collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: MT Legislature passes bill favoring hunters that use Outfitters  (Read 6398 times)

Offline Wanttohuntmore

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 1975
Re: MT Legislature passes bill favoring hunters that use Outfitters
« Reply #15 on: April 30, 2021, 09:40:52 AM »
Might be a loss to the state with less DIY hunters spending money there in multiple trips.   Typically guided hunters go for a single,  short trip.  Sad about this as we have friends there that we like to hunt with.

Offline jrebel

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+25)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2008
  • Posts: 11531
  • Location: East Wenatchee
Re: MT Legislature passes bill favoring hunters that use Outfitters
« Reply #16 on: April 30, 2021, 09:43:38 AM »
I guess I fundamentally don't see the problem with it.  Yeah, it is gonna lessen the tags for DIY out of state folks but it is what it is.  If you don't like it you should move to Montana and become a resident. 

To each their own I guess.....but it would be like me getting pissed off at my neighbor because he leases his land to hunting vs just letting me hunt it for free.   :dunno:

Offline bearpaw

  • Family, Friends, Outdoors
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 38898
  • Location: Idaho<->Colville
  • "Rather Be Cougar Huntin"
    • http://www.facebook.com/DaleDenney
    • Bearpaw Outfitters
  • Groups: NRA, SCI, F4WM, NWTF, IOGA, MOGA, CCOC, BBB, RMEF, WSTA, WSB
Re: MT Legislature passes bill favoring hunters that use Outfitters
« Reply #17 on: April 30, 2021, 09:55:14 AM »
The fact is that outfitters used to have a share of tags for many years until residents voted to eliminate them, I think the primary motivation was to get access to land that outfitters had leased. When that passed it eliminated the $1000.00 deer tags that outfitter clients paid which greatly helped support FWP, as a result they nearly doubled the price of regular non-res tags to make up for the budget shortfall. This legislation doesn't replace the quota outfitters used to have but it will help many businesses.

Just remember when you write the check for your non-resident Montana tags, the reason you are paying so much is because the much more expensive outfitter tags were eliminated!  :twocents:
Americans are systematically advocating, legislating, and voting away each others rights. Support all user groups & quit losing opportunity!

http://bearpawoutfitters.com Guided Hunts, Unguided, & Drop Camps in Idaho, Montana, Utah, and Wash. Hunts with tags available (no draw needed) for spring bear, fall bear, bison, cougar, elk, mule deer, turkey, whitetail, & wolf! http://trophymaps.com DIY Hunting Maps are also offered

Offline kselkhunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2014
  • Posts: 1658
  • Location: United States
Re: MT Legislature passes bill favoring hunters that use Outfitters
« Reply #18 on: April 30, 2021, 10:05:41 AM »
The fact is that outfitters used to have a share of tags for many years until residents voted to eliminate them, I think the primary motivation was to get access to land that outfitters had leased. When that passed it eliminated the $1000.00 deer tags that outfitter clients paid and that greatly helped support FWP and nearly doubled the price of regular non-res tags to make up for the budget shortfall. This legislation doesn't replace the quota outfitters used to have but it will help many businesses.

Just remember when you write the check for your non-resident Montana tags, the reason you are paying so much is because the much more expensive outfitter tags were eliminated!  :twocents:

The residents repealed it last time.  They forced the bill writer to remove references to it this time, then it was snuck in again at the last second so it couldn't go through public review again.  It will likely get repealed again by residents.   
 

Offline Karl Blanchard

  • Trade Count: (+24)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 10706
  • Location: Selah, WA
  • Jonathan_S hunting apparel prostaff
  • Groups: Sitka Gear Fan Boy for LIFE
It is foolish and wrong to mourn these men.  Rather, we should thank god that such men lived.  -General George S. Patton

Aaron's Profile:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;u=2875
Aaron's Posts:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=2875
Aaron's Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/aaron.blanchard.94

Offline whacker1

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 5816
  • Location: Spokane
Re: MT Legislature passes bill favoring hunters that use Outfitters
« Reply #20 on: May 24, 2021, 10:00:33 AM »
The fact is that outfitters used to have a share of tags for many years until residents voted to eliminate them, I think the primary motivation was to get access to land that outfitters had leased. When that passed it eliminated the $1000.00 deer tags that outfitter clients paid which greatly helped support FWP, as a result they nearly doubled the price of regular non-res tags to make up for the budget shortfall. This legislation doesn't replace the quota outfitters used to have but it will help many businesses.

Just remember when you write the check for your non-resident Montana tags, the reason you are paying so much is because the much more expensive outfitter tags were eliminated!  :twocents:

i remember this from prior.  and then when MT FWP wasn't selling out the tags,  access to tags was a non-issue for outfitters, but that changed when people got money in there pocket again and demand increased over time for the non-resident tags.

Offline Stein

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 13174
  • Location: Arlington
Re: MT Legislature passes bill favoring hunters that use Outfitters
« Reply #21 on: May 24, 2021, 10:23:14 AM »
Kind of forgot about this but Governor signed it.


https://www.gohunt.com/read/news/montana-changes-outfitter-hunting-license-allocation-and-preference-point-system?utm_source=Klaviyo_campaign&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Newsletter%2005%2F23%2F21%20-%20ALL%20%282021-05-24%29&_ke=eyJrbF9jb21wYW55X2lkIjogIlBrUG1KRiIsICJrbF9lbWFpbCI6ICJrYXJsLmJsYW5jaGFyZDgzQHlhaG9vLmNvbSJ9#gs.25ujlr

Great, the buy two point genie was just let out of the bottle.  I wouldn't be surprised to see more states get creative here, they can raise more revenue without touching the tag price.  With the huge number of applicants, just a few bucks more from each one adds up to a bunch more money.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Selkirk bull moose. by Turner89
[Today at 08:06:36 PM]


Real world feedback needed: Rangefinder Binos by actionshooter
[Today at 08:06:20 PM]


Idaho deer question by Tbob
[Today at 08:02:15 PM]


The Okanogan Deer Book by Ridgerunner
[Today at 07:56:42 PM]


Best service for estimating draw odds by actionshooter
[Today at 07:50:29 PM]


Cowichie muzzy bull this year by Kingofthemountain83
[Today at 07:43:52 PM]


2025 elk success thread!! by 10thmountainarcher
[Today at 07:21:33 PM]


Diarrhea ? by Knocker of rocks
[Today at 06:39:31 PM]


Old recessed buck by boneaddict
[Today at 06:29:16 PM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by Kingofthemountain83
[Today at 06:19:55 PM]


Big Bull Elk Hit On Hwy 970? by Roslyn Rambler
[Today at 06:19:23 PM]


My wife found her first shed by NOCK NOCK
[Today at 05:18:09 PM]


Perfect evening hunt by bearhunter99
[Today at 05:16:50 PM]


WA Bucket List….Mule Deer Permit by huntnphool
[Today at 04:44:02 PM]


White River late archery by trophyhunt
[Today at 04:23:56 PM]


Long distance love affair by boneaddict
[Today at 03:37:45 PM]


5 Points......(mule deer or blacktails) by boneaddict
[Today at 02:46:16 PM]


Dash cams by CP
[Today at 12:44:52 PM]


Nevada bull hunt 2025 by bearhunter99
[Today at 11:04:37 AM]


Eastern Washington Late Archery by teal101
[Today at 10:43:36 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal