collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Investigation: Ferry County range riders were in Spokane when they were supposed  (Read 8733 times)

Offline KFhunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 34512
  • Location: NE Corner

As stated above, this was not our range rider and there is no connection to CNW.


Thanks for the clarification that these range riders under investigation was WDFW's riders, paid for by WDFW and not CNW's riders. 


Not a fan of WDFW paying for this...CNW can do what they want with their money, if they spend it range riding good for them.

Offline CGDucksandDeer

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Jul 2014
  • Posts: 84
  • Groups: cgducksanddeer

As stated above, this was not our range rider and there is no connection to CNW.


Thanks for the clarification that these range riders under investigation was WDFW's riders, paid for by WDFW and not CNW's riders. 


Not a fan of WDFW paying for this...CNW can do what they want with their money, if they spend it range riding good for them.

This might surprise you, but at this point, I fully agree. Wolves have recovered in northeast Washington, and WDFW has actual endangered or declining species to deal with. Funding for wolf conflict avoidance and removal should come from the Department of Agriculture, federal Wildlife Services, local ranches and any other organizations that choose to pitch in.

CNW currently spends $50,000 a grazing season supporting local ranches in wolf conflict avoidance, and helping them employ range riders. In past years that was approximately $80k a grazing season.

While other orgs are making headlines screaming bloody murder and filing lawsuits, we're spending serious money on the ground in Ferry, Stevens and Kittitas counties. 

Offline idahohuntr

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 3604

As stated above, this was not our range rider and there is no connection to CNW.


Thanks for the clarification that these range riders under investigation was WDFW's riders, paid for by WDFW and not CNW's riders. 


Not a fan of WDFW paying for this...CNW can do what they want with their money, if they spend it range riding good for them.

Wolves have recovered in northeast Washington, and WDFW has actual endangered or declining species to deal with. Funding for wolf conflict avoidance and removal should come from the Department of Agriculture, federal Wildlife Services, local ranches and any other organizations that choose to pitch in.

Well said, and I completely agree. 
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood..." - TR

Offline KFhunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 34512
  • Location: NE Corner

As stated above, this was not our range rider and there is no connection to CNW.


Thanks for the clarification that these range riders under investigation was WDFW's riders, paid for by WDFW and not CNW's riders. 


Not a fan of WDFW paying for this...CNW can do what they want with their money, if they spend it range riding good for them.

Wolves have recovered in northeast Washington, and WDFW has actual endangered or declining species to deal with. Funding for wolf conflict avoidance and removal should come from the Department of Agriculture, federal Wildlife Services, local ranches and any other organizations that choose to pitch in.

Well said, and I completely agree.


Me 3  :tup:


WDFW should be focusing on endangered and declining species for sure, such as mule deer, WT deer and elk...several species in decline. 

And maybe add grouse to that list, hearing a lot about turkey's and declining grouse.  Are they going to get ahead of that or wait until everyone's wondering where all the grouse went?

Offline Ridgeratt

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 5887
  • IBEW 73 (Retired) Burden on the working class.

WDFW should be focusing on endangered and declining species for sure, such as mule deer, WT deer and elk...several species in decline. 

And maybe add grouse to that list, hearing a lot about turkey's and declining grouse.  Are they going to get ahead of that or wait until everyone's wondering where all the grouse went?


 :tup: Agreed they should take a active approach before there is nothing to protect. But as stated many times before folks don't believe there will ever be a control season in this state.
« Last Edit: January 28, 2020, 01:38:55 PM by Ridgeratt »

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Leupold Display fade by Remnar
[Today at 01:13:46 PM]


506 Willapa Hills Late Season Antlerless Tag by Fast Rider
[Today at 12:48:55 PM]


Lund Fisherman 1800 info/advice by Stein
[Today at 11:46:54 AM]


Knotty duck decoys by goosegunner
[Today at 11:45:58 AM]


Public Land Sale Senate Budget Reconciliation by dwils233
[Today at 11:36:36 AM]


Pocket Carry by birdshooter1189
[Today at 09:21:42 AM]


AKC lab puppies! Born 06/10/2025 follow as they grow!!! by scottfrick
[Today at 09:21:15 AM]


Sheep Ewe - Whitestone Sheep Unit 20 by geauxtigers
[Today at 07:42:37 AM]


Any info on public land South Dakota pheasant hunts? by bornhunter
[Today at 07:19:46 AM]


Can’t fish for pinks area 8-2? by blackpowderhunter
[Today at 06:36:49 AM]


2025 Quality Chewuch Tag by Schmalzfam
[Today at 05:36:10 AM]


idaho hunt 1001 by MackDaddy509
[Yesterday at 08:37:03 PM]


Game trails to nowhere? by TitusFord
[Yesterday at 06:40:56 PM]


Drew Pogue Quality by actionshooter
[Yesterday at 06:22:02 PM]


Idaho general deer area 5. by 3nails
[Yesterday at 05:33:03 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal