Eric Church

[Rainier10]

All I am saying is the is a difference between “nobody should have that many AR’s and ammo” and “nobody should have that many AR’ and ammo and we not know about it.”

I personally think the first statement is more extreme saying you can’t even have it. The second is not as extreme. The second statement is what he actually said, the first is what yahoo wants you to here. Do I agree with either? No. Do I think if you’re quoting someone you should not just pick the fragments that make the narrative you want portrayed? No.

A guy I work with has a real problem with women wearing sweatpants to the grocery store. I have no idea why but he has said on more than one occasion “ I hate women that wear sweats to the grocery store.” Does he really mean “ I hate women” ? It does if you stop reading or listening part ways through his statement.

Again I don’t agree with the statement Eric Church actually made or the more extreme statement yahoo is editing down and saying was his statement in the article. I do think if we are going to have the discussion we should at least be talking about what he actually said.

[JimmyHoffa]

Anyone who says that there should be a limit on the number and type of firearms that someone owns knows absolutely nothing about why the 2nd amendment exists. Terrorism is not an excuse to violate the rights of the citizen.

Should felons have guns?

If they've served their time and are no longer a threat when released, I think they should have all rights restored.  Part of the problem is so many that get released probably shouldn't have been.  The crazy people roaming the streets are the problem.  The normal citizens don't need more laws piled on them to accommodate having more paranoid schizophrenic people on experimental drugs.

[Timberstalker]

All I am saying is the is a difference between “nobody should have that many AR’s and ammo” and “nobody should have that many AR’ and ammo and we not know about it.”

I personally think the first statement is more extreme saying you can’t even have it. The second is not as extreme. The second statement is what he actually said, the first is what yahoo wants you to here. Do I agree with either? No. Do I think if you’re quoting someone you should not just pick the fragments that make the narrative you want portrayed? No.

A guy I work with has a real problem with women wearing sweatpants to the grocery store. I have no idea why but he has said on more than one occasion “ I hate women that wear sweats to the grocery store.” Does he really mean “ I hate women” ? It does if you stop reading or listening part ways through his statement.

Again I don’t agree with the statement Eric Church actually made or the more extreme statement yahoo is editing down and saying was his statement in the article. I do think if we are going to have the discussion we should at least be talking about what he actually said.

What about yoga pants?  He doesn’t hate those women does he?

[Special T]

All I am saying is the is a difference between “nobody should have that many AR’s and ammo” and “nobody should have that many AR’ and ammo and we not know about it.”

I personally think the first statement is more extreme saying you can’t even have it. The second is not as extreme. The second statement is what he actually said, the first is what yahoo wants you to here. Do I agree with either? No. Do I think if you’re quoting someone you should not just pick the fragments that make the narrative you want portrayed? No.

A guy I work with has a real problem with women wearing sweatpants to the grocery store. I have no idea why but he has said on more than one occasion “ I hate women that wear sweats to the grocery store.” Does he really mean “ I hate women” ? It does if you stop reading or listening part ways through his statement.

Again I don’t agree with the statement Eric Church actually made or the more extreme statement yahoo is editing down and saying was his statement in the article. I do think if we are going to have the discussion we should at least be talking about what he actually said.

What about yoga pants?  He doesn’t hate those women does he?

About 5% of women wearing yoga pants should be... and they bring a smile to everymans face... my mind has also been fixed with images of women whom should not be wearing them. The size XL and yoga pants shouldn't go together.... all of this applies to a lesser degree to sweats... ever seen a JUICY sweat pant on some one whom it doesn't belong?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

[Rainier10]

 
Sometimes it's like herding cats with you guys.

Thread derailed to "who likes cat's in yoga pants?" in 3,2,1.....

[Timberstalker]

Sometimes it's like herding cats with you guys.

Thread derailed to "who likes cat's in yoga pants?" in 3,2,1.....

Technically, you started the thread jack. 

[Dhoey07]

Anyone who says that there should be a limit on the number and type of firearms that someone owns knows absolutely nothing about why the 2nd amendment exists. Terrorism is not an excuse to violate the rights of the citizen.

Should felons have guns?

If they've served their time and are no longer a threat when released, I think they should have all rights restored.  Part of the problem is so many that get released probably shouldn't have been.  The crazy people roaming the streets are the problem.  The normal citizens don't need more laws piled on them to accommodate having more paranoid schizophrenic people on experimental drugs.

I agree,That is why felons can get their rights restored in certain circumstances.

So you agree that some people should have a limit on how many and what type of firearm they may own?

[Buzz2401]

Own two safes packed to the gills with firearms ranging from AR's to muzzleloaders I quit the NRA a long time ago. I think they are super crooked and I really don't like being told who I have to vote for.  I'm for reasonable gun control laws but have yet to ever see one come up for vote. 

[Special T]

Own two safes packed to the gills with firearms ranging from AR's to muzzleloaders I quit the NRA a long time ago. I think they are super crooked and I really don't like being told who I have to vote for.  I'm for reasonable gun control laws but have yet to ever see one come up for vote.

Which ones do you think are "reasonable"

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

[Igor]

Own two safes packed to the gills with firearms ranging from AR's to muzzleloaders I quit the NRA a long time ago. I think they are super crooked and I really don't like being told who I have to vote for.  I'm for reasonable gun control laws but have yet to ever see one come up for vote.

In my opinion, you can thank the NRA that you can own your guns, especially those evil ARs.  The NRA has fought many battles over the years, all over this country, in defense of your rights. 

I suggest you find a copy of I1639 and read it.  The NRA has already joined the battle to try to defeat it.

You love those evil semi-autos in your safe?  If you intend on buying another AR (or any other semi-automatic rifle) here is what I1639 will require:

(2) In addition to the other requirements of this chapter, no dealer may deliver a semiautomatic assault rifle to the purchaser thereof until:
(a) The purchaser provides proof that he or she has completed a recognized firearm safety training program within the last five years that, at a minimum, includes instruction on:
(i) Basic firearms safety rules;

(ii) Firearms and children, including secure gun storage and talking to children about gun safety;
(iii) Firearms and suicide prevention;

(iv) Secure gun storage to prevent unauthorized access and use;

(v) Safe handling of firearms; and

(vi) State and federal firearms laws, including prohibited firearms transfers.
The training must be sponsored by a federal, state, county, or municipal law enforcement agency, a college or university, a nationally recognized organization that customarily offers firearms training, or a firearms training school with instructors certified by a nationally recognized organization that customarily offers firearms training. The proof of training shall be in the form of a certification that states under the penalty of perjury the training included the minimum requirements

Oh yeah, and now every semi-automatic rifle is an "assault rifle under I1639.  Think about that one.........

[Special T]

Yup every semi auto used for whacking ducks and geese.  Good thing I've got all my guns bought... 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

[Calvin Rayborn]

I think he's gone a little off the deep end since his brother bit the dust. Looks like he's playing Sturgis Buffalo Chip this week. Man that gonna be a BRAWL!!!!!

[Stein]

Just saw him in Cheyenne, pretty good show but a bit low energy for my taste.

He didn’t mention one word political, just the way I like concerts.