Free: Contests & Raffles.
Total Members Voted: 171
Is it not first added to the gross and then deducted for the net. So a 150 typ with a 10" dropper would gross 160 but have a deduct of 10" for a 150 net, like it never existed. I think
I voted for trash. Makes me think of @BULLBLASTER and the buck he shot this year. A freak nasty buck whose typical counterpart (score wise) would be passable but not when he had so much cool stuff going on above the ears.
I used to have an obsessions with big typicals because of their rarity (never killed one). Trashy bucks have grown on me over time and mass has really grown on me. Maybe because I have had zero success with the big typicals?When I’m in the field, I’m always looking at gross score. Gross score is a pretty good representation of “how big” a buck is. I’m still not a fan of the 170” buck with a bunch of trash; for me, with a good tag in my pocket, I want a buck with at least a 180” frame. I’m still a sucker for giant 3’s and 3x4’s though. I’d love to shoot a 35” 3 point someday.
Quote from: jjhunter on December 17, 2018, 11:41:56 AMI used to have an obsessions with big typicals because of their rarity (never killed one). Trashy bucks have grown on me over time and mass has really grown on me. Maybe because I have had zero success with the big typicals?When I’m in the field, I’m always looking at gross score. Gross score is a pretty good representation of “how big” a buck is. I’m still not a fan of the 170” buck with a bunch of trash; for me, with a good tag in my pocket, I want a buck with at least a 180” frame. I’m still a sucker for giant 3’s and 3x4’s though. I’d love to shoot a 35” 3 point someday.I hope one day I can get to the point of not being a fan of the 170 trashy buck. My “big” buck scale starts a bit lower than some guys. I am a big fan of big back fork 3 points tho.