Free: Contests & Raffles.
Isnt it obvious. Outdoor woman are hot, and anyone that can climb 30 feet into a tree has to be athletic. THey just want to contact her to see if she shaves her pits or not.
Quote from: jackelope on July 19, 2018, 11:11:18 AMI'd wonder if all the people wanting to know who she was and who she worked for would post in this thread their name, their job and the location where they live. Especially any of those who work for the government.This is not really a pertinent analogy though. She's a public employee as well as being involved in a rescue operation which was reported by the news and investigated by the county sheriff. I don't see any parallel between her situation and someone taking part in an online forum.
I'd wonder if all the people wanting to know who she was and who she worked for would post in this thread their name, their job and the location where they live. Especially any of those who work for the government.
I don't care who she is, or what she was doing. The fact is that she was in a tree with threatening wolves below, witnessed by the helicopter crew. The wolves were clearly a threat to human life and need to be taken out. The issues with the different agencies involved and who did what need to be dealt with for sure, but as to the who was in the tree and what they were doing makes no difference to me. Wolves were after a person and they need to be put down. They have tracking info on a collared wolf indicating the pack involved, go get them.
Quote from: pianoman9701 on July 19, 2018, 12:43:11 PMQuote from: jackelope on July 19, 2018, 11:11:18 AMI'd wonder if all the people wanting to know who she was and who she worked for would post in this thread their name, their job and the location where they live. Especially any of those who work for the government.This is not really a pertinent analogy though. She's a public employee as well as being involved in a rescue operation which was reported by the news and investigated by the county sheriff. I don't see any parallel between her situation and someone taking part in an online forum. Just because you are part of a rescue operation doesn't mean your name needs to be plastered everywhere. As for the sheriff's "investigation" it's political and not legally based. There's no law that says the sheriff (or any LE agency) has to investigate what happened. The sheriff is simply going on along the "public safety" route, well there's no law that says you have to ID yourself when an agency is investigating something for "public safety" reasons.Heck, I'm sure she probably got cut up and may have some psychological issues from this, hello HIPPA protection.
Ill spice this up a bit. Utah passed a law making it ok to relocate wolves out of state, listing USFWS as a funding source for this activity. Coincidence this gal is from Utah?
I don't think these particular wolves are any different than other wolves. I bet in the same scenario, just a different location and different wolves, the same thing would've happened. So if these wolves need to be killed because of what they did, then all wolves need to be killed. Kind of like, in my opinion, ALL wolves will kill livestock if given the opportunity.
Quote from: bigtex on July 19, 2018, 02:29:03 PMQuote from: pianoman9701 on July 19, 2018, 12:43:11 PMQuote from: jackelope on July 19, 2018, 11:11:18 AMI'd wonder if all the people wanting to know who she was and who she worked for would post in this thread their name, their job and the location where they live. Especially any of those who work for the government.This is not really a pertinent analogy though. She's a public employee as well as being involved in a rescue operation which was reported by the news and investigated by the county sheriff. I don't see any parallel between her situation and someone taking part in an online forum. Just because you are part of a rescue operation doesn't mean your name needs to be plastered everywhere. As for the sheriff's "investigation" it's political and not legally based. There's no law that says the sheriff (or any LE agency) has to investigate what happened. The sheriff is simply going on along the "public safety" route, well there's no law that says you have to ID yourself when an agency is investigating something for "public safety" reasons.Heck, I'm sure she probably got cut up and may have some psychological issues from this, hello HIPPA protection.Well, that's what usually happens when the government has to spend thousands of dollars to go rescue someone out of the wilderness. Personally, I don't care who she is as long as we can get to the bottom of the story. That's where the rub is. Without knowing who she is, we're going to have a hard time pinpointing the responsible department and exactly what they were doing there and why they whisked her away before the local authorities had a chance to question her for information which could be used to keep locals safe. It certainly wasn't a salmon count and it was handled oddly.