collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Chemical Spraying  (Read 19745 times)

Offline Mudman

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2012
  • Posts: 7347
  • Location: Wetside rock garden.
  • Get R Done.
Re: Chemical Spraying
« Reply #105 on: February 15, 2019, 01:37:53 PM »
 :yike:  What!  Your kidding!  Government always said its totally safe!  So NY Cal and Wa all have science that agrees its bad??  41%?  Must be junk garbage fake news again.  Chemical manufactures have studies proof of its safety.  Hold on I have a weed growing by my well house.... :chuckle:
MAGA!  Again..

Offline Buckhunter24

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 2223
  • Location: Eatonville
Re: Chemical Spraying
« Reply #106 on: February 16, 2019, 06:57:05 PM »
Smoke approval windows are limited and are getting smaller every year.
What are the rules for both the private timber companies, and State land on slash burns etc?   

Everyone keeps bringing up that we need to go back to burning cuts, but I'm guessing they aren't allowed to at least no wholesale.     


Edit to add; Plus it would seem like the # of clear cuts that need to be burned (for a particular landowner) would stack up in the Summer months (burn bans etc), and that would mean that tons of landowners would be burning during hunting seasons.  Including DNR, which would mean I could come on here and read about them screwing over your hunting season.   
 
*used "your" to get the point across, not pointing at anyone in particular.

Offline Mudman

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2012
  • Posts: 7347
  • Location: Wetside rock garden.
  • Get R Done.
Re: Chemical Spraying
« Reply #107 on: February 16, 2019, 07:04:08 PM »
Like other things in the world if it isn't allowed but demand is there they will find/develop a new hopefully better product.  But it is allowed and makes a HUGE amount of $$ which funds study and political lobby instead of product research to replace poor products, imop.
MAGA!  Again..

Offline WildlifeAssassin

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 342
  • Groups: RMEF
Re: Chemical Spraying
« Reply #108 on: April 23, 2019, 06:57:11 PM »
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-42860-0

Abstract:
Ancestral environmental exposures to a variety of factors and toxicants have been shown to promote the epigenetic transgenerational inheritance of adult onset disease. One of the most widely used agricultural pesticides worldwide is the herbicide glyphosate (N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine), commonly known as Roundup. There are an increasing number of conflicting reports regarding the direct exposure toxicity (risk) of glyphosate, but no rigorous investigations on the generational actions. The current study using a transient exposure of gestating F0 generation female rats found negligible impacts of glyphosate on the directly exposed F0 generation, or F1 generation offspring pathology. In contrast, dramatic increases in pathologies in the F2 generation grand-offspring, and F3 transgenerational great-grand-offspring were observed. The transgenerational pathologies observed include prostate disease, obesity, kidney disease, ovarian disease, and parturition (birth) abnormalities. Epigenetic analysis of the F1, F2 and F3 generation sperm identified differential DNA methylation regions (DMRs). A number of DMR associated genes were identified and previously shown to be involved in pathologies. Therefore, we propose glyphosate can induce the transgenerational inheritance of disease and germline (e.g. sperm) epimutations. Observations suggest the generational toxicology of glyphosate needs to be considered in the disease etiology of future generations.

Offline Gobble Doc

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2010
  • Posts: 2680
  • Location: Snohomish, WA
Re: Chemical Spraying
« Reply #109 on: April 23, 2019, 08:21:37 PM »
Chemicals are bad. Adenosine triphosphate. Oh wait, it’s in every cell and our main energy source. 


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline WildlifeAssassin

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 342
  • Groups: RMEF
Re: Chemical Spraying
« Reply #110 on: April 24, 2019, 06:38:14 AM »
New survey in humans shows link between advanced liver disease and glyphosate

https://www.gmwatch.org/en/news/latest-news/18897

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Dehydrating Chantrelles by MR5x5
[Today at 03:46:57 PM]


Idaho on the verge of outlawing by kodiak06
[Today at 03:44:14 PM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by Berin Denson
[Today at 03:30:05 PM]


2025 elk success thread!! by redi
[Today at 02:37:23 PM]


Displaced Hunting Camps? by elkaholic123
[Today at 01:34:10 PM]


Blue Tongue and EHD outbreak in NE Washington by Shooter4
[Today at 01:23:15 PM]


Quality tag by Kingofthemountain83
[Today at 12:02:57 PM]


2025 opener by EnglishSetter
[Today at 11:57:00 AM]


Talking About Barely Legal by lewy
[Today at 10:00:55 AM]


Douglas 108 Moose tag by TriggerMike
[Yesterday at 09:06:30 PM]


GROUSE 2025...the Season is looming! by lovetogrouse
[Yesterday at 07:42:22 PM]


Japanese Kei truck? by Caseyd
[Yesterday at 06:06:01 PM]


CCW/SA small Supreme Court win+breaking down the WWF "Not my WDFW" Campaign by Firstgenhunter
[Yesterday at 05:42:36 PM]


3 pintails by metlhead
[Yesterday at 05:30:31 PM]


Nile bull hunters by lee
[Yesterday at 04:31:32 PM]


Boring & relining .22 barrel, any recommendations? by dreadi
[Yesterday at 03:07:26 PM]


Bear Snare? by danderson
[Yesterday at 01:42:34 PM]


Panhandle whitetail dates by TeacherMan
[Yesterday at 12:51:25 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal