collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: MT evidence of sex  (Read 3974 times)

Offline ibuyre

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: May 2015
  • Posts: 122
  • Location: Olympia Wa
  • Groups: NRA, SAF
Re: MT evidence of sex
« Reply #15 on: September 13, 2020, 09:47:07 PM »
Sounds like they're copying Wyoming regulations.

That's standard in Wy. Talked to a couple game wardens there and they both recommended. Boning out all meat at kill site and proof of sex, and the tail to show if it was a white tail or mule deer in a zip lock with your punched tag. And to keep that zip lock with your boned out meat. I hunted in Wy and then stopped on the way home and hunted a Mt tag and stopped at a couple Mt check stations. I was a little nervous having a pair of antelope and a couple deer in the freezer from WY. With the zip locks, with sex and tail and tag. They just shrugged and "yep, that's the Wyoming way".

I think it's a great system and a great way to do it. Really clean and nice, and easy for a hunter that's packing things out. I mean. Come on really.... someone's going to have a tail and proof of sex from something other than what the meat is from.... The whole prof of sex naturally attached is a PIA and BS for guys that are hunting in the back country, boning out and packing meat. It's something that should be changed. I like how Wy does it. Sounds like Mt and is going that way as well. Sure be nice is Wa did as well.

Offline callturner

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2020
  • Posts: 757
  • Location: nine mile falls Washington
    • n/a
  • Groups: nra
Re: MT evidence of sex
« Reply #16 on: September 13, 2020, 10:36:18 PM »
That's evidence of sex, I'm trying to find the requirement for evidence of species.

Subject says evidence of sex!

Offline Stein

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 12895
  • Location: Arlington
Re: MT evidence of sex
« Reply #17 on: September 22, 2020, 11:06:55 AM »
I just heard back from a MT Warden, "Currently, there in not a requirement or a burden on the hunter for proof of species. "

Surprised me, but no complaints as that makes my life easier and meat cleaner.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Last year putting in… by Broomd
[Today at 10:42:13 PM]


Knight ridge runner by riverrun
[Today at 09:47:51 PM]


Anybody breeding meat rabbit? by jackelope
[Today at 08:54:26 PM]


1oz cannon balls by hookr88
[Today at 07:40:51 PM]


Best/Preferred Scouting App by MADMAX
[Today at 06:57:28 PM]


Any info on public land South Dakota pheasant hunts? by follow maggie
[Today at 05:27:14 PM]


Oregon spring bear by Twispriver
[Today at 04:32:22 PM]


Search underway for three missing people after boat sinks near Mukilteo by Platensek-po
[Today at 01:59:06 PM]


Desert Sheds by MADMAX
[Today at 11:25:33 AM]


Nevada Results by cem3434
[Today at 11:18:49 AM]


Sportsman’s Muzzloader Selection by VickGar
[Yesterday at 09:20:43 PM]


Vantage Bridge by jackelope
[Yesterday at 08:03:05 PM]


wyoming pronghorn draw by 87Ford
[Yesterday at 07:35:40 PM]


Wyoming elk who's in? by go4steelhd
[Yesterday at 03:25:16 PM]


New to ML-Optics help by Threewolves
[Yesterday at 02:55:25 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal