Free: Contests & Raffles.
I am a ttsx fan.
I was going to recommend accubonds until I read the end of your post. Honestly I don't know if I would expect a pass through on a moose. I didn't get one with 200 grain accubonds out of my .300 WM last year.Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Quote from: grundy53 on February 28, 2019, 04:01:16 PMI was going to recommend accubonds until I read the end of your post. Honestly I don't know if I would expect a pass through on a moose. I didn't get one with 200 grain accubonds out of my .300 WM last year.Sent from my SM-G950U using TapatalkNot sure I expect a pass through, but was surprised I didn't get it. They are huge animals with lots of mass and lots of muscle. Maybe I am over thinking this a bit.....one of my weakness, if you will, is always looking for the best. Often I find myself chasing my tail....LOL The moose never took a step so what I used obviously worked.
Quote from: Woodchuck on February 28, 2019, 03:51:25 PMI am a ttsx fan. I was looking at them for the solid copper option, but their heaviest is only 180 grain. Wish they made a 200+ grain for .308 diam. Unless I am looking at it wrong??
Though, I have no experience on game, my 300wm likes the 199gr Sledge hammers in front of h1000 traveling at 3015 and I would imagine would do damage to a moose.[/quoteDo you like the way they shoot?? May have to try them. I was looking at their 214's.
Though, I have no experience on game, my 300wm likes the 199gr Sledge hammers in front of h1000 traveling at 3015 and I would imagine would do damage to a moose.
Sounds like a good excuse for a new rifle.
Quote from: Curly on February 28, 2019, 10:02:50 PMSounds like a good excuse for a new rifle. No....that's what this one is for. I have a 45/70 and 450 Marlin that would get the job done too.....but range is limited. This is just another reason to work a load with the same rifle. Ordered 150 bucks worth of hammers in 214 gr and 227 gr to see what they do. Hopefully I draw a bear tag In The spring to try them out. If not I will have to get a fall bear before the hunt.
Conventional wisdom is that “heavy for caliber” bullets penetrate better. I believe that may always be true to an extent, but I suspect much of that thinking came from a time when bullets shed a lot of weight. A 180 grain bullet that sheds 40% of its weight only has 108 grains of weight left.I’ve had excellent results using 165 grain Barnes bullets in .30 caliber on elk/moose size animals. I’ve only recovered a couple of them; most were pass-throughs and are still circling the planet in orbit. 165 grains going in, 165 grains going out.
I believe I've heard @bearpaw tell stories of multiple moose kills with a .257 Roy....
Quote from: 92xj on February 28, 2019, 04:31:13 PMThough, I have no experience on game, my 300wm likes the 199gr Sledge hammers in front of h1000 traveling at 3015 and I would imagine would do damage to a moose.That was going to be my suggestion for a solid copper bullet. I'm a huge fan of all the Hammer bullets just because of how well they shoot. What's the max OAL you can use and what's your barrel twist? Their 181gr Hammer Hunter is the same length as a 200gr Accubond though so they're really long bullets which can be an issue in some guns. That's why the 199gr Sledge Hammer might be better since they've got a much shorter nose profile. They have a lower BC, but it's not enough that I'd worry about it inside of 600 yards. I've shot the 275gr Sledge Hammers to 600 yards out of my 375 Ruger with a muzzle velocity of around 2675 fps with great results. For lead core bullets I usually go for the Accubonds, but if they're not working for you maybe the Swift Scirocco is worth looking at. I think 180 is the heaviest they offer in that though.