collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: 10x42 vs 12x50 binos  (Read 3692 times)

Offline Bobby Bowman

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Jul 2018
  • Posts: 10
10x42 vs 12x50 binos
« on: June 14, 2020, 01:33:26 PM »
I want to upgrade my Nikon Monarch 7 10x42 binoculars... Looking at Vortex Razor UHD 10x42 or 12x50. What are people's experiences with 12x50 binos? I plan on getting a tripod for them, but is it too much magnification for just hand use? I also don't have a spotting scope so i'm hoping the 12x50 might be a good bridge. Am i making a mistake leaning towards 12x50???? I bow hunt and rife hunt.  Thanks!! 

Offline ShaneTyTrey

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2012
  • Posts: 1752
  • Location: Richland, Wa
  • Is there anything better than hunting?
Re: 10x42 vs 12x50 binos
« Reply #1 on: June 14, 2020, 02:04:45 PM »
You will have people say the 12x50 is the only way to go and others that will say absolutely stay away.  You need to go to the store and play with them and think what makes the most since for your style of hunting.  Running them for too long of a period without a Tri-pod can become difficult but honestly so can 10x42.  Glassing off a tripod is just way better and easier.  I personally run the Razor 10x42 HDs and have the 18x56 UHD for Tri-pod work, but I have considered giving the 10x42s to my kid and trying to run the 12x50 UHD in my harness.

Good luck, there really isn’t a right or wrong answer on this one, it is what is best for you.  As I also have both the Razor Gen 1 65MM and Gen 2 85 MM spotters that come along at times too.  Just have to play around as different hunts require different optics combos.  Good luck!
Cascade Life Member Washington Wild Sheep Foundation.
Life Member Idaho Wild Sheep Foundation.
Life Member Montana Wild Sheep Foundation.
Life Member Arizona Desert Bighorn Sheep Society.

Offline Crunchy

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 4930
  • Location: Puyallup
Re: 10x42 vs 12x50 binos
« Reply #2 on: June 14, 2020, 02:08:40 PM »
You will have people say the 12x50 is the only way to go and others that will say absolutely stay away.  You need to go to the store and play with them and think what makes the most since for your style of hunting.  Running them for too long of a period without a Tri-pod can become difficult but honestly so can 10x42.  Glassing off a tripod is just way better and easier.  I personally run the Razor 10x42 HDs and have the 18x56 UHD for Tri-pod work, but I have considered giving the 10x42s to my kid and trying to run the 12x50 UHD in my harness.

Good luck, there really isn’t a right or wrong answer on this one, it is what is best for you.  As I also have both the Razor Gen 1 65MM and Gen 2 85 MM spotters that come along at times too.  Just have to play around as different hunts require different optics combos.  Good luck!

For me 12s are too much to free hand for any period of time.  If you wanted an all around pair of say archery, muzzleloader and rifle season I would do 10s.  12s are too much when you are in the timber.  I have 12s, and looking for 8s for archery season.  I do love my 12s when it is rifle deer season, but that is mostly using a tripod or seated and using my pack. 

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21733
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: 10x42 vs 12x50 binos
« Reply #3 on: June 14, 2020, 02:45:31 PM »
Interesting question. I have a pair of alpha glass 10x42s that I've used for many years. Last year I bought a pair of 12x50s and have had occasion to take both binos on several hunts. The 10x are smaller, lighter, and have a greater field of view. There have been a few occasions where I could see game with the 12x that I couldn't with the 10x. I'm glad to have both but if I had to choose one it would be the 10x42s. :twocents:
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline DJ_Mack

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Mar 2014
  • Posts: 295
  • Location: Everett
Re: 10x42 vs 12x50 binos
« Reply #4 on: June 14, 2020, 02:58:05 PM »
If you are only looking at UHD’s then go 12x50. Two reasons, each lineup has specific bino that outshines the rest. In the UHD’s it is the 12x50’s (that came directly from Vortex to me). The second, the 10x42’s are larger than regular hd razors anyways, so if you are worried about offhanding the binos, the 10x42’s are by far larger than 10x42 HD razors.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The beauty of the Second Amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it.

If you stand for nothing, you will fall for anything.

Offline Pegasus

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2017
  • Posts: 2112
  • Location: King County
Re: 10x42 vs 12x50 binos
« Reply #5 on: June 14, 2020, 03:06:34 PM »
If you bow hunt stick with the 10x42. You don't need a tripod, just wear it on your chest. You still have room to shoot your bow while wearing the binos. The 12X50  might be too big for that.

Offline Magnum_Willys

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 5597
Re: 10x42 vs 12x50 binos
« Reply #6 on: June 14, 2020, 03:51:27 PM »
If you carry a spotter then 10x42   .  No spotter I would go 12x50.  But swaro doesn’t have l
The less expensive  12x50 if looking there   

Offline andrew_in_idaho

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2015
  • Posts: 1275
  • Location: Nampa, ID
  • Groups: RMEF
Re: 10x42 vs 12x50 binos
« Reply #7 on: June 15, 2020, 07:19:29 AM »
12x50, I’m guessing you wear a ball cap while hunting, stabilize them by putting a couple fingers over the bill of your cap when you don’t have them on your tripod. Problem solved


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline OltHunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 460
Re: 10x42 vs 12x50 binos
« Reply #8 on: June 15, 2020, 07:31:24 AM »
Glassing from a tripod is a game changer.  My vote is 12x50.  You will see more game.  Then you have some decent 10x42 if you will only be in timber, then some nicer glass 12x for the long distance stuff.

10x42 don't really make sense to use a tripod with.  Like others said, they will excel in timber, but I rarely use them in timber situations (maybe i should more!).

12x free hand does have some shake, you will probably always need to have a couple points of contact, whether that's holding onto the bill of a hat, or sitting down, elbows to knees.

I did free hand glass up deer last season without any points of contact from about 1/2 mile away so it's not terrible.  You just wouldn't want to do it for a long time.

Offline mburrows

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 1618
  • Location: Montana
  • Go Cougs!
Re: 10x42 vs 12x50 binos
« Reply #9 on: June 15, 2020, 08:34:24 AM »
For everyday use id go 10x42. As noted 12x's are tough to focus with off hand. 10x42 on a tripod will find you a lot of game and i dont think 12's will ever find you anything that 10's couldnt have.

Preference deal though.  :twocents:

Offline Bobby Bowman

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Jul 2018
  • Posts: 10
Re: 10x42 vs 12x50 binos
« Reply #10 on: June 16, 2020, 04:28:58 PM »
Thanks for the input. I got the 12’s! I’m excited to get them on a tripod and hopefully we find some deer!

Offline lamrith

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2014
  • Posts: 2161
  • Location: Tacoma, WA
    • https://www.facebook.com/pelletpeddler/
    • Pellet Peddler LLC
Re: 10x42 vs 12x50 binos
« Reply #11 on: June 16, 2020, 05:32:53 PM »
Quite a bit of the decision will hinge on your intended usage.  Here in W WA 12x50 is not going to be super useful.  Easter, or if you travel to hunt to open areas like AZ, they are very useful.  I will mirror others, 12x50 will be too much to hold and use.  Sure some people might pull it off, but it is difficult at best and just not enjoyable for the amount of time you typically would be behind such strong glass.

12x50 will be lighter than a spotter, and they are easier to look thru for extended periods (two eyes vs one), so if the magnification of 12x is enough I say go for it, but keep your 10's for hand use.

12x50 on a tripod were a game changer for me on my last Coues hunt in AZ.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Last year putting in… by wa.hunter
[Yesterday at 11:02:00 PM]


HUNTNNW 2025 trail cam thread and photos by huntnnw
[Yesterday at 10:34:36 PM]


Resetting dash warning lights by HUNTINCOUPLE
[Yesterday at 09:57:43 PM]


alkali elk special hunt by Rainier10
[Yesterday at 09:17:12 PM]


Wyoming elk who's in? by Ghost Hunter
[Yesterday at 08:56:09 PM]


Oregon Seed #'s by Brute
[Yesterday at 08:54:20 PM]


What's flatbed pickup life like? by Happy Gilmore
[Yesterday at 08:38:50 PM]


Idaho General Season Going to Draw for Nonresidents by baldopepper
[Yesterday at 08:08:06 PM]


The time clock has started.....and go. by KNOPHISH
[Yesterday at 07:31:05 PM]


Please Report Problems & Bugs Here by Rainier10
[Yesterday at 07:23:55 PM]


Colorado Results by vandeman17
[Yesterday at 02:29:43 PM]


Burrowing Animal by b0bbyg
[Yesterday at 12:43:47 PM]


Cold bore or fouled barrel. by hunter399
[Yesterday at 12:36:22 PM]


DIY Ucluelet trip by CP
[Yesterday at 05:48:15 AM]


Oregon spring bear by time2hunt
[May 27, 2025, 08:03:28 PM]


WDFW falsely advertising preference points by hunter399
[May 27, 2025, 04:38:43 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal