Free: Contests & Raffles.
So if I’m fishing, hiking, horseback ridding, duck hunting, modern deer hunting, etc I can carry without a CPL, but as soon as I pickup a muzzleloader or a bow I have to another license? Senseless BS.
see the other side of the coin here.
None of the activities you mentioned place any restriction on the use of a firearm... having a MZ or Bow tag does place a limit on the use (or access to) a firearm.
Quotesee the other side of the coin here.Goodluck with that.
Quote from: JoshT on April 07, 2009, 10:10:53 AMNone of the activities you mentioned place any restriction on the use of a firearm... having a MZ or Bow tag does place a limit on the use (or access to) a firearm. So if I'm fishing for humpies on the Sky is it OK to shoot them with my sidearm?
When fishing for catch and release selected waters is it ok to have barbed hooks in your box?
I think the point of the law is being missed... my understanding is: Folks were worried about personal safety while in the woods with a bow... not safety from critters... but safety from Tweekers and other unruley types. The point is to allow them to be armed in the same manner as me while I'm in the South Center Mall... not to allow them to pack their .45 LC for shooting the occasional grouse. As the original law was stated... you basically were in violation of the big game statute... even if you're sole purpose for having the sidearm was because you never know who you'll run into breaking into your car while it's parked in Capitol Forrest... now at least that right has been granted (even though it should NOT BE INFRINGED). At least that's my take on the rule change.... does that make any sense?
That is a good point Josh, but I would think that it wouldn't be necessary in a game law. You should have to practice what current CW laws there are on the books. I can have a hand gun with me and still be within state guidelines.