Free: Contests & Raffles.
Quote from: Chukarhead on June 01, 2020, 10:43:44 AMQuote from: birddogdad on June 01, 2020, 10:25:16 AMQuote from: blackveltbowhunter on June 01, 2020, 10:04:03 AMThey were. Maybe my reading comprehension was off, but the MINIMUM qualifications seemed very clear to me. After that came preferred experience. They assembled the pool of highly qualified based on those subjective preferences. That also seemed clear to me. After that it was luck, due to sheer volume of applicants.your stating my position.. minimum to qualify, not top 40 and lotto... based on excess info provided fact or fiction..I'm not looking for an argument here, but my understanding from the email was that the 40 applications were the result of a random draw from all qualified applications (my assumption is that the pool of qualified applications was very, very large). Those 40 pulled randomly were winnowed down to the final 21 under greater scrutiny from a collection of NPS and WDFW folks. I understand that I'm biased in this opinion, but it seems very much like Dr. Happe/NPS is doing absolutely everything reasonable people could ask of her/them in this situation. The level of information developed for the lethal removal phase and the amount of coordination required between all phases of this operation is really astounding. I've been thoroughly impressed."I evaluated all the applications, and pulled out those that were the most highly qualified. From that pool I then did a random draw of 40 applications, asked some colleagues from the NPS and WDFW to review that more restricted pool, and selected 21 groups (yes – 3 more than I originally intended)."most highly qualified and qualified are very different in meaning, again making the original submission standard criteria different than expectations …. quote directly from my email reply.. not going to argue, just stating facts here..
Quote from: birddogdad on June 01, 2020, 10:25:16 AMQuote from: blackveltbowhunter on June 01, 2020, 10:04:03 AMThey were. Maybe my reading comprehension was off, but the MINIMUM qualifications seemed very clear to me. After that came preferred experience. They assembled the pool of highly qualified based on those subjective preferences. That also seemed clear to me. After that it was luck, due to sheer volume of applicants.your stating my position.. minimum to qualify, not top 40 and lotto... based on excess info provided fact or fiction..I'm not looking for an argument here, but my understanding from the email was that the 40 applications were the result of a random draw from all qualified applications (my assumption is that the pool of qualified applications was very, very large). Those 40 pulled randomly were winnowed down to the final 21 under greater scrutiny from a collection of NPS and WDFW folks. I understand that I'm biased in this opinion, but it seems very much like Dr. Happe/NPS is doing absolutely everything reasonable people could ask of her/them in this situation. The level of information developed for the lethal removal phase and the amount of coordination required between all phases of this operation is really astounding. I've been thoroughly impressed.
Quote from: blackveltbowhunter on June 01, 2020, 10:04:03 AMThey were. Maybe my reading comprehension was off, but the MINIMUM qualifications seemed very clear to me. After that came preferred experience. They assembled the pool of highly qualified based on those subjective preferences. That also seemed clear to me. After that it was luck, due to sheer volume of applicants.your stating my position.. minimum to qualify, not top 40 and lotto... based on excess info provided fact or fiction..
They were. Maybe my reading comprehension was off, but the MINIMUM qualifications seemed very clear to me. After that came preferred experience. They assembled the pool of highly qualified based on those subjective preferences. That also seemed clear to me. After that it was luck, due to sheer volume of applicants.
I wish they would have made each group show up for a one day competition on all aspects of this hunt. Although I'm sure there were A LOT of super qualified teams, I will never believe there were 21 better qualified (Every Aspect) for this hunt that ours with the criteria given. Not too upset that we won't be getting the chance to participate, but a bit surprised.Hope this hunt gets the chance to operate fully for those selected without any unnecessary drama.
Quote from: MtnMuley on June 01, 2020, 11:54:03 AMI wish they would have made each group show up for a one day competition on all aspects of this hunt. Although I'm sure there were A LOT of super qualified teams, I will never believe there were 21 better qualified (Every Aspect) for this hunt that ours with the criteria given. Not too upset that we won't be getting the chance to participate, but a bit surprised.Hope this hunt gets the chance to operate fully for those selected without any unnecessary drama. and I'd want them to sell tickets to that comp so I could watch! That would be some entertainment
Quote from: Karl Blanchard on June 01, 2020, 11:56:09 AMQuote from: MtnMuley on June 01, 2020, 11:54:03 AMI wish they would have made each group show up for a one day competition on all aspects of this hunt. Although I'm sure there were A LOT of super qualified teams, I will never believe there were 21 better qualified (Every Aspect) for this hunt that ours with the criteria given. Not too upset that we won't be getting the chance to participate, but a bit surprised.Hope this hunt gets the chance to operate fully for those selected without any unnecessary drama. and I'd want them to sell tickets to that comp so I could watch! That would be some entertainment We could always show up at the trailheads opening day with Inslee shirts and protest those goat killers