Free: Contests & Raffles.
Interesting. If I read the maps correctly I wonder why they didn't make a year-round season on public land in the Lolo zone (units 10 and 12).
Does that kind of hunting pressure push them to areas with less pressure, like WA for example?
One disturbing thing in the article is that among idaho residents, 55% supported this, 45% opposed. A few more years of california refugees will likely swing public sentiment the wrong way. Theyre close to the tipping point.
Quote from: Bango skank on February 21, 2020, 07:08:00 PMOne disturbing thing in the article is that among idaho residents, 55% supported this, 45% opposed. A few more years of california refugees will likely swing public sentiment the wrong way. Theyre close to the tipping point.This is true, but of that 45% I'll bet most of them are from a few isolated areas. Hopefully that'll help keep their political pressure from growing too much. Also, the wolf huggers are more likely to send in comments than the wolf hunters.
One big issue being overlooked is the F4WM, with their reimbursements there will be hunters in the woods if season is open. Bango, if you don't already belong, you should send in $35 and join before you go on your Idaho hunt. In my mind, F4WM is making the most positive impact on wolves and that lessens the overall population and the number of wolves that need to come to WA for room to fit in.