TIME TO GET MOBILIZED! I-1094 petition drive to repeal I-1639

[Woodchuck]

 

[Fl0und3rz]

Bump.  Take a friend.  Sign it.

[WildlifeAssassin]

Anyone have a list or link of places this can be signed?

[Nelsonridge]

Anyone have a list or link of places this can be signed?

https://sporting-systems.us3.list-manage.com/track/click?u=b80faee8adcc8197cfb1308e6&id=a4adbda450&e=78d21034d7

[Tenkara]

Signed.

[huntnphool]

 Sportsman Warehouse in Federal Way has a tent there today.

[WildlifeAssassin]

Anyone have a list or link of places this can be signed?

https://sporting-systems.us3.list-manage.com/track/click?u=b80faee8adcc8197cfb1308e6&id=a4adbda450&e=78d21034d7

Thank you, will get it signed.

[ljsommer]

On it. I'll get it done by Monday the 23rd.

[Special T]

I took my wife into sporting systems to have her sign it. Nice shop, never been in there before. Man did they have a display of nearly every flash suppressor and brake imaginable.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

[konradcountry]

I am not one of the founders or members of the group driving this, I  just want to help spread the word. 

And why do you think the vote would be different a second time?

I'm not trying to be a jerk. I just don't see a worthwhile strategy here.

[JimmyHoffa]

I am not one of the founders or members of the group driving this, I  just want to help spread the word. 

And why do you think the vote would be different a second time?

I'm not trying to be a jerk. I just don't see a worthwhile strategy here.

Not sure the result would be different, but the margin might.  I think people in this state tend to default to the Yes vote for most initiatives.  Maybe if it was worded like the Eyeman initiatives with the "repeal this tax" (it does have an associated tax), it could get more votes. 

[konradcountry]

I am not one of the founders or members of the group driving this, I  just want to help spread the word. 

And why do you think the vote would be different a second time?

I'm not trying to be a jerk. I just don't see a worthwhile strategy here.

Not sure the result would be different, but the margin might.  I think people in this state tend to default to the Yes vote for most initiatives.  Maybe if it was worded like the Eyeman initiatives with the "repeal this tax" (it does have an associated tax), it could get more votes.

It was 60% last time which is high for a ballot initiative. The typical King/Thurston/Whatcom voter wouldn't even be able to explain what it contained.

I'm not trying to be negative. I just don't think this is going to work and we should be focused on the current gov effort of trying to ban them.