collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: OIL applicant #'s 2016 - 2017  (Read 3284 times)

Offline Ghost Hunter

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 5402
  • Location: SW <-> NE
  • Groups: NRA Patron Life Member, RMEF Life, Sponser Member
OIL applicant #'s 2016 - 2017
« on: April 15, 2018, 09:09:05 AM »
Any Moose - 10% decrease to 56,761 applicants; Any ram - 10% increase to 38,842 applicants; Goat - less than 1% decrease to 30,726 applicants.

MS deer and elk applicants roughly 13,000.

Is this an indicator on number of out of state applicants for OIL's?
Economy failure = Too many people spending money they don't have on things they don't need to impress people they don't like.

Offline benhuntin

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2010
  • Posts: 2582
  • Location: NUNYA
Re: OIL applicant #'s 2016 - 2017
« Reply #1 on: April 15, 2018, 09:59:16 AM »
Indicator that Moose numbers and quality are going down.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If it aint broke, dont fix it.

Offline Fletch

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 634
  • Location: Moses Lake WA
Re: OIL applicant #'s 2016 - 2017
« Reply #2 on: April 16, 2018, 03:55:22 PM »
Charge for tags up front and you will see a marked decrease is my guess.

Offline X-Force

  • Solo Hunter
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 5569
Re: OIL applicant #'s 2016 - 2017
« Reply #3 on: April 16, 2018, 04:17:41 PM »
I think people are starting to realize that the species/category/points game is BS.

People get offended at nothing at all. So, speak your mind and be unapologetic.

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39202
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: OIL applicant #'s 2016 - 2017
« Reply #4 on: April 16, 2018, 04:21:04 PM »
Moose, bighorn sheep, and mountain goat permits should NEVER have been included in the point system. Not sure who ever would have thought it was good idea?

Offline npaull

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 1087
Re: OIL applicant #'s 2016 - 2017
« Reply #5 on: April 16, 2018, 04:27:25 PM »
bobcat can you expand on why? Genuine question, not setting up an argument. Thx.

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39202
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: OIL applicant #'s 2016 - 2017
« Reply #6 on: April 16, 2018, 04:38:41 PM »
Because there aren't nearly enough tags relative to the number of applicants every year to clear out those at the top.


Offline baker5150

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2012
  • Posts: 3287
  • Groups: Loser's Lounge - Lifetime Member
Re: OIL applicant #'s 2016 - 2017
« Reply #7 on: April 16, 2018, 04:44:05 PM »
Because there aren't nearly enough tags relative to the number of applicants every year to clear out those at the top.

You could say that about a lot of the draw tags.


Offline pd

  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2012
  • Posts: 2537
  • Location: Seattle?
Re: OIL applicant #'s 2016 - 2017
« Reply #8 on: April 16, 2018, 04:48:08 PM »
Because there aren't nearly enough tags relative to the number of applicants every year to clear out those at the top.

You could say that about a lot of the draw tags.

And that, my friends, is exactly the point!

If the "points system" does not result in a stable or diminishing number of applicants every year, then it is bound to fail.  The Washington points-for-special-hunts system is indeed a failure.

BobCat is right, in that moose/sheep/goats have ridiculously few tags compared to the number of hunters.  But the same is actually true for almost all categories of hunts.  The single exception that I can think of is the special draw for turkey.
Si vis pacem, para bellum

Offline Ghost Hunter

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 5402
  • Location: SW <-> NE
  • Groups: NRA Patron Life Member, RMEF Life, Sponser Member
Re: OIL applicant #'s 2016 - 2017
« Reply #9 on: April 16, 2018, 07:21:30 PM »
Moose, bighorn sheep, and mountain goat permits should NEVER have been included in the point system. Not sure who ever would have thought it was good idea?

And you shouldn't be able to apply without buying a license.   Or paying up front.  Or limit to one OIL app per year.  I know I would focus on one.  The numbers show more getting in than out of the game.  With 19-20 points, I'll keep playing until I can't remember to.
Economy failure = Too many people spending money they don't have on things they don't need to impress people they don't like.

Offline Ridgeratt

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 5903
  • IBEW 73 (Retired) Burden on the working class.
Re: OIL applicant #'s 2016 - 2017
« Reply #10 on: April 16, 2018, 07:25:34 PM »
Moose, bighorn sheep, and mountain goat permits should NEVER have been included in the point system. Not sure who ever would have thought it was good idea?

And you shouldn't be able to apply without buying a license.   Or paying up front.  Or limit to one OIL app per year.  I know I would focus on one.  The numbers show more getting in than out of the game.  With 19-20 points, I'll keep playing until I can't remember to.

You may have to zip tie a scabbard on the walker.

Offline Skillet

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+43)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 5824
  • Location: Sitka, AK
Re: OIL applicant #'s 2016 - 2017
« Reply #11 on: April 16, 2018, 07:33:09 PM »
Moose, bighorn sheep, and mountain goat permits should NEVER have been included in the point system. Not sure who ever would have thought it was good idea?

And you shouldn't be able to apply without buying a license.   Or paying up front.  Or limit to one OIL app per year.  I know I would focus on one.  The numbers show more getting in than out of the game.  With 19-20 points, I'll keep playing until I can't remember to.

You may have to zip tie a scabbard on the walker.

 :chuckle:

Nothing is going to change with the WA draws.   WDFW measures the success of the draw system only by the revenue generated.  Period.
KABOOM Count - 1

"The ocean is calling, and I must go."

"Does anyone know where the love of God goes, when the waves turn the minutes to hours?"
     - Gordon Lightfoot

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Non-Shoulder mount elk ideas by trophyhunt
[Today at 05:59:39 AM]


Crabbing at cornet bay? by RB
[Yesterday at 10:00:42 PM]


2025 Area 9 King Opener by RB
[Yesterday at 09:59:49 PM]


Winchester model 97 will not cycle by wadu1
[Yesterday at 09:18:02 PM]


AKC lab puppies! Born 06/10/2025 follow as they grow!!! by scottfrick
[Yesterday at 07:37:30 PM]


Air Dryer Cherries by Boss .300 winmag
[Yesterday at 07:10:14 PM]


AKC Australian Shepherd Puppies by TeacherMan
[Yesterday at 07:04:08 PM]


Area 11 2025 - Well? by huntnphool
[Yesterday at 04:42:10 PM]


8 year old attacked in 2023 ooops by shootnrun
[Yesterday at 04:23:14 PM]


Browning X Bolt sticky stock by JKEEN33
[Yesterday at 01:31:06 PM]


Mt. St. Helens Goat by CNELK
[Yesterday at 01:09:43 PM]


2025 Montana alternate list by tdot24
[Yesterday at 12:37:30 PM]


Bonaparte Lake by TeacherMan
[Yesterday at 10:17:00 AM]


Pocket Carry by hookr88
[Yesterday at 09:48:30 AM]


Grouse in Vail? by Alan K
[Yesterday at 09:28:46 AM]


Rabbits looking good so far! by Goshawk
[Yesterday at 09:16:08 AM]


Game scouting in Vail for 2025. Not looking too good so far. by Goshawk
[Yesterday at 09:04:01 AM]


Raffle ticket sales 2025 by JDArms1240
[Yesterday at 06:12:34 AM]


Good day of steelhead fishing! by huntnphool
[July 20, 2025, 10:49:23 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal