collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Swarovski BTX?  (Read 1639 times)

Offline The scout

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 1823
  • Location: belfair
Swarovski BTX?
« on: April 14, 2020, 03:28:26 PM »
Looking at upgrading my spotter, anybody have one I’m looking at the BTX 85. Is it as awesome as it seems like it would be?

Offline jjhunter

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 2258
  • Location: Mule Deer Country
  • Aim small. Miss small.
Re: Swarovski BTX?
« Reply #1 on: April 14, 2020, 04:00:21 PM »
In the right country, they are amazing.  I’ve had a BTX 95 for a couple of years; game changer for sure.  I wouldn’t buy one without the 95mm objective though. 

I’ve got the STX, BTX and 65/95mm objectives and am equipped to battle any landscape.  If you can swing it, I’d recommend that set-up.

Offline jjhunter

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 2258
  • Location: Mule Deer Country
  • Aim small. Miss small.
Re: Swarovski BTX?
« Reply #2 on: April 14, 2020, 04:02:20 PM »
I also have the 1.7x extender which I have never used in 2 years.  Might save yourself the $300 if you were thinking about it.


Offline The scout

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 1823
  • Location: belfair
Re: Swarovski BTX?
« Reply #3 on: April 14, 2020, 04:37:28 PM »
Hmm I guess it is worth the extra 300 to go to the 95 it’s only 9 oz heavier to.

Offline BKMFR

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+25)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2011
  • Posts: 546
  • Location: Eastern WA.
  • Groups: WSF-Life member, F4WM, ITA, RMEF, MDF, ABF-Life member
Re: Swarovski BTX?
« Reply #4 on: April 19, 2020, 12:28:04 PM »
I have the same set-up as jjhunter, but use the extender all the time, it really is amazing when setup with 20-60 eyepiece and 95 obj when digiscoping…. have used many different tripods because of the weight of the unit, but keep going back to Outdoorsman when having to pack, Slik when not packing. Slik works good, just heavy, have used Slik for Doctor 30x80's for years before Swarovski BTX came out....
You won't beat the Swarovski BTX IMO.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Last year putting in… by Broomd
[Today at 10:42:13 PM]


Knight ridge runner by riverrun
[Today at 09:47:51 PM]


Anybody breeding meat rabbit? by jackelope
[Today at 08:54:26 PM]


1oz cannon balls by hookr88
[Today at 07:40:51 PM]


Best/Preferred Scouting App by MADMAX
[Today at 06:57:28 PM]


Any info on public land South Dakota pheasant hunts? by follow maggie
[Today at 05:27:14 PM]


Oregon spring bear by Twispriver
[Today at 04:32:22 PM]


Search underway for three missing people after boat sinks near Mukilteo by Platensek-po
[Today at 01:59:06 PM]


Desert Sheds by MADMAX
[Today at 11:25:33 AM]


Nevada Results by cem3434
[Today at 11:18:49 AM]


Sportsman’s Muzzloader Selection by VickGar
[Yesterday at 09:20:43 PM]


Vantage Bridge by jackelope
[Yesterday at 08:03:05 PM]


wyoming pronghorn draw by 87Ford
[Yesterday at 07:35:40 PM]


Wyoming elk who's in? by go4steelhd
[Yesterday at 03:25:16 PM]


New to ML-Optics help by Threewolves
[Yesterday at 02:55:25 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal