Free: Contests & Raffles.
Quote from: idahohuntr on August 14, 2019, 09:00:46 AMQuote from: ballpark on August 14, 2019, 08:40:05 AMQuote from: idahohuntr on August 13, 2019, 12:57:08 PMThe commission approved the agency proposed legislation requesting fee increases. It now goes to the legislature for approval...can't imagine they will not pass this. Who thinks an increase from $93 to $553 for Non-resident Junior/DAV deer and elk tag/license is a good idea Yes it was a great deal while it lasted.I think you answered your own question...it was so far below market price that it would be almost negligent for them not to raise prices. if profiting off of children is the goal then yes you are correct. But once again I'll argue that in the long run you alienate future customers and further hurt the heritage of hunting. Our numbers are dwindling at an alarming rate but our fish and game agencies just keep doubling down. But hey screw those NR hunters who fund 90% of our game agencies that allow us residents low tag costs, and those NR that dump MILLIONS into our local economies
Quote from: ballpark on August 14, 2019, 08:40:05 AMQuote from: idahohuntr on August 13, 2019, 12:57:08 PMThe commission approved the agency proposed legislation requesting fee increases. It now goes to the legislature for approval...can't imagine they will not pass this. Who thinks an increase from $93 to $553 for Non-resident Junior/DAV deer and elk tag/license is a good idea Yes it was a great deal while it lasted.I think you answered your own question...it was so far below market price that it would be almost negligent for them not to raise prices.
Quote from: idahohuntr on August 13, 2019, 12:57:08 PMThe commission approved the agency proposed legislation requesting fee increases. It now goes to the legislature for approval...can't imagine they will not pass this. Who thinks an increase from $93 to $553 for Non-resident Junior/DAV deer and elk tag/license is a good idea Yes it was a great deal while it lasted.
The commission approved the agency proposed legislation requesting fee increases. It now goes to the legislature for approval...can't imagine they will not pass this.
Every state sticks it to the NR hunters and fishermen, it's hard to argue against that. They pay a big multiple of residents across the board for virtually everything.If we are only talking about youth hunter recruitment, then doubling the prices will hurt that. It certainly isn't going to draw more people. Some will still go and some won't, nobody knows until it's in the rearview mirror. I think the point is that hunter recruitment doesn't seem to come up much when prices are set and the trend lately seems to be in closing the gap between youth and adult prices and reducing youth draw hunts.Some people will absolutely be priced out with every increase, that is something I don't think we can deny. With all of the other things kids can do with their time, I just wonder how many more hurdles we can give them before we see an even bigger problem. There are very good reasons why fishing licenses are free for kids and the same argument holds true for hunting.
I would think most new youth hunters will be hunting in their own state so I'm not following how this has a significant impact on hunter recruitment.
If the future of hunting depends on parents taking their youth hunters out of state to hunt big game, then it's most likely not going to end well.
The future of hunting relies on recruiting new hunters. None of these changes should be considered in a vacuum. It's all part of the equation that ends up with either more hunting or less hunting.It's like saying that banning hound hunting is an ok idea because if you want to hunt bears you will find a way to make it happen and most people that hunt bears don't use hounds anyway. Banning hound hunting resulted in fewer bear hunters. Maybe a few less, maybe a lot less, but less for sure.I look at all of this stuff big picture.Anyway, that's my view. Good luck in ID or wherever you roam this fall.
Where are you guys coming up with $500 or $550 to take youth hunting in the new proposal?