Free: Contests & Raffles.
I'll note from the article WA has 14% of packs involved in livestock depredations compared to a 20% average in the Rockies. With WA doing better then average it seems unlikely there is much room for improvement.
I can't decide if Inslee's actions and inactions are through incompetence or maliciousness. He and is ilk have become intolerable. Culp is the real deal. Research him. Inslee has refused to debate Culp. Blaming covid.Also look up "restore washington".This initiative would limit a governor to 14 days after declaring an emergency and then the legislature would decide on validity of emergency decree. Iniative would be too late to rein in Inslee but would hold the next clown accountable. Initiative 1114, we need 330,000 signatures.
Quote from: Loup Loup on September 04, 2020, 08:45:09 PMI can't decide if Inslee's actions and inactions are through incompetence or maliciousness. He and is ilk have become intolerable. Culp is the real deal. Research him. Inslee has refused to debate Culp. Blaming covid.Also look up "restore washington".This initiative would limit a governor to 14 days after declaring an emergency and then the legislature would decide on validity of emergency decree. Iniative would be too late to rein in Inslee but would hold the next clown accountable. Initiative 1114, we need 330,000 signatures.Political pandering to King, Pierce, Clark and Thurston Co.s. Plain and simple. And "simple" is a great adjective for Dimslee.
Quote from: pianoman9701 on September 05, 2020, 11:18:02 AMQuote from: Loup Loup on September 04, 2020, 08:45:09 PMI can't decide if Inslee's actions and inactions are through incompetence or maliciousness. He and is ilk have become intolerable. Culp is the real deal. Research him. Inslee has refused to debate Culp. Blaming covid.Also look up "restore washington".This initiative would limit a governor to 14 days after declaring an emergency and then the legislature would decide on validity of emergency decree. Iniative would be too late to rein in Inslee but would hold the next clown accountable. Initiative 1114, we need 330,000 signatures.Political pandering to King, Pierce, Clark and Thurston Co.s. Plain and simple. And "simple" is a great adjective for Dimslee.I edited your statement for you.... (It hurts to be lumped with King Co)
Quote from: Curly on September 05, 2020, 11:51:14 AMQuote from: pianoman9701 on September 05, 2020, 11:18:02 AMQuote from: Loup Loup on September 04, 2020, 08:45:09 PMI can't decide if Inslee's actions and inactions are through incompetence or maliciousness. He and is ilk have become intolerable. Culp is the real deal. Research him. Inslee has refused to debate Culp. Blaming covid.Also look up "restore washington".This initiative would limit a governor to 14 days after declaring an emergency and then the legislature would decide on validity of emergency decree. Iniative would be too late to rein in Inslee but would hold the next clown accountable. Initiative 1114, we need 330,000 signatures.Political pandering to King, Pierce, Clark and Thurston Co.s. Plain and simple. And "simple" is a great adjective for Dimslee.I edited your statement for you.... (It hurts to be lumped with King Co) We're a fairly conservative county, surprisingly so for a bedroom of PDX.
Our thoughts and analysis on this surprising and disappointing move, for anyone that wants a take from an in-state group (as opposed to the out-of-state petitioners/litigants). https://www.capitalpress.com/ag_sectors/livestock/inslee-mirrors-environmental-groups-on-wolf-removal/article_7d1ab6e2-f1fa-11ea-bb89-fb96f9351908.htmlhttps://www.conservationnw.org/news-updates/governor-requests-rule-making-on-wolf-management/Our biggest concern is whether new rules at the Governor’s request will create backlash and a lower acceptance of implementing non-lethal measures. More than a decade of effort has gone into collaborative uptake of conflict avoidance efforts in Washington wolf territory, including five years of working under the current WAG framework to develop the existing Protocol (with improved range riding expectations about to be finalized.) The work of getting rancher acceptance and implementation of high-quality deterrence measures on-the-ground is expensive and time consuming. We question whether a regulations-based approach will get better results than the current approach of WAG-negotiated protocols, which provide the WDFW Director discretion to wait to use lethal removal beyond the prescribed thresholds until more attempts at non-lethal measures have been tried, as well as provide the ranching and agricultural community ownership of non-lethal conflict avoidance measures.In short, we’re with the Farm Bureau and many others on the WAG with concerns about this. This move caves to hardline zealots from AZ, CO and OR and undermines years of constructive collaboration through the WAG and on the ground in Eastern Washington. But I’m sure Ribka or WolfBait will be on here momentarily talking about conservationist wolves-in-sheeps clothing, or something like that. If I don’t reply, I’ve “disappeared” for the High Hunt.