collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: MT Legislature passes bill favoring hunters that use Outfitters  (Read 5978 times)

Offline Wanttohuntmore

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 1957
Re: MT Legislature passes bill favoring hunters that use Outfitters
« Reply #15 on: April 30, 2021, 09:40:52 AM »
Might be a loss to the state with less DIY hunters spending money there in multiple trips.   Typically guided hunters go for a single,  short trip.  Sad about this as we have friends there that we like to hunt with.

Offline jrebel

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+24)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2008
  • Posts: 11332
  • Location: East Wenatchee
Re: MT Legislature passes bill favoring hunters that use Outfitters
« Reply #16 on: April 30, 2021, 09:43:38 AM »
I guess I fundamentally don't see the problem with it.  Yeah, it is gonna lessen the tags for DIY out of state folks but it is what it is.  If you don't like it you should move to Montana and become a resident. 

To each their own I guess.....but it would be like me getting pissed off at my neighbor because he leases his land to hunting vs just letting me hunt it for free.   :dunno:

Offline bearpaw

  • Family, Friends, Outdoors
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 38496
  • Location: Idaho<->Colville
  • "Rather Be Cougar Huntin"
    • http://www.facebook.com/DaleDenney
    • Bearpaw Outfitters
  • Groups: NRA, SCI, F4WM, NWTF, IOGA, MOGA, CCOC, BBB, RMEF, WSTA, WSB
Re: MT Legislature passes bill favoring hunters that use Outfitters
« Reply #17 on: April 30, 2021, 09:55:14 AM »
The fact is that outfitters used to have a share of tags for many years until residents voted to eliminate them, I think the primary motivation was to get access to land that outfitters had leased. When that passed it eliminated the $1000.00 deer tags that outfitter clients paid which greatly helped support FWP, as a result they nearly doubled the price of regular non-res tags to make up for the budget shortfall. This legislation doesn't replace the quota outfitters used to have but it will help many businesses.

Just remember when you write the check for your non-resident Montana tags, the reason you are paying so much is because the much more expensive outfitter tags were eliminated!  :twocents:
Americans are systematically advocating, legislating, and voting away each others rights. Support all user groups & quit losing opportunity!

http://bearpawoutfitters.com Guided Hunts, Unguided, & Drop Camps in Idaho, Montana, Utah, and Wash. Hunts with tags available (no draw needed) for spring bear, fall bear, bison, cougar, elk, mule deer, turkey, whitetail, & wolf! http://trophymaps.com DIY Hunting Maps are also offered

Offline kselkhunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2014
  • Posts: 1631
  • Location: United States
Re: MT Legislature passes bill favoring hunters that use Outfitters
« Reply #18 on: April 30, 2021, 10:05:41 AM »
The fact is that outfitters used to have a share of tags for many years until residents voted to eliminate them, I think the primary motivation was to get access to land that outfitters had leased. When that passed it eliminated the $1000.00 deer tags that outfitter clients paid and that greatly helped support FWP and nearly doubled the price of regular non-res tags to make up for the budget shortfall. This legislation doesn't replace the quota outfitters used to have but it will help many businesses.

Just remember when you write the check for your non-resident Montana tags, the reason you are paying so much is because the much more expensive outfitter tags were eliminated!  :twocents:

The residents repealed it last time.  They forced the bill writer to remove references to it this time, then it was snuck in again at the last second so it couldn't go through public review again.  It will likely get repealed again by residents.   
 

Offline Karl Blanchard

  • Trade Count: (+24)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 10655
  • Location: Selah, WA
  • Jonathan_S hunting apparel prostaff
  • Groups: Sitka Gear Fan Boy for LIFE
It is foolish and wrong to mourn these men.  Rather, we should thank god that such men lived.  -General George S. Patton

Aaron's Profile:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;u=2875
Aaron's Posts:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=2875
Aaron's Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/aaron.blanchard.94

Offline whacker1

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 5816
  • Location: Spokane
Re: MT Legislature passes bill favoring hunters that use Outfitters
« Reply #20 on: May 24, 2021, 10:00:33 AM »
The fact is that outfitters used to have a share of tags for many years until residents voted to eliminate them, I think the primary motivation was to get access to land that outfitters had leased. When that passed it eliminated the $1000.00 deer tags that outfitter clients paid which greatly helped support FWP, as a result they nearly doubled the price of regular non-res tags to make up for the budget shortfall. This legislation doesn't replace the quota outfitters used to have but it will help many businesses.

Just remember when you write the check for your non-resident Montana tags, the reason you are paying so much is because the much more expensive outfitter tags were eliminated!  :twocents:

i remember this from prior.  and then when MT FWP wasn't selling out the tags,  access to tags was a non-issue for outfitters, but that changed when people got money in there pocket again and demand increased over time for the non-resident tags.

Offline Stein

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 12936
  • Location: Arlington
Re: MT Legislature passes bill favoring hunters that use Outfitters
« Reply #21 on: May 24, 2021, 10:23:14 AM »
Kind of forgot about this but Governor signed it.


https://www.gohunt.com/read/news/montana-changes-outfitter-hunting-license-allocation-and-preference-point-system?utm_source=Klaviyo_campaign&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Newsletter%2005%2F23%2F21%20-%20ALL%20%282021-05-24%29&_ke=eyJrbF9jb21wYW55X2lkIjogIlBrUG1KRiIsICJrbF9lbWFpbCI6ICJrYXJsLmJsYW5jaGFyZDgzQHlhaG9vLmNvbSJ9#gs.25ujlr

Great, the buy two point genie was just let out of the bottle.  I wouldn't be surprised to see more states get creative here, they can raise more revenue without touching the tag price.  With the huge number of applicants, just a few bucks more from each one adds up to a bunch more money.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Archery elk gear, 2025. by hughjorgan
[Yesterday at 10:36:56 PM]


Herring anyone? by CastleRocker
[Yesterday at 09:42:53 PM]


Go kill some dogs! by fowl smacker
[Yesterday at 09:22:42 PM]


Leupold Display fade by JWBINX
[Yesterday at 08:17:29 PM]


38% increase in fishing and hunting licenses by bigtex
[Yesterday at 08:05:03 PM]


49 degrees north late Moose tag by Buzzsaw461
[Yesterday at 07:52:24 PM]


E scouting for bears by Candcrods
[Yesterday at 07:32:06 PM]


Game trails to nowhere? by NOCK NOCK
[Yesterday at 07:22:02 PM]


Minimum post count needed to view classifieds by Hucci
[Yesterday at 06:43:35 PM]


Pocket Carry by Sakko300wsm
[Yesterday at 05:11:59 PM]


Survey in ? by hdshot
[Yesterday at 03:12:07 PM]


Encouraging on e side by hdshot
[Yesterday at 02:54:51 PM]


506 Willapa Hills Late Season Antlerless Tag by Fast Rider
[Yesterday at 12:48:55 PM]


Lund Fisherman 1800 info/advice by Stein
[Yesterday at 11:46:54 AM]


Knotty duck decoys by goosegunner
[Yesterday at 11:45:58 AM]


Public Land Sale Senate Budget Reconciliation by dwils233
[Yesterday at 11:36:36 AM]


AKC lab puppies! Born 06/10/2025 follow as they grow!!! by scottfrick
[Yesterday at 09:21:15 AM]


Sheep Ewe - Whitestone Sheep Unit 20 by geauxtigers
[Yesterday at 07:42:37 AM]


Any info on public land South Dakota pheasant hunts? by bornhunter
[Yesterday at 07:19:46 AM]


Can’t fish for pinks area 8-2? by blackpowderhunter
[Yesterday at 06:36:49 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal