collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: MT evidence of sex  (Read 5346 times)

Offline ibuyre

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: May 2015
  • Posts: 122
  • Location: Olympia Wa
  • Groups: NRA, SAF
Re: MT evidence of sex
« Reply #15 on: September 13, 2020, 09:47:07 PM »
Sounds like they're copying Wyoming regulations.

That's standard in Wy. Talked to a couple game wardens there and they both recommended. Boning out all meat at kill site and proof of sex, and the tail to show if it was a white tail or mule deer in a zip lock with your punched tag. And to keep that zip lock with your boned out meat. I hunted in Wy and then stopped on the way home and hunted a Mt tag and stopped at a couple Mt check stations. I was a little nervous having a pair of antelope and a couple deer in the freezer from WY. With the zip locks, with sex and tail and tag. They just shrugged and "yep, that's the Wyoming way".

I think it's a great system and a great way to do it. Really clean and nice, and easy for a hunter that's packing things out. I mean. Come on really.... someone's going to have a tail and proof of sex from something other than what the meat is from.... The whole prof of sex naturally attached is a PIA and BS for guys that are hunting in the back country, boning out and packing meat. It's something that should be changed. I like how Wy does it. Sounds like Mt and is going that way as well. Sure be nice is Wa did as well.

Offline callturner

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2020
  • Posts: 763
  • Location: nine mile falls Washington
    • n/a
  • Groups: nra
Re: MT evidence of sex
« Reply #16 on: September 13, 2020, 10:36:18 PM »
That's evidence of sex, I'm trying to find the requirement for evidence of species.

Subject says evidence of sex!

Offline Stein

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 13136
  • Location: Arlington
Re: MT evidence of sex
« Reply #17 on: September 22, 2020, 11:06:55 AM »
I just heard back from a MT Warden, "Currently, there in not a requirement or a burden on the hunter for proof of species. "

Surprised me, but no complaints as that makes my life easier and meat cleaner.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Now we wait(Montana) by Magnum_Willys
[Today at 09:35:21 PM]


Hunter saves deer's life -Cool vid by Kingofthemountain83
[Today at 06:58:54 PM]


Discretion !!! by Kingofthemountain83
[Today at 03:45:03 PM]


MA10 Blackmouth anyone? by fishngamereaper
[Today at 03:40:06 PM]


Sky Rover Binoculars. Alpha glass, bargain price. by highside74
[Today at 11:59:25 AM]


Youth turkey season 2026 by muleyslayer
[Today at 09:08:31 AM]


Breaking news: Lorna Smith and WWF sue WDFW Director and Deputy Director by HikerHunter
[Today at 08:28:14 AM]


Offseason blues by C-Money
[Today at 08:03:51 AM]


2025/2026 trapper reports by greenhead_killer
[Yesterday at 08:31:23 PM]


Turkey Vest Recommendations? by shorthair15
[Yesterday at 06:18:40 PM]


20Ga Load Testing - Need different shells by shorthair15
[Yesterday at 06:17:05 PM]


Holy Smokes what a shock!! by shorthair15
[Yesterday at 06:13:26 PM]


Bucket List Elk shed help wanted by Mtnwalker
[Yesterday at 03:34:29 PM]


Wall Tents Tips and Tricks by ghosthunter
[Yesterday at 02:54:36 PM]


Your biggest spike elk by kodiak06
[Yesterday at 02:37:09 PM]


New Zealand in May by Mr Mykiss
[Yesterday at 11:22:52 AM]


Multi season draw odds by hughjorgan
[Yesterday at 09:42:13 AM]


Springer season getting close, who's going by MLhunter1
[Yesterday at 09:36:10 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal