Free: Contests & Raffles.
I dont know that I’ll ever have anything officially scored but the number does put some perspective to the size. While both could be “big 4 points” there is a difference between a 150 inch buck and a 180.
Quote from: elkaholic123 on July 26, 2018, 05:23:35 PMQuote from: Rainier10 on July 26, 2018, 02:09:06 PMQuote from: elkaholic123 on July 26, 2018, 01:29:10 PMQuote from: muleyslayer on July 26, 2018, 12:33:05 PMQuote from: elkaholic123 on July 26, 2018, 11:45:51 AMWa. buck 2012It looks like a 160 ish buck, but a very nice buck I would be happy withIt scored 162 162 net or gross? That had to be net.I love the heavy deep forks and the split g3's are awesome.165 1/8 n/t162 2/8 gross typ Love it when guys are honest with their scores! And that's to say previous posts are not honest, I just appreciate a guy that takes the time to get a legit score and not embellish it, or add in the widest spread.
Quote from: Rainier10 on July 26, 2018, 02:09:06 PMQuote from: elkaholic123 on July 26, 2018, 01:29:10 PMQuote from: muleyslayer on July 26, 2018, 12:33:05 PMQuote from: elkaholic123 on July 26, 2018, 11:45:51 AMWa. buck 2012It looks like a 160 ish buck, but a very nice buck I would be happy withIt scored 162 162 net or gross? That had to be net.I love the heavy deep forks and the split g3's are awesome.165 1/8 n/t162 2/8 gross typ
Quote from: elkaholic123 on July 26, 2018, 01:29:10 PMQuote from: muleyslayer on July 26, 2018, 12:33:05 PMQuote from: elkaholic123 on July 26, 2018, 11:45:51 AMWa. buck 2012It looks like a 160 ish buck, but a very nice buck I would be happy withIt scored 162 162 net or gross? That had to be net.I love the heavy deep forks and the split g3's are awesome.
Quote from: muleyslayer on July 26, 2018, 12:33:05 PMQuote from: elkaholic123 on July 26, 2018, 11:45:51 AMWa. buck 2012It looks like a 160 ish buck, but a very nice buck I would be happy withIt scored 162
Quote from: elkaholic123 on July 26, 2018, 11:45:51 AMWa. buck 2012It looks like a 160 ish buck, but a very nice buck I would be happy with
Wa. buck 2012
It's definitely not rocket science. Get a good tape, cable, and score sheet. READ the scoring instructions and follow the steps. Lots of folks say who cares about score but I think it's fun to put a tape on em. Big, small, typical, non typical. They are all different and unique. I can't hardly look at a deer without putting the eyecrometer to them.
Quote from: Hockey21 on July 26, 2018, 07:55:51 AMQuote from: jjhunter on July 25, 2018, 06:54:50 PMHere is a tough one. 22” outside with a giant head/body.Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkBoth of ours scored the same. It would be cool to put them side by side and see if theres much difference. if love to see the numbers breakdown on your buck Hockey. I have a pretty sharp scoring eye and I couldn't even come close to 185. I'd love to see where I short changed him. Do you have any pics where it's not so distorted from being so close to the camera?
Quote from: jjhunter on July 25, 2018, 06:54:50 PMHere is a tough one. 22” outside with a giant head/body.Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkBoth of ours scored the same. It would be cool to put them side by side and see if theres much difference.
Here is a tough one. 22” outside with a giant head/body.Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Quote from: Hockey21 on July 26, 2018, 09:14:57 AMI suck at scoring. Its all good. LOL. I look at some pics of bucks and I just don't get where they got the score. Here's another pic, but it kinda sucks also. I thought this post/pic was really interesting because in the big pic that buck looks really nice...........But in your avatar the same buck looks way bigger. At least to me.(Great buck. Love the mass.)
I suck at scoring. Its all good. LOL. I look at some pics of bucks and I just don't get where they got the score. Here's another pic, but it kinda sucks also.
Quote from: Karl Blanchard on July 26, 2018, 08:29:59 AMQuote from: Hockey21 on July 26, 2018, 07:55:51 AMQuote from: jjhunter on July 25, 2018, 06:54:50 PMHere is a tough one. 22” outside with a giant head/body.Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkBoth of ours scored the same. It would be cool to put them side by side and see if theres much difference. if love to see the numbers breakdown on your buck Hockey. I have a pretty sharp scoring eye and I couldn't even come close to 185. I'd love to see where I short changed him. Do you have any pics where it's not so distorted from being so close to the camera?Karl, here is the score sheet. I said 185, but he was actually 183 4/8 gross and 173 4/8 net. Nets are for fishing!!He looks pretty symmetrical, but i was deducted 10 pts. That extra G1 didn't help either. But he is awesome to look at and a once in a lifetime buck for me.
Quote from: Dan-o on July 26, 2018, 10:24:44 PMQuote from: Hockey21 on July 26, 2018, 09:14:57 AMI suck at scoring. Its all good. LOL. I look at some pics of bucks and I just don't get where they got the score. Here's another pic, but it kinda sucks also. I thought this post/pic was really interesting because in the big pic that buck looks really nice...........But in your avatar the same buck looks way bigger. At least to me.(Great buck. Love the mass.)Thanks Dan-o. Its the same buck. It's weird how a buck in one pic can look way different than another pic just by the angle, lighting, distance, etc.