten their hands on some of it from either more officers or just new equipment to cover their areas either way it is funding.
No additional funding for LEOs because of wolves in WA. In reality, there's less LEOs in "wolf country" then there were 20-30 years ago.
Are you saying that the wdfw leo's are not or were not given any new equipment to investigate or deal with wolf conflicts or wolf poaching at all?I find that very hard to believe.
"Boss of the woods"
(this is in reference to the biggie not me).

Offline nwwanderer

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 4805
Many county sheriffs have involvement with wolf issues, especially in the Midwest.  I predict the same will expand here beyond current involvement.  Great election subject for the northeast.

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10657
funny then need money to kill them.. I think most of us would do this as a free service if offered here..... but again, wolves are an industry created for all involved to pad wallets.. from lawyers to LEO....
How do wolves pad the wallets of LEOs? I can't remember the last time a wolf paid me? Or any animal to that point  :o
Funding i would think.The wolf loving community has been shoveling money in all directions for it.I am certain that the LEO'S have gotten their hands on some of it from either more officers or just new equipment to cover their areas either way it is funding.
No additional funding for LEOs because of wolves in WA. In reality, there's less LEOs in "wolf country" then there were 20-30 years ago.
Are you saying that the wdfw leo's are not or were not given any new equipment to investigate or deal with wolf conflicts or wolf poaching at all?I find that very hard to believe.
What new equipment would be needed? The metal detector that can find the bullet in the elk works just as good on a wolf.

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10657
funny then need money to kill them.. I think most of us would do this as a free service if offered here..... but again, wolves are an industry created for all involved to pad wallets.. from lawyers to LEO....
How do wolves pad the wallets of LEOs? I can't remember the last time a wolf paid me? Or any animal to that point  :o
LEO's investigate predation on livestock-I was on a fresh wolf killed calf, LEO showed up to helped scott fitkin search for coyote tracks, anything but a wolf, they found a coyote track and came out with coyote kill. Even though there was fresh wolf scat and wolf tracks where the calf was first attack. So yep, LEO's do benefit from wolves.
Ok so LEOs do investigations, duh.

How exactly does the LEO benefit? They certainly aren't paid more.
As time goes on and there are less areas to hunt in WA, and more predator/human conflicts, will the responsibility of handling the calls go to LEO's?
The WDFW Enforcement program has had a big change the past 5-10 for problem wildlife issues. It used to be that the LEOs would handle all of the calls (from the elk are eating my orchard to a cougar killing a mountain biker). Now the LEOs only get involved with the most serious incidents. The vast majority of the rest of the incidents are going to the "Wildlife Conflict Specialists" who tend to have more of a bio background then LE.

WDFW basically realized they don't need LEOs to handle the vast majority of problem wildlife calls and these calls take them away from stopping poachers.

Offline pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 45274
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • Mortgage Licenses in WA, ID, & OR NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
We should be looking to ID to understand how things will progress here in WA. It's a dire warning and so far, we've completely ignored it.
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace https://valoaneducator.tv/johnwallace-2014743

Offline wolfbait

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 9187
We should be looking to ID to understand how things will progress here in WA. It's a dire warning and so far, we've completely ignored it.

Sad difference between ID and WA is the people of Idaho voted out their pro-wolf people in IDFG, WA is different, we need to vote out the governor in order to change the outcome.

We already know what happen to the Lolo elk herd etc.

Offline wolfbait

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 9187
funny then need money to kill them.. I think most of us would do this as a free service if offered here..... but again, wolves are an industry created for all involved to pad wallets.. from lawyers to LEO....
How do wolves pad the wallets of LEOs? I can't remember the last time a wolf paid me? Or any animal to that point  :o
LEO's investigate predation on livestock-I was on a fresh wolf killed calf, LEO showed up to helped scott fitkin search for coyote tracks, anything but a wolf, they found a coyote track and came out with coyote kill. Even though there was fresh wolf scat and wolf tracks where the calf was first attack. So yep, LEO's do benefit from wolves.
Ok so LEOs do investigations, duh.

How exactly does the LEO benefit? They certainly aren't paid more.
As time goes on and there are less areas to hunt in WA, and more predator/human conflicts, will the responsibility of handling the calls go to LEO's?
The WDFW Enforcement program has had a big change the past 5-10 for problem wildlife issues. It used to be that the LEOs would handle all of the calls (from the elk are eating my orchard to a cougar killing a mountain biker). Now the LEOs only get involved with the most serious incidents. The vast majority of the rest of the incidents are going to the "Wildlife Conflict Specialists" who tend to have more of a bio background then LE.

WDFW basically realized they don't need LEOs to handle the vast majority of problem wildlife calls and these calls take them away from stopping poachers.


Probably aren't going to need too many LEO's before long, as the wolves continue to expand there won't be much left to poach.

It wasn't that long ago that a wildlife conflict specialist ruled on wolves attacking some dogs in the Methow, scott fitkin wanted to blame the attack on cougar, but the specialist said NO, as it was defiantly wolves. From my understanding the specialist said from then on there wasn't going to be anymore lying. Kind of gave everyone hope that WDF&wolves were going to start being honest.

 I do know that there have been several wolf attacks on dogs in the Methow that were never reported to the public, we only found out through people coming forward, and of course before the C. specialist came along the USFWS and WDFW both lied about livestock predation by wolves in the Methow.

Evidently the C. specialist does not go to all wolf predation sites, as it was scott fitkin and crew who lied about the wolf predation of a calf a few hundred yards outside of Twisp. So much for honesty.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Comment against Ski Resort expanding into Colockum elk/deer habitat by pickardjw
[Today at 08:55:32 AM]


Bearpaw Season 2025 by bearpaw
[Today at 08:47:12 AM]


Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal by bearpaw
[Today at 08:32:14 AM]


Weatherby Vanguard vs. Browning x bolt by bearhunter99
[Today at 08:31:45 AM]


West side antler buyers by PastorJoel
[Today at 08:27:28 AM]


2025 blacktail rut thread by dreadi
[Today at 08:09:53 AM]


Poll: Supreme Court will decide if 'habitual drug users' lose their gun rights by dwils233
[Today at 07:51:17 AM]


Where do the bulls go? by Rob
[Today at 07:45:50 AM]


Let’s see ur heavy pack out pics by fowl smacker
[Today at 06:27:55 AM]


Pack wheel by CP
[Today at 06:26:07 AM]


Anyone use game carts? by jhouckwsu
[Today at 05:59:36 AM]


GMU 368 Nasty Creek Rd Access (Gate) by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 09:36:40 PM]


FS Surbu BFG 50 by Tacticalhammer
[Yesterday at 09:36:18 PM]


E WA waterfowl guide by 92xj
[Yesterday at 09:13:44 PM]


Winthrop - Winter Range Road Closures by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 08:55:31 PM]


Mushroom ID Thread by MLHSN
[Yesterday at 08:50:05 PM]


No upland with dog during deer and elk season? by buglebuster
[Yesterday at 08:22:23 PM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by bigmacc
[Yesterday at 03:45:16 PM]


Mt. St. Helens Goat by Gonehuntin01
[Yesterday at 03:23:04 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal