collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: 2017 spring bear harvest results  (Read 5033 times)

Offline BULLBLASTER

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 8099
Re: 2017 spring bear harvest results
« Reply #15 on: April 01, 2019, 01:13:56 PM »
You guys are giving wdfw way too much credit.......Sitting way over there, your guesses and other comments are so far off base its funny.....you have not a clue whats going on over here.  Thinking theyre doing the right thing over here or waiting for them to do it is a lost cause, we need aggressive predator control now, as in more predators removed from the mix, and that can only be cats and bears since the wolves are still safe, and have pushed the balance of nature past the tipping point.  If you guys are unwilling to listen to guys that live here in these woods,  so be it, but dont try and tell us we are wrong or stupid, because we arent.  You guys just arent here enough or at all to see for yourselves.
I’m not sure who in this thread has given wdfw too much credit. Or who you are referring to saying “way over there” if it’s me you are so far off base it isn’t funny. I live in Spokane and hunt the NE every year.
If it’s not me then carry on.  :chuckle:
« Last Edit: April 01, 2019, 01:44:04 PM by BULLBLASTER »

Offline Bango skank

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2014
  • Posts: 5876
  • Location: colville
Re: 2017 spring bear harvest results
« Reply #16 on: April 01, 2019, 02:01:51 PM »
You guys are giving wdfw way too much credit.......Sitting way over there, your guesses and other comments are so far off base its funny.....you have not a clue whats going on over here.  Thinking theyre doing the right thing over here or waiting for them to do it is a lost cause, we need aggressive predator control now, as in more predators removed from the mix, and that can only be cats and bears since the wolves are still safe, and have pushed the balance of nature past the tipping point.  If you guys are unwilling to listen to guys that live here in these woods,  so be it, but dont try and tell us we are wrong or stupid, because we arent.  You guys just arent here enough or at all to see for yourselves.
I’m not sure who in this thread has given wdfw too much credit. Or who you are referring to saying “way over there” if it’s me you are so far off base it isn’t funny. I live in Spokane and hunt the NE every year.
If it’s not me then carry on.  :chuckle:

Everybody who claims wdfw is keeping bear harvest at an appropriate level is giving wdfw too much credit

Offline Stein

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 13095
  • Location: Arlington
Re: 2017 spring bear harvest results
« Reply #17 on: April 01, 2019, 03:16:08 PM »
I think we are saying they are keeping it at some level they decided was appropriate.  I didn't defend or refute that level, just saying the tag numbers are adjusted up or down to manage to that level.  If the harvest percentages jump, I would expect the number of tags issued to drop and vice versa.  Thus, it would only impact a few bears in one year, not a bunch every year.

The place where hunters can make a difference is the general tag. 

Offline JakeLand

  • WA State Trappers Association
  • Trade Count: (+35)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 4550
  • Location: Wet side
Re: 2017 spring bear harvest results
« Reply #18 on: April 01, 2019, 03:41:06 PM »
Timing s everything
From my perspective they open the spring tag a month too early there’s too much snow and not enough green. The last week of the spring season is marginal at best on a good year on a year like this it’s going to be a tough one. The Monroe tag was decent but wait they took that tag out of the draw

Offline jackelope

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+29)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50670
  • Location: Duvall, WA
  • Groups: jackelope
Re: 2017 spring bear harvest results
« Reply #19 on: April 01, 2019, 04:11:38 PM »
You guys are giving wdfw way too much credit.......Sitting way over there, your guesses and other comments are so far off base its funny.....you have not a clue whats going on over here.  Thinking theyre doing the right thing over here or waiting for them to do it is a lost cause, we need aggressive predator control now, as in more predators removed from the mix, and that can only be cats and bears since the wolves are still safe, and have pushed the balance of nature past the tipping point.  If you guys are unwilling to listen to guys that live here in these woods,  so be it, but dont try and tell us we are wrong or stupid, because we arent.  You guys just arent here enough or at all to see for yourselves.
I’m not sure who in this thread has given wdfw too much credit. Or who you are referring to saying “way over there” if it’s me you are so far off base it isn’t funny. I live in Spokane and hunt the NE every year.
If it’s not me then carry on.  :chuckle:

His "way over there" I was guessing was referring to us wetsiders. We barely know how to get to NE WA, nevermind hunt there.

"Hate speech does not exist legally in America. There's ugly speech. There's gross speech. There's evil speech. And ALL of it is protected by the First Amendment."

Online hunter399

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 9012
  • Location: In Your Hunting Spot
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: 2017 spring bear harvest results
« Reply #20 on: April 01, 2019, 08:47:13 PM »
Looks like this topic going down the poop hole. :chuckle:
Anyway some areas are way overpopulated ,while some areas are maybe close to decent population.Part of the problem is bear numbers are just a estimated.

Estimated 20k-25k bears in Washington maybe more

Here's a like to statewide harvest total for 2017

https://wdfw.wa.gov/hunting/management/game-harvest/2017/black-bear-statewide

Offline Pac_NW

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Tracker
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2017
  • Posts: 28
  • Location: Bellingham, WA
Re: 2017 spring bear harvest results
« Reply #21 on: April 02, 2019, 09:41:12 AM »
Looks like this topic going down the poop hole. :chuckle:
Anyway some areas are way overpopulated ,while some areas are maybe close to decent population.Part of the problem is bear numbers are just a estimated.

Estimated 20k-25k bears in Washington maybe more

Here's a like to statewide harvest total for 2017

https://wdfw.wa.gov/hunting/management/game-harvest/2017/black-bear-statewide

This is spot on, the publishes biologists reports either say, yes there are bears here, but we dont count them, or no bears in the area.

Imo it's hard to establish a quota or harvest goal if they dont have reliable data.

Offline KFhunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 34471
  • Location: NE Corner
Re: 2017 spring bear harvest results
« Reply #22 on: April 02, 2019, 09:52:07 AM »
get those poop sniffing dogs they used for wolf scat   :dunno:


or how about just take our word for it, there's too many bear eating too many fawns and calves!

Offline Limhangerslayer

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 1663
  • Location: Dryside
Re: 2017 spring bear harvest results
« Reply #23 on: April 02, 2019, 11:20:28 AM »
I had the Dayton tag in 17.  I hunted 15 days on that tag, only saw two other bear hunters.  And one of then was my buddy that drew with me.  They could issue more tags for sure.  And open more units

Offline pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 45502
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • Mortgage Licenses in WA, ID, & OR NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: 2017 spring bear harvest results
« Reply #24 on: April 02, 2019, 11:27:13 AM »
I'd like to see some units opened for spring bear down hear in the SW. Plenty of bears over here and plenty of public land. I believe the problem is the number of permits allowed for private landowners/timber companies skews the numbers.
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace https://valoaneducator.tv/johnwallace-2014743

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

public land blacktail traditional archer by addicted1
[Today at 08:55:20 AM]


Late season in gods Country My big buck by C-Money
[Today at 08:09:29 AM]


Idaho Non-Res draw results by thom9719
[Today at 08:05:44 AM]


Washington Wild Sheep Foundation Banquet by KNOPHISH
[Today at 08:05:40 AM]


Idaho on the verge of outlawing by bearpaw
[Today at 07:41:36 AM]


Charcuterie by Stein
[Today at 07:29:20 AM]


CWD in ferry county by Longfield1
[Today at 06:12:52 AM]


Prince of Wales Spring Bear 2026 by trophyhunt
[Today at 06:00:29 AM]


Know Where To Hunt Club by JJJ
[Yesterday at 10:57:22 PM]


Special vs. Regular Pronghorn in WY by Bob33
[Yesterday at 09:48:50 PM]


Idaho Trapping Journal 2025/26 by TeacherMan
[Yesterday at 08:54:27 PM]


Dodge trucks by b23
[Yesterday at 08:13:53 PM]


Idaho deer 2026. Let’s go!! by TeacherMan
[Yesterday at 07:36:50 PM]


Idaho's new Deer/Elk License System by andrew_in_idaho
[Yesterday at 04:38:36 PM]


Duck Hunting Land Trust by knob221
[Yesterday at 03:06:36 PM]


Tikka 7prc by HereDuckyDucky
[Yesterday at 02:48:34 PM]


Swap Saltwater fishing for private ground hunting by washingtonmuley
[Yesterday at 02:40:14 PM]


Define Wide by b23
[Yesterday at 01:18:24 PM]


Cowiche Quality Buck by Face72
[Yesterday at 12:25:28 PM]


EuroOptic by Webfoot
[Yesterday at 11:20:32 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal