collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Conflict Goat draw?  (Read 12054 times)

Online Stein

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 13139
  • Location: Arlington
Re: Conflict Goat draw?
« Reply #15 on: April 24, 2019, 08:54:29 AM »
WDFW certainly has a bend towards changing this back to how we believe they were at some random, undefined, time in the past.  The same thing is happening with fish.  A big push is coming from the environmental groups and there is no reason to believe it won't continue to march on, if not increasing in speed.

Offline jackelope

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+29)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50680
  • Location: Duvall, WA
  • Groups: jackelope
Re: Conflict Goat draw?
« Reply #16 on: April 24, 2019, 09:34:15 AM »
WDFW certainly has a bend towards changing this back to how we believe they were at some random, undefined, time in the past.  The same thing is happening with fish.  A big push is coming from the environmental groups and there is no reason to believe it won't continue to march on, if not increasing in speed.

I might be wrong, but I think the goat move was a National Park project with help from the WDFW. 
"Hate speech does not exist legally in America. There's ugly speech. There's gross speech. There's evil speech. And ALL of it is protected by the First Amendment."

Online Stein

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 13139
  • Location: Arlington
Re: Conflict Goat draw?
« Reply #17 on: April 24, 2019, 09:54:20 AM »
WDFW certainly has a bend towards changing this back to how we believe they were at some random, undefined, time in the past.  The same thing is happening with fish.  A big push is coming from the environmental groups and there is no reason to believe it won't continue to march on, if not increasing in speed.

I might be wrong, but I think the goat move was a National Park project with help from the WDFW.

Yeah, I was commenting in general. 

In this instance, WDFW willingly spent money doing something that resulted in permanently less hunting opportunity.  Nobody forced them to act at all, or act in this manner when other options were available.  It's the way the department acts, when given an opportunity or asked to do something, they rarely, if ever, seriously consider sportsmen.

Look at the other states, they are constantly suing to defend or improve hunting opportunities.  They are fighting for the sportsmen.  I don't see the same attitude with WDFW.  I'm not really concerned with this happening in a bunch of other western states because their game agencies have a completely different attitude.

Offline jackelope

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+29)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50680
  • Location: Duvall, WA
  • Groups: jackelope
Re: Conflict Goat draw?
« Reply #18 on: April 24, 2019, 09:59:49 AM »
WDFW certainly has a bend towards changing this back to how we believe they were at some random, undefined, time in the past.  The same thing is happening with fish.  A big push is coming from the environmental groups and there is no reason to believe it won't continue to march on, if not increasing in speed.

I might be wrong, but I think the goat move was a National Park project with help from the WDFW.

Yeah, I was commenting in general. 

In this instance, WDFW willingly spent money doing something that resulted in permanently less hunting opportunity.  Nobody forced them to act at all, or act in this manner when other options were available.  It's the way the department acts, when given an opportunity or asked to do something, they rarely, if ever, seriously consider sportsmen.

Look at the other states, they are constantly suing to defend or improve hunting opportunities.  They are fighting for the sportsmen.  I don't see the same attitude with WDFW.  I'm not really concerned with this happening in a bunch of other western states because their game agencies have a completely different attitude.

I'm definitely not trying to argue when I say this, because I don't fully agree with the decision to move the goats...but it's been said multiple times...the goats were moved to supplement other herds where there are currently no hunting opportunitites with hopes that some increased hunting opportunities arise in the future.
@Bushcraft  can possibly/hopefully clarify with some more legit info in this regard. The Rocky Mountain Goat Alliance is also heavily involved in this project.

https://goatalliance.org/blogs/news/olympic-national-park-goat-removal-to-begin-september-2018

Quote

Olympic National Park Goat Removal to Begin September 2018.


Jun 30, 2018 · Lyle Hebel
 

 



The largest mountain goat relocation project in American history is set to begin this September in Olympic National Park. The National Park Service (NPS) has decided to completely eradicate the species from the landscape over the next three years.

Mountain goats were introduced to the Olympic Mountains in the late 1920’s and the park service arrived in 1938. In what the park is calling an attempt to preserve native alpine plants, all of Olympic Nation Park’s (ONP) mountain goats will either be live-captured or lethally-removed over the next several years.

This fall’s initial capture will be a trial run to the massive endeavors to come in 2019 and 2020. The park estimates their goat population around 650 animals. The goal is to live-capture as many animals as possible and to gift them to the state of Washington.

The live-captured animals will be used to augment and revitalize native goat habitat in Washington’s north Cascades. A live capture of this many mountain goats has never been attempted. Several agencies and organizations are working together to execute this unprecedented project.

RMGA conservation dollars have been allocated to the purchasing of several collars to be used by Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife to track and study the relocated animals. The restoration of Washington’s native goat habitat is a conservation success the RMGA is proud to be part of.

After the live-capture phase is deemed complete, the remaining mountain goats will be lethally removed. The current proposal is for the first wave of lethal removal to be executed by vetted backcountry volunteers. Hired government marksmen will carry out the final phase of mountain goat removal. Stay tuned for more ONP mountain goat removal project updates.

 

 

 
"Hate speech does not exist legally in America. There's ugly speech. There's gross speech. There's evil speech. And ALL of it is protected by the First Amendment."

Offline X-Force

  • Solo Hunter
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 5580
Re: Conflict Goat draw?
« Reply #19 on: April 24, 2019, 10:03:13 AM »
It surprises me more people aren't concerned about the precedence this sets, removing animals because they are non native. There are a lot of huntable populations that are introduced, the entire state of Colorado for example for goats. Why won't they be next? I live at the base of the olympics, its goat country 100%. I cannot imagine we won't be seeing more of this in the future and its sad because as hunters we are losing opportunities left and right, here's another one lost forever

The National Park Service is trying to return park land to native plants and animals across the US. Eliminating or removing goats outside of the ONP is necessary to keep those populations from repopulating the park.

The Olympics may be goat country but there is no evidence that they ever existed there until the early 1900's when they were introduced.

I don't know of a national park in the lower 48 that allows nonnative hunting so your fears are not valid.

One thing to remember about the ONP relocation and removal is that if the relocation happened park to park ONP to Rainier or ONP to NCNP there would have been zero public input and the park service would have completed the relocation and extirpation without WDFW or NFS. As it is the habitat in the NCNP is not conducive to goats so public input was required for this multiple entity venture.
People get offended at nothing at all. So, speak your mind and be unapologetic.

Offline jackelope

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+29)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50680
  • Location: Duvall, WA
  • Groups: jackelope
Re: Conflict Goat draw?
« Reply #20 on: April 24, 2019, 10:09:26 AM »
It surprises me more people aren't concerned about the precedence this sets, removing animals because they are non native. There are a lot of huntable populations that are introduced, the entire state of Colorado for example for goats. Why won't they be next? I live at the base of the olympics, its goat country 100%. I cannot imagine we won't be seeing more of this in the future and its sad because as hunters we are losing opportunities left and right, here's another one lost forever

The National Park Service is trying to return park land to native plants and animals across the US. Eliminating or removing goats outside of the ONP is necessary to keep those populations from repopulating the park.

The Olympics may be goat country but there is no evidence that they ever existed there until the early 1900's when they were introduced.

I don't know of a national park in the lower 48 that allows nonnative hunting so your fears are not valid.

One thing to remember about the ONP relocation and removal is that if the relocation happened park to park ONP to Rainier or ONP to NCNP there would have been zero public input and the park service would have completed the relocation and extirpation without WDFW or NFS. As it is the habitat in the NCNP is not conducive to goats so public input was required for this multiple entity venture.

Was just about to come back to this.  WDFW spent money and got more goats on land that can be hunted in the future. The park service could have called in some sharpshooters from the dept of ag to shoot goats and eliminate them all or move them to MRNP where they couldn't be hunted, but instead we got some for, hopefully, additional hunter opportunity in the future.
"Hate speech does not exist legally in America. There's ugly speech. There's gross speech. There's evil speech. And ALL of it is protected by the First Amendment."

Online Stein

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 13139
  • Location: Arlington
Re: Conflict Goat draw?
« Reply #21 on: April 24, 2019, 11:22:45 AM »
It surprises me more people aren't concerned about the precedence this sets, removing animals because they are non native. There are a lot of huntable populations that are introduced, the entire state of Colorado for example for goats. Why won't they be next? I live at the base of the olympics, its goat country 100%. I cannot imagine we won't be seeing more of this in the future and its sad because as hunters we are losing opportunities left and right, here's another one lost forever

The National Park Service is trying to return park land to native plants and animals across the US. Eliminating or removing goats outside of the ONP is necessary to keep those populations from repopulating the park.

The Olympics may be goat country but there is no evidence that they ever existed there until the early 1900's when they were introduced.

I don't know of a national park in the lower 48 that allows nonnative hunting so your fears are not valid.

One thing to remember about the ONP relocation and removal is that if the relocation happened park to park ONP to Rainier or ONP to NCNP there would have been zero public input and the park service would have completed the relocation and extirpation without WDFW or NFS. As it is the habitat in the NCNP is not conducive to goats so public input was required for this multiple entity venture.

Was just about to come back to this.  WDFW spent money and got more goats on land that can be hunted in the future. The park service could have called in some sharpshooters from the dept of ag to shoot goats and eliminate them all or move them to MRNP where they couldn't be hunted, but instead we got some for, hopefully, additional hunter opportunity in the future.

That's a good point, when viewed that way I take back my jab at WDFW, but just for this one instance.   :chuckle:

Offline Shaqdiesel

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: May 2014
  • Posts: 112
  • Location: Bonney Lake
Re: Conflict Goat draw?
« Reply #22 on: April 24, 2019, 11:39:05 AM »
So what’s gonna happen to my points now?  :dunno:
60% of the time, it works every time.

Offline sagerat

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 672
  • Location: Blacktail Country
Re: Conflict Goat draw?
« Reply #23 on: April 24, 2019, 12:57:52 PM »
It surprises me more people aren't concerned about the precedence this sets, removing animals because they are non native. There are a lot of huntable populations that are introduced, the entire state of Colorado for example for goats. Why won't they be next? I live at the base of the olympics, its goat country 100%. I cannot imagine we won't be seeing more of this in the future and its sad because as hunters we are losing opportunities left and right, here's another one lost forever

The National Park Service is trying to return park land to native plants and animals across the US. Eliminating or removing goats outside of the ONP is necessary to keep those populations from repopulating the park.

The Olympics may be goat country but there is no evidence that they ever existed there until the early 1900's when they were introduced.

I don't know of a national park in the lower 48 that allows nonnative hunting so your fears are not valid.

One thing to remember about the ONP relocation and removal is that if the relocation happened park to park ONP to Rainier or ONP to NCNP there would have been zero public input and the park service would have completed the relocation and extirpation without WDFW or NFS. As it is the habitat in the NCNP is not conducive to goats so public input was required for this multiple entity venture.

Why is the habitat in NCNP not suitable for goats?

Offline sagerat

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 672
  • Location: Blacktail Country
Re: Conflict Goat draw?
« Reply #24 on: April 24, 2019, 12:59:11 PM »
So what’s gonna happen to my points now?  :dunno:

I was wondering the same thing, prepare to be disappointed

Offline Katmai Guy

  • Retired
  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2014
  • Posts: 1590
  • Location: Covington
Re: Conflict Goat draw?
« Reply #25 on: April 24, 2019, 01:02:29 PM »
It surprises me more people aren't concerned about the precedence this sets, removing animals because they are non native. There are a lot of huntable populations that are introduced, the entire state of Colorado for example for goats. Why won't they be next? I live at the base of the olympics, its goat country 100%. I cannot imagine we won't be seeing more of this in the future and its sad because as hunters we are losing opportunities left and right, here's another one lost forever

The National Park Service is trying to return park land to native plants and animals across the US. Eliminating or removing goats outside of the ONP is necessary to keep those populations from repopulating the park.

The Olympics may be goat country but there is no evidence that they ever existed there until the early 1900's when they were introduced.

I don't know of a national park in the lower 48 that allows nonnative hunting so your fears are not valid.

One thing to remember about the ONP relocation and removal is that if the relocation happened park to park ONP to Rainier or ONP to NCNP there would have been zero public input and the park service would have completed the relocation and extirpation without WDFW or NFS. As it is the habitat in the NCNP is not conducive to goats so public input was required for this multiple entity venture.

Why is the habitat in NCNP not suitable for goats?

Its not that the habitat is not suitable, it's that the goats are eating some endangered flower that only grows in the park and destroying the landscape digging for minerals I guess.
Its not that the habitat is not suitable, it's that the goats are eating some endangered flower that only grows in the park and destroying the landscape digging for minerals I guess.
"Keep shootin, when there's lead in the air, there's hope"

Online Stein

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 13139
  • Location: Arlington
Re: Conflict Goat draw?
« Reply #26 on: April 24, 2019, 01:02:32 PM »
So what’s gonna happen to my points now?  :dunno:

I was wondering the same thing, prepare to be disappointed

Thanks for your business.   :chuckle:

I think I have points as well, I don't remember applying but think I used to buy everything they had available.

Offline jackelope

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+29)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50680
  • Location: Duvall, WA
  • Groups: jackelope
Re: Conflict Goat draw?
« Reply #27 on: April 24, 2019, 01:17:17 PM »
So what’s gonna happen to my points now?  :dunno:

It was a herd reduction hunt. Pretty much a cull hunt. Once the herd is culled...you don't need points anymore
:dunno:
"Hate speech does not exist legally in America. There's ugly speech. There's gross speech. There's evil speech. And ALL of it is protected by the First Amendment."

Offline Tbar

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+26)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 3066
  • Location: Whatcom county
Re: Conflict Goat draw?
« Reply #28 on: April 24, 2019, 01:47:05 PM »
So what’s gonna happen to my points now?  :dunno:

It was a herd reduction hunt. Pretty much a cull hunt. Once the herd is culled...you don't need points anymore
:dunno:
There is a possibility that there will be an opportunity post move but that's all undecided.  It's an option on the table though.

Offline sagerat

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 672
  • Location: Blacktail Country
Re: Conflict Goat draw?
« Reply #29 on: April 24, 2019, 02:28:08 PM »
It surprises me more people aren't concerned about the precedence this sets, removing animals because they are non native. There are a lot of huntable populations that are introduced, the entire state of Colorado for example for goats. Why won't they be next? I live at the base of the olympics, its goat country 100%. I cannot imagine we won't be seeing more of this in the future and its sad because as hunters we are losing opportunities left and right, here's another one lost forever

The National Park Service is trying to return park land to native plants and animals across the US. Eliminating or removing goats outside of the ONP is necessary to keep those populations from repopulating the park.

The Olympics may be goat country but there is no evidence that they ever existed there until the early 1900's when they were introduced.

I don't know of a national park in the lower 48 that allows nonnative hunting so your fears are not valid.

One thing to remember about the ONP relocation and removal is that if the relocation happened park to park ONP to Rainier or ONP to NCNP there would have been zero public input and the park service would have completed the relocation and extirpation without WDFW or NFS. As it is the habitat in the NCNP is not conducive to goats so public input was required for this multiple entity venture.

Why is the habitat in NCNP not suitable for goats?

Its not that the habitat is not suitable, it's that the goats are eating some endangered flower that only grows in the park and destroying the landscape digging for minerals I guess.
Its not that the habitat is not suitable, it's that the goats are eating some endangered flower that only grows in the park and destroying the landscape digging for minerals I guess.

That’s for ONP I believe. Goats are Native in the North Cascades. Just wondering what the thoughts are about NCNP not being suitable.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Idaho on the verge of outlawing by trophyhunt
[Today at 12:25:08 PM]


Hunting with a suppressor - dumb idea? by birdshooter1189
[Today at 12:15:11 PM]


Bearpaw Season 2025 by Machias
[Today at 11:56:18 AM]


Aladdin unit 111 mule deer quality tag by Ridgerunner
[Today at 11:41:42 AM]


Sheep Ewe - Whitestone Sheep Unit 20 by hunterednate
[Today at 10:37:28 AM]


Boring & relining .22 barrel, any recommendations? by Blacktail Sniper
[Today at 10:12:06 AM]


Roadless Rule Public Comment by timberfaller
[Today at 09:54:50 AM]


Smoked salmon by CaNINE
[Today at 09:51:34 AM]


Blue Tongue and EHD outbreak in NE Washington by NWBREW
[Today at 09:28:16 AM]


Sitka Beanie's and WS Jetstream gloves on sale by TheYoungSelfStarter
[Today at 09:16:07 AM]


Westside Muzzy Elk Habitat Help and Rut Help by JakeLand
[Today at 08:13:15 AM]


Reproduction for a Euro Mount in Wa??? by Docspud
[Today at 07:02:35 AM]


Early Huckleberry Bull Moose tag drawn! by jrebel
[Yesterday at 11:04:40 PM]


Looking for a mentor by addicted1
[Yesterday at 10:58:58 PM]


49 DN Moose Success by avidnwoutdoorsman
[Yesterday at 08:24:07 PM]


2025 Canning by b0bbyg
[Yesterday at 07:41:08 PM]


Any OBS/IDI Ford Guys here? by Smokeploe
[Yesterday at 04:18:56 PM]


Big Timber Whitetail Food? by elkboy
[Yesterday at 02:56:11 PM]


Methow Wildlife Area Shooting Range by h2ofowlr
[Yesterday at 02:14:24 PM]


Moose's 2025 Upland Season by bighorns2bushytails
[Yesterday at 01:37:20 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal