collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Washington General Season Deer Harvest: 1997-2017  (Read 10073 times)

Offline X-Force

  • Solo Hunter
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 5567
Re: Washington General Season Deer Harvest: 1997-2017
« Reply #45 on: July 24, 2018, 02:03:00 PM »
special permits
shifting units from permit only to OTC
adding or eliminating late season hunting
adding or reducing antlerless harvest

Just this year WDFW cut antlerless moose harvest way back by eliminating antlerless tags and eliminating the any moose and making it bull only. WDFW also wanted to eliminate OTC archery antlerless elk hunting in the colockum, hunters complained and now we have a split season.

If you don't see managers doing something its because you don't care to look.

Predators are an issue but encroachment on habitat and forestry practices are the number one issue.

Its hard to have good forestry practices when logging has the threat of lawsuits and other practices (controlled burns, invasive species eradication, habitat restoration, etc.) are in the same budge as wild land fire suppression.

For habitat to improve a different budge/revenue stream will need to be found to deal with fire related issues.
People get offended at nothing at all. So, speak your mind and be unapologetic.

Offline Rainier10

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 15970
  • Location: Over the edge
Re: Washington General Season Deer Harvest: 1997-2017
« Reply #46 on: July 24, 2018, 02:08:41 PM »
You’re correct I forgot the addition of the couple days at the end of general season for most east side hunts. To me that would suggest they felt the population was doing well which from what I’ve seen from 30 years or so of experience in some of the areas isn’t true. A lot of areas have seen drastic reductions in deer numbers but that’s just what I’ve noticed not anything scientific.
I hear ya on that.  I often question what they do and why they do it.  They are pretty open about it if asked.  Do I agree with the explanation or reasoning?  Not always but at least I know what they were basing their decision on.

I went to one of the town hall meetings in Federal Way years ago.  Dave Ware was there and a guy took a petition to him about elk hunting in a certain gmu and how he wanted the season changed and he had hundreds of signatures agreeing with his position.  Dave listened intently, asked a few questions and then asked if he could have a copy of the signatures and petition.  The guy said no problem and gave him the copy.  He then assured Dave that they were real signatures.  Dave said he didn't doubt that at all.  He said he was just going to take a random sampling of the names, punch them into the WDFW system and make sure that they had purchased a hunting license and specifically an elk tag in the past.  No point in changing a season for people that don't even hunt.  He was really looking out for us as hunters was my impression.  I know Dave Ware gets a bad wrap on here but that is one example that I saw personally that made me think they do have the hunter's interest in mind when making decisions.

FYI the guy started stumbling on his words and said well these are people that live in the area so they know best even if they don't hunt.  Pretty sure Dave was spot on with his thought of verifying who was on that petition.
« Last Edit: July 24, 2018, 02:14:10 PM by Rainier10 »
Pain is temporary, achieving the goal is worth it.

I didn't say it would be easy, I said it would be worth it.

Every father should remember that one day his children will follow his example instead of his advice.


The views and opinions expressed in this post are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of HuntWa or the site owner.

Offline meatwhack

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 1063
Re: Washington General Season Deer Harvest: 1997-2017
« Reply #47 on: July 24, 2018, 02:14:45 PM »
I also want to say I’m not ragging on F&G for how they manage or the decisions they make I’m just throwing out what I’ve observed over the years.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Idaho 2025 Controlled Hunts by phildobaggins
[Today at 11:31:27 AM]


Muzzy Mission Quality!!! by NOCK NOCK
[Today at 11:26:18 AM]


Cowiche Quality Buck by OutHouse
[Today at 11:22:45 AM]


FFL preferences or warnings in Olympia or south Sound area? by Knocker of rocks
[Today at 11:07:04 AM]


I'm Going To Need Karl To Come up With That 290 Muley Sunscreen Bug Spray Combo by Karl Blanchard
[Today at 10:58:40 AM]


2025 OILS! by Beastmonger1987
[Today at 10:54:50 AM]


Bow mount trolling motors by Happy Gilmore
[Today at 10:22:59 AM]


Getting back into dogs by Machias
[Today at 10:05:45 AM]


49 degrees north late Moose tag by vandeman17
[Today at 09:05:21 AM]


Stillaguamish 448 QD rifle tag by jason stevens
[Today at 09:05:09 AM]


Bear behavior by dylan34_36
[Today at 08:51:28 AM]


Idaho Unit 31 Late Rifle! by Sliverslinger
[Today at 08:36:10 AM]


Machias' 2025 Spring Bear/Northern Idaho by Machias
[Today at 07:52:44 AM]


Norway pass Elk by hunterednate
[Today at 07:44:13 AM]


Early controlled hunt rifle tag Lemhi Range by Shooter4
[Today at 07:29:56 AM]


Toutle Quality Bull - Rifle by RB
[Today at 03:13:07 AM]


Boat registration by Happy Gilmore
[Yesterday at 10:22:29 PM]


Norway Pass Archery Elk 2025 by Boss .300 winmag
[Yesterday at 09:14:45 PM]


Entiat Quality tag by WAcoueshunter
[Yesterday at 09:05:06 PM]


Palouse/Mica (GMU 127) Access for Trades Work by dr.derek
[Yesterday at 08:29:53 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal