collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: MT evidence of sex  (Read 5034 times)

Offline ibuyre

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: May 2015
  • Posts: 122
  • Location: Olympia Wa
  • Groups: NRA, SAF
Re: MT evidence of sex
« Reply #15 on: September 13, 2020, 09:47:07 PM »
Sounds like they're copying Wyoming regulations.

That's standard in Wy. Talked to a couple game wardens there and they both recommended. Boning out all meat at kill site and proof of sex, and the tail to show if it was a white tail or mule deer in a zip lock with your punched tag. And to keep that zip lock with your boned out meat. I hunted in Wy and then stopped on the way home and hunted a Mt tag and stopped at a couple Mt check stations. I was a little nervous having a pair of antelope and a couple deer in the freezer from WY. With the zip locks, with sex and tail and tag. They just shrugged and "yep, that's the Wyoming way".

I think it's a great system and a great way to do it. Really clean and nice, and easy for a hunter that's packing things out. I mean. Come on really.... someone's going to have a tail and proof of sex from something other than what the meat is from.... The whole prof of sex naturally attached is a PIA and BS for guys that are hunting in the back country, boning out and packing meat. It's something that should be changed. I like how Wy does it. Sounds like Mt and is going that way as well. Sure be nice is Wa did as well.

Offline callturner

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2020
  • Posts: 762
  • Location: nine mile falls Washington
    • n/a
  • Groups: nra
Re: MT evidence of sex
« Reply #16 on: September 13, 2020, 10:36:18 PM »
That's evidence of sex, I'm trying to find the requirement for evidence of species.

Subject says evidence of sex!

Offline Stein

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 13094
  • Location: Arlington
Re: MT evidence of sex
« Reply #17 on: September 22, 2020, 11:06:55 AM »
I just heard back from a MT Warden, "Currently, there in not a requirement or a burden on the hunter for proof of species. "

Surprised me, but no complaints as that makes my life easier and meat cleaner.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Idaho Non-Res draw results by scottfrick
[Today at 09:40:34 PM]


Know Where To Hunt Club by Remnar
[Today at 09:14:39 PM]


Idaho Trapping Journal 2025/26 by TeacherMan
[Today at 08:54:27 PM]


Dodge trucks by b23
[Today at 08:13:53 PM]


Idaho on the verge of outlawing by kodiak06
[Today at 08:04:06 PM]


Idaho deer 2026. Let’s go!! by TeacherMan
[Today at 07:36:50 PM]


Special vs. Regular Pronghorn in WY by furbearer365
[Today at 07:36:43 PM]


Charcuterie by Fletch
[Today at 07:11:50 PM]


Prince of Wales Spring Bear 2026 by jrebel
[Today at 07:09:47 PM]


Washington Wild Sheep Foundation Banquet by Falcon
[Today at 07:04:19 PM]


Idaho's new Deer/Elk License System by andrew_in_idaho
[Today at 04:38:36 PM]


Duck Hunting Land Trust by knob221
[Today at 03:06:36 PM]


Tikka 7prc by HereDuckyDucky
[Today at 02:48:34 PM]


Swap Saltwater fishing for private ground hunting by washingtonmuley
[Today at 02:40:14 PM]


Define Wide by b23
[Today at 01:18:24 PM]


Cowiche Quality Buck by Face72
[Today at 12:25:28 PM]


EuroOptic by Webfoot
[Today at 11:20:32 AM]


It's now a buyer's market by pianoman9701
[Today at 11:15:20 AM]


Tease 'l' by kellama2001
[Today at 08:09:41 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal