collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Cougar Harvest Guideline System  (Read 8343 times)

Offline pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 44643
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • WWC, NRA Life, WFW, NAGR, RMEF, WSB, NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Cougar Harvest Guideline System
« on: July 31, 2018, 10:26:02 AM »
So, I'm looking at the cougar harvest guideline system. 560's guideline is 5-6. 572's guideline is 2-3. These are huge units. Based on maintaining populations using the standard of 14% +/- 2%, that means they estimate there are 40 cougars in all of the Lewis River unit and 18 in all of Siouxon? Am I reading the guidelines correctly and if so, are they smoking crack in Olympia while compiling these? Someone please tell me what I'm missing here, if anything.
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace

Offline Jonathan_S

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 8994
  • Location: Medical Lake
  • Volleyfire Brigade, Cryder apologist
Re: Cougar Harvest Guideline System
« Reply #1 on: July 31, 2018, 10:52:32 AM »
I don't think you're missing anything.  I'm no expert at cougar populations but I'd say it's crazy for anybody to estimate that low of a number in big wild areas with resident ungulates, particularly in those two units.
Kindly do not attempt to cloud the issue with too many facts.

Offline Ridgeratt

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 5883
  • IBEW 73 (Retired) Burden on the working class.
Re: Cougar Harvest Guideline System
« Reply #2 on: July 31, 2018, 11:10:22 AM »
You may get some input from KF Hunter if you ask him.

Offline KFhunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 34512
  • Location: NE Corner
Re: Cougar Harvest Guideline System
« Reply #3 on: July 31, 2018, 11:54:46 AM »
I don't have much to add other than it's political or emotionally based biology in which the ousted WSU professor Weilgus played a direct part. 

I can't believe that WDFW thinks their estimations are a real number.  Having that thought only makes me believe that WDFW is intentionally and deliberately misleading us all. 

Another thing that irks me about the low harvest guidelines is that problem cougar killed because they present a significant risk to the public or livestock are counted in the harvest guidelines, detracting from what hunters are allowed to take.

In the GMU's I'm most familiar with I know the numbers are very wrong. I spent time with the WSU student researchers that were running hounds and tracking the cats.  There are a lot more cats than WDFW lets on. 

The only question is why?

Offline wheels

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2012
  • Posts: 1458
  • Location: pacific washington
Re: Cougar Harvest Guideline System
« Reply #4 on: July 31, 2018, 03:01:52 PM »
maybe its time to call out wdfw

Offline Cougartail

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 3518
  • Location: Eastern Washington
Re: Cougar Harvest Guideline System
« Reply #5 on: July 31, 2018, 03:11:57 PM »
The only question is why?

Because the state is full of and lead by a bunch of *censored*.
« Last Edit: July 31, 2018, 03:15:00 PM by Rainier10 »
If I need a permit and education to buy a firearm than women should need a permit and education  before getting an abortion.

Voting for Democrats is prima facie evidence you are a skirt wearing, low T, beta male. Do better.

Offline Rainier10

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 15952
  • Location: Over the edge
Re: Cougar Harvest Guideline System
« Reply #6 on: July 31, 2018, 03:16:25 PM »
The forum has a built in censor, trying to get around it by changing letters or the spelling just makes more work for the mod team.

Please keep it clean.
Pain is temporary, achieving the goal is worth it.

I didn't say it would be easy, I said it would be worth it.

Every father should remember that one day his children will follow his example instead of his advice.


The views and opinions expressed in this post are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of HuntWa or the site owner.

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 25032
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: Cougar Harvest Guideline System
« Reply #7 on: July 31, 2018, 03:29:49 PM »
So, I'm looking at the cougar harvest guideline system. 560's guideline is 5-6. 572's guideline is 2-3. These are huge units. Based on maintaining populations using the standard of 14% +/- 2%, that means they estimate there are 40 cougars in all of the Lewis River unit and 18 in all of Siouxon? Am I reading the guidelines correctly and if so, are they smoking crack in Olympia while compiling these? Someone please tell me what I'm missing here, if anything.

As memory serves they only count adults 2+ years old as the population base... there was some kind of specific definition used that made the math merky for me.  :twocents:
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Offline pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 44643
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • WWC, NRA Life, WFW, NAGR, RMEF, WSB, NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: Cougar Harvest Guideline System
« Reply #8 on: July 31, 2018, 03:56:11 PM »
It still can't be even close to the real population.
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 25032
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: Cougar Harvest Guideline System
« Reply #9 on: July 31, 2018, 04:36:46 PM »
It still can't be even close to the real population.
It might also only be one sex...  I remeber it was something goofy about the definition.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Offline Cougartail

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 3518
  • Location: Eastern Washington
Re: Cougar Harvest Guideline System
« Reply #10 on: July 31, 2018, 04:49:46 PM »
It still can't be even close to the real population.

For years the population was estimated at 1900 to 2100. Then the state estimate was 3500 to 4500 a few years back. Magically it is now 1900 to 2100 again.

Odd?
If I need a permit and education to buy a firearm than women should need a permit and education  before getting an abortion.

Voting for Democrats is prima facie evidence you are a skirt wearing, low T, beta male. Do better.

Offline Moe the Sleaze

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 178
Re: Cougar Harvest Guideline System
« Reply #11 on: July 31, 2018, 05:14:48 PM »
I've never seen a cougar in 40 years of hunting elk and deer here, mostly in the NE corner.  How many do you folks think there are?  And how do you expect WDFW to conduct population surveys on Cougars?  Estimates at best, obviously.  So they decide to be conservative.  I have no problem with that.

Offline JimmyHoffa

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 14537
  • Location: 150 Years Too Late
Re: Cougar Harvest Guideline System
« Reply #12 on: July 31, 2018, 05:25:31 PM »
I see about 2-3 a year during deer and elk.  A couple of years ago I saw I think 7, but that also included fishing.

Offline Nwgunner

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Aug 2017
  • Posts: 118
  • Location: Pasco
  • Groups: RMEF Sportsmans Alliance
Re: Cougar Harvest Guideline System
« Reply #13 on: July 31, 2018, 06:48:07 PM »
Am I right in interpreting the regs to say that the harvest guideline system only refers to a possible closure during late season?  What happens if the guideline is reached during early season?

Offline hunter399

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 8655
  • Location: In Your Hunting Spot
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: Cougar Harvest Guideline System
« Reply #14 on: July 31, 2018, 07:55:46 PM »
Am I right in interpreting the regs to say that the harvest guideline system only refers to a possible closure during late season?  What happens if the guideline is reached during early season?
Nothing , they allow people to hunt till Jan 1 ,even if guidelines are done ,there are some cases that harvest is reached do to public safety cougar removals,so no late season.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal