Free: Contests & Raffles.
Why doesn’t WDFW create a permit for a cougar hound hunt? Give one or two out each year for the entire state, winner can use whichever hound guy he wants. Generates revenue and gets rid of a cat or two.
Because it's
Quote from: D-Rock425 on June 12, 2018, 12:53:39 PMBecause it's No matter how you phrase it, it's still illegal in WA.
Quote from: ctwiggs1 on June 12, 2018, 01:24:46 PMQuote from: D-Rock425 on June 12, 2018, 12:53:39 PMBecause it's No matter how you phrase it, it's still illegal in WA. They could get it done if they wanted to, it would simply go under "management".
Quote from: huntnphool on June 12, 2018, 01:32:10 PMQuote from: ctwiggs1 on June 12, 2018, 01:24:46 PMQuote from: D-Rock425 on June 12, 2018, 12:53:39 PMBecause it's No matter how you phrase it, it's still illegal in WA. They could get it done if they wanted to, it would simply go under "management".Didn't they have a hunt like that a few years ago? I thought Charlie (the taxidermist) drew it and killed a big cat. Then they had to stop it because WDFW decided it was illegal (?)... May be my sketchy memory, but I seem to remember putting in for a special draw cat hunt...
With the cougar attack fresh on people's minds, an initiative getting rid of that ban could go thru.
States want state rights from Federal jurisdiction, can county get county rights from under state jurisdiction, because I think there were only two counties that voted out hounds if you know what I mean
Another good question is why don't they sell permits for baiting bears in Washington. Make it residents only and make it like $50 a pop with rules like bait sites have to be x amount of yards apart and limit of 2 or 3 sites. That would bring extra money into their budget and bring down a LOT of bears I bet!
Quote from: W_Ellison2011 on June 13, 2018, 05:10:54 PMAnother good question is why don't they sell permits for baiting bears in Washington. Make it residents only and make it like $50 a pop with rules like bait sites have to be x amount of yards apart and limit of 2 or 3 sites. That would bring extra money into their budget and bring down a LOT of bears I bet!
I hate to say never but I’d be absolutely amazed if in my lifetime hound hunting or baiting ever returned to Washington. If fish and game actually wanted to reduce cougar populations they’d remove all quotas and could even go a step further of opening the season to all year.
Quote from: meatwhack on June 14, 2018, 03:53:31 PMI hate to say never but I’d be absolutely amazed if in my lifetime hound hunting or baiting ever returned to Washington. If fish and game actually wanted to reduce cougar populations they’d remove all quotas and could even go a step further of opening the season to all year.Bingo!, I agree that we probably will never see baiting or hounds brought back and as far as expanding quotas and going with year round seasons to make a dent in these deer killers the WDFW has too many special interest groups to take care of, taking care of our game herds is down the priority list...with all due respect meatwack, please don't refer to them as "fish and game", they are far from it, as far as representing our Fish and Game ...
Quote from: bigmacc on June 14, 2018, 04:03:32 PMQuote from: meatwhack on June 14, 2018, 03:53:31 PMI hate to say never but I’d be absolutely amazed if in my lifetime hound hunting or baiting ever returned to Washington. If fish and game actually wanted to reduce cougar populations they’d remove all quotas and could even go a step further of opening the season to all year.Bingo!, I agree that we probably will never see baiting or hounds brought back and as far as expanding quotas and going with year round seasons to make a dent in these deer killers the WDFW has too many special interest groups to take care of, taking care of our game herds is down the priority list...with all due respect meatwack, please don't refer to them as "fish and game", they are far from it, as far as representing our Fish and Game ... Washington "Department of Game" became the "Department of Wildlife" in 1987, and in 1994 became the "Department of Fish and Wildlife." The state hasn't had a "Game Department" for more than 30 years.
Quote from: meatwhack on June 14, 2018, 03:53:31 PMI hate to say never but I’d be absolutely amazed if in my lifetime hound hunting or baiting ever returned to Washington. If fish and game actually wanted to reduce cougar populations they’d remove all quotas and could even go a step further of opening the season to all year.They tried, and much to the delight of HSUS the governor vetoed the plan.https://blog.humanesociety.org/2015/10/washington-gov-nixes-cougar-killing-plan.html
I like how that article states “let’s be clear nobody eats cougar”. I must be an alien because I’ve eaten it and thought it was pretty good. It’s never good when you put wildlife management out for public vote especially in a state with such a large population of anti hunters.
Quote from: meatwhack on June 14, 2018, 04:04:12 PMI like how that article states “let’s be clear nobody eats cougar”. I must be an alien because I’ve eaten it and thought it was pretty good. It’s never good when you put wildlife management out for public vote especially in a state with such a large population of anti hunters.I think it might help our cause if some hunting groups petitioned the Commission to make the wastage laws apply to cougar.What do you think? I might start a poll.