Free: Contests & Raffles.
I hunt east and west and that was my point think its time for change
the deer herds in NE WA are a fraction of what they were. The ag areas in some areas do have quite a few does, the problem is the public land where alot of it is in the mountains away from ag and that is where the deer numbers have been wiped out
Quote from: millerwheeler on February 23, 2020, 09:07:49 PMI hunt east and west and that was my point think its time for changeI also hunt east and west but I think we are in a slim minority. The multi-season deer isn't like multi-season elk. They usually end up with otc tags for deer. I just don't see picking a side changing much for deer. The bigger problem I see is that the state doesn't care about improving deer habitat. They will log an area and then won't plant protein sources for the deer in the clearings. They will leave a bunch of scrap and let salal or blackberries grow in.
Quote from: Bango skank on February 23, 2020, 08:43:11 PMAbsolutely not. We just got rid of ALL antlerless whitetail harvest in the NE last year, even special permit, youth, disabled and senior, and for good reason. I dont know how much time you spend here, but we absolutely shouldnt have any antlerless whatsoever.Well I guess we disagree here. I just don't buy that antlerless is a problem when it is left to archery and muzzleloader. I still haven't met a west sider that runs over there to kill a doe during archery. I'd bet that more does are taken through special tags in that area. Haven't looked into it in a while but I remember that 124 had quite a few doe tags for modern.
Absolutely not. We just got rid of ALL antlerless whitetail harvest in the NE last year, even special permit, youth, disabled and senior, and for good reason. I dont know how much time you spend here, but we absolutely shouldnt have any antlerless whatsoever.
there shouldn't be any antler-less harvest right now in those units. Id be on board for no muzzy or archery antlerless harvest. They could also implement a rule like Idaho does and designate doe harvest within 1 mile of ag.
Just spikes
Region 1 (101-121) had 823 antlerless deer harvested (reported, so likely more) in 2018 on general tags. And combined with special permits 949 total does harvested (reported.) So your bet that more does are harvested on special permits is way off, you lose that bet. 823 does on general tags vs 126 does on special permits.
I don't know what truck you guys fell off of.But Friday before Saturday opener ,bumper to bump rv,four wheeler,people from the west side hit the east side it makes up a least 50 % of the hunters over here opening mourningIt's not the state craping out the habitat ,it's the spraying done after the clear cut , So now there's know cover or food there.
Quote from: Bango skank on February 24, 2020, 02:24:26 AMRegion 1 (101-121) had 823 antlerless deer harvested (reported, so likely more) in 2018 on general tags. And combined with special permits 949 total does harvested (reported.) So your bet that more does are harvested on special permits is way off, you lose that bet. 823 does on general tags vs 126 does on special permits. Well I was making my bet based on 2019 regulations. Anyways even if 124 isn't technically in the same area it still borders 117 and 121. So you have an area that could be growing bigger bucks but is any deer for a lot of groups.
Last night before dark the wife and I made a drive where normally I expect to see 75 to 200 deer, we saw only 25 deer. I'm hoping that number is different the next time I make the same check!