Free: Contests & Raffles.
If people on the Eastside showed up to vote, we could get this reversed.
Quote from: Rainier10 on June 01, 2018, 10:30:24 AMIt seems to me the best avenue would be a legal challenge to the original initiative. going that route you are dealing with the courts not the general public. doing and initiative and voting is a long shot IMO.legal challenge would entail legal counsel and thus $$$ correct?
It seems to me the best avenue would be a legal challenge to the original initiative. going that route you are dealing with the courts not the general public. doing and initiative and voting is a long shot IMO.
I think the west side has to stew in their own juices for a while longer. *If* they (we) ever vote in a good conservative governor then I'll have hope for game management rules.
Quote from: KFhunter on June 01, 2018, 10:50:13 AMI think the west side has to stew in their own juices for a while longer. *If* they (we) ever vote in a good conservative governor then I'll have hope for game management rules. They like their own juices. It's free juice for many of them. The Ds are growing their voter base with freebies and fairy tales of Utopia and rainbow-colored puppies. These are the same people that will march to the drumbeat of the oppressive government our forefathers warned us about. If you think voting on this now would turn out better than it did 22 years ago, you haven't been paying attention to the northbound CA license plates and spike in patchouli sales. The increase in people who are really ignorant about scientific wildlife management (including in our own DFW) is shocking.
Quote from: B4noon on June 01, 2018, 10:37:29 AMIt may actually be the perfect time to propose a new revised initiative especially as WDFW is starting to meddle in grizzly rehab would make perfect sense to bait and get a positive ID on a bear before shooting and the anti's and the liberals might meet in the middle if they were educated about harvest of bears is going to happen regardless so let's compromise and allow baiting so that there is selective harvest instead of accidently shooting Boo boos momIt makes sense to you and I. It would never fly with animal rights groups. They'd come back with a proposal to end all bear hunting to keep the grizzlies safe.
It may actually be the perfect time to propose a new revised initiative especially as WDFW is starting to meddle in grizzly rehab would make perfect sense to bait and get a positive ID on a bear before shooting and the anti's and the liberals might meet in the middle if they were educated about harvest of bears is going to happen regardless so let's compromise and allow baiting so that there is selective harvest instead of accidently shooting Boo boos mom
lunacy!or is it? spring bear is already prohibited in grizzly areas...
lunacy!or is it? try to get a spring bear tag for 113 Selkirk....Look at what WDFW did to night hunting bobcats in lynx recovery zones
I don't think it'll go that far, if you remember the latest proposals it included a grizzly identification test but no reduction in black bear hunts or hints of reducing hunt opportunities in grizzly zones.
all bets are off, supposedly one lynx got shot at night, so we get a new rule prohibiting night hunting for bobcat