collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: The person running the Bureau of Land Management Should Not be an Eco-Terrorist  (Read 5954 times)

Offline downtownbrown0610

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: May 2019
  • Posts: 75
  • Location: Pierce County, WA
  • Groups: MDF, FLRD
I was reading up on this whole thing the other day. I do not agree with this at all. It is also very unnerving to me the amount of people that are willing to look past something like this. I always give people the benefit of the doubt, but to me this is not ok. I am not one for discussing politics or partisan issues but you cant tell me this is the best person we could come up with!?!? Do I think that she honestly cares about the administering of federal lands and their proper use? yes probably. Do I think that there is another agenda at play? 100% absolutely. Give an inch and they will take a mile. We do not have many more inches to give......
First In Last Out!

Offline jstone

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2009
  • Posts: 6573
Talent= they can hire whoever they want qualified or not.

Offline WAcoyotehunter

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 4457
  • Location: Pend Oreille County
I don't give her a pass for spiking trees

With so many well qualified people, I expect the best, not these people with baggage.

And I don't care right or left, nominees should be spotless
To be clear- she didn't spike trees...she testified in a case that got others charged with spiking trees.

I agree that nominees should be a good fit, no one is spotless.  IMO she is an improvement over Pendley, but maybe not 100% perfect.  I think she will be good for hunters though.

Offline KFhunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 34512
  • Location: NE Corner
I don't give her a pass for spiking trees

With so many well qualified people, I expect the best, not these people with baggage.

And I don't care right or left, nominees should be spotless
To be clear- she didn't spike trees...she testified in a case that got others charged with spiking trees.

I agree that nominees should be a good fit, no one is spotless.  IMO she is an improvement over Pendley, but maybe not 100% perfect.  I think she will be good for hunters though.
Not going to argue as I can't do anything about it anyway, but I do hope you're right.


Offline KFhunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 34512
  • Location: NE Corner
Federal taxes, and inflation

Offline ribka

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 5647
  • Location: E side
  • That's what she said
I agree with her politics so matter what crimes she committed I support and  anyways Trump is to blame. The leader at conservation NW is also a self admitted eco terrorist and I imagine Mitch is a close friend of hers as they were members in the same terrorist organization.

She has zero experience running and managing a large organization but her left wing radical politics makes her unquestionably qualified to manage our public lands. She could not even qualify for a basic background clearance because of her terrorist ties and that would exclude her from many entry level govt jobs. . This is such crazy logic but normal these days. Just like BHA leadership pushing gun bans to help back country hunters.

talk about cognitive dissonance.  :chuckle: :chuckle:


I’m not sure sending a letter on someone else’s behalf makes her a terrorist.

Maybe just an eco-terrorist sympathizer ?

It was probably forgivable 20 years ago....she was an undergrad at UM when all this went down in the late 80's... she's not exactly an eco terrorist.
« Last Edit: July 12, 2021, 10:17:12 AM by ribka »

Offline Platensek-po

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2018
  • Posts: 1512
  • Location: Shelton, wa
I agree with her politics so matter what crimes she committed I support and  anyways Trump is to blame. The leader at conservation NW is also a self admitted eco terrorist and I imagine Mitch is a close friend of hers as they were members in the same terrorist organization.

She has zero experience running and managing a large organization but her left wing radical politics makes her unquestionably qualified to manage our public lands. She could not even qualify for a basic background clearance because of her terrorist ties and that would exclude her from many entry level govt jobs. . This is such crazy logic but normal these days. Just like BHA leadership pushing gun bans to help back country hunters.

talk about cognitive dissonance.  :chuckle: :chuckle:


I’m not sure sending a letter on someone else’s behalf makes her a terrorist.

Maybe just an eco-terrorist sympathizer ?

It was probably forgivable 20 years ago....she was an undergrad at UM when all this went down in the late 80's... she's not exactly an eco terrorist.

Do you actually have evidence of BHA supporting gun bans? Would like to see that.
“Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary.”

If you are not willing to die for freedom then take the word out of your vocabulary.

Offline KFhunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 34512
  • Location: NE Corner
BHA, or the leadership involved with BHA?

Offline Platensek-po

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2018
  • Posts: 1512
  • Location: Shelton, wa
BHA, or the leadership involved with BHA?

Either I guess. I would like to see what initiatives they have put forth or statements they have made to show they are against gun ownership.
“Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary.”

If you are not willing to die for freedom then take the word out of your vocabulary.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Opening morning by Kingofthemountain83
[Today at 11:54:41 AM]


KODIAK06 2025 trail cam and personal pics thread by Dan-o
[Today at 11:04:45 AM]


Willapa Hills 1 Bear by catdog
[Today at 10:30:44 AM]


Best 20 degree and under sleeping bags? by Ricochet
[Today at 08:24:08 AM]


Get out the Band-Aids and streri strips by chukarchaser
[Today at 08:09:27 AM]


Montana general deer by andrew_in_idaho
[Today at 08:01:26 AM]


Any Rec Tec users here ? by BA Mongor
[Today at 07:43:22 AM]


Happy opening day! by Bearhunter308
[Yesterday at 10:43:37 PM]


Bowfishing on the Snake River by Machias
[Yesterday at 09:11:19 PM]


Mamma's and babies by Brute
[Yesterday at 08:38:48 PM]


Pinks! by Stein
[Yesterday at 08:20:08 PM]


Rats in RV roof by Ghost Hunter
[Yesterday at 07:37:01 PM]


Muckleshoot/white river forest hunting permits by bigtex
[Yesterday at 05:21:47 PM]


Looks like it may get wet by ghosthunter
[Yesterday at 04:46:17 PM]


Bait punishment? by hdshot
[Yesterday at 04:35:54 PM]


small bears by Threewolves
[Yesterday at 02:59:35 PM]


Montana Antelope Draw by Jimmy33
[Yesterday at 02:41:41 PM]


Pork belly street tacos….. by jrebel
[Yesterday at 10:03:22 AM]


M1 garand info needed by Farmer72
[Yesterday at 07:35:34 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal