collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: 3pt or better law  (Read 2925 times)

Offline Westsideelkchaser

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Sep 2015
  • Posts: 64
  • Location: Some where on the westside
3pt or better law
« on: May 08, 2018, 09:24:06 PM »
So with the definition of 3pt or better it does not matter now if none of the points are above the ear just as long as it has 3pts on one side over an inch long each it is legal? I know I see spikes every year that have a bunch of little inch to two inch long nobs at the base that IF I am reading it correctly are now legal.

3 Point Minimum: A 3 Pt Min elk means that
a legal elk in these GMUs must have at
least 3 antler points on one side Eye guards
are antler points when they are at least one
inch long A 1x3 and a 2x3 are legal elk in
a 3 Pt Min unit Antler restrictions apply
to all hunters during any open season

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21860
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: 3pt or better law
« Reply #1 on: May 08, 2018, 09:44:33 PM »
The above the ear requirement has been removed.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline Westsideelkchaser

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Sep 2015
  • Posts: 64
  • Location: Some where on the westside
Re: 3pt or better law
« Reply #2 on: May 10, 2018, 03:08:50 PM »
Thats awesome should make it a little bit easier during archery season!

Offline hunter399

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 8974
  • Location: In Your Hunting Spot
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: 3pt or better law
« Reply #3 on: May 10, 2018, 03:28:35 PM »
I'm sure someone contested that above the ear ticket and won , wdfw figured they had to change it.

Offline dreamunelk

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 2049
Re: 3pt or better law
« Reply #4 on: May 10, 2018, 04:04:16 PM »
I'm sure someone contested that above the ear ticket and won , wdfw figured they had to change it.

Nope!

Offline JBar

  • The Family "Guide"
  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+17)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 2152
  • Location: Puyallup
Re: 3pt or better law
« Reply #5 on: May 10, 2018, 04:10:09 PM »
It's good to see the change, I brought this up last year after watching the game warden show. A kid shot an elk that had 3 pts but he got cited and his elk taken away. An eyeguard counts on a deer but not an elk!?  :bash: Glad it's been updated!!
Shut up and Hunt!

Offline hunter399

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 8974
  • Location: In Your Hunting Spot
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: 3pt or better law
« Reply #6 on: May 10, 2018, 04:23:28 PM »
I'm sure someone contested that above the ear ticket and won , wdfw figured they had to change it.

Nope!
Any reason to why they changed it ,besides it was stupid.
You seem to know the answer enlighten us.

Offline JBar

  • The Family "Guide"
  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+17)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 2152
  • Location: Puyallup
Re: 3pt or better law
« Reply #7 on: May 10, 2018, 04:32:02 PM »
Shut up and Hunt!

Offline hunter399

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 8974
  • Location: In Your Hunting Spot
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: 3pt or better law
« Reply #8 on: May 10, 2018, 04:46:33 PM »
So I went and looked at the link you put.
So your saying that some footage on tv may have made wdfw look bad ,and promted a rule change.
Thanks for link.

Offline JBar

  • The Family "Guide"
  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+17)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 2152
  • Location: Puyallup
Re: 3pt or better law
« Reply #9 on: May 10, 2018, 05:47:28 PM »
So I went and looked at the link you put.
So your saying that some footage on tv may have made wdfw look bad ,and promted a rule change.
Thanks for link.
Not what I was implying but that's pretty funny! I think the way the rule was written along with antler point definitions was getting folks into trouble unnecessarily.
Shut up and Hunt!

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Seekins PH3 by jrebel
[Today at 01:50:15 PM]


Post rut Whitetail grunt call by kodiak06
[Today at 01:49:53 PM]


Blue Tongue and EHD outbreak in NE Washington by HillHound
[Today at 01:42:33 PM]


Fishing the East Cape in Baja? by cohoho
[Today at 01:40:34 PM]


Smelt ? by Trapper John
[Today at 12:46:41 PM]


Real world feedback needed: Rangefinder Binos by teanawayslayer
[Today at 12:14:33 PM]


One of my Wowzhers by 30.06
[Today at 09:38:32 AM]


LINCOLN !! by cryder
[Today at 08:16:43 AM]


Thanksgiving duck hunt by ASHQUACK
[Today at 07:18:13 AM]


2025 15th Annual Hunting-Washington Christmas Gift Exchange by wadu1
[Today at 06:36:01 AM]


121 Quality November 20-24 by hunter399
[Today at 04:19:14 AM]


What are you cooking? by EnglishSetter
[Today at 12:36:52 AM]


Shout out to bad-ss outdoor gear! by buglebuster
[Yesterday at 11:08:18 PM]


Illinois, No Doubter by Birdguy
[Yesterday at 07:14:46 PM]


How to change email? by boneaddict
[Yesterday at 07:11:41 PM]


Late Alta Muzzy by Schmalzfam
[Yesterday at 05:10:16 PM]


Canning Wild Game by Whitpirate
[Yesterday at 04:24:26 PM]


Big old and heavy by Pathfinder101
[Yesterday at 02:32:30 PM]


Pepper Jack tillimook by Fidelk
[Yesterday at 02:30:19 PM]


What boots? by fishngamereaper
[Yesterday at 10:46:03 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal