collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: WDFW Spring Bear 2022 cancelled!  (Read 67795 times)

Offline trophyhunt

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 19532
  • Location: Wetside
  • Groups: Wa Wild Sheep Life Member
Re: Response from a "NO" vote, Lorna Smith
« Reply #210 on: November 22, 2021, 03:42:46 PM »
Contact the Commission link - https://wdfw.wa.gov/about/commission/contact
sent message!  Wasn’t rude but I’m sure I’ll never draw another special permit for anything, not that I was either way.
“In common with”..... not so much!!

Offline KFhunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 34512
  • Location: NE Corner
Re: Response from a "NO" vote, Lorna Smith
« Reply #211 on: November 22, 2021, 03:48:44 PM »
I sit on a board and if I don't see the information that I want to see in front of me to support or reject a proposal my default is not to vote no. I will suggest to my fellow board members that we table the proposal or motion and direct staff to produce the information that I want to see before further consideration. It seems like that might have been a reasonable option for this commissioner if she's really all about the science backing the decision.

They threw WDFW bio information out, all the hard work and best science their funding would allow

For once WDFW was not the enemy here and I find myself defending them. 

The council made up BS excuses and reasons, asked for unrealistic studies using unproven means and worse made false correlations in the data.   


Offline saylean

  • Team Slayer Packmule
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2007
  • Posts: 8380
  • Location: Stanwood
Re: Response from a "NO" vote, Lorna Smith
« Reply #212 on: November 22, 2021, 04:22:37 PM »
Her statement of,  “  So while the argument is strong that spring hunting of bears as they emerge from hibernation when they are thin, starving, lethargic and less able to avoid threats violates the hunting ethics of fair chase, in my opinion,  that is simply the underpinning of my vote against a spring bear hunt…” proves a preconditional bias against bear hunting. Since the ethics of the hunt were not in question, and her vote was based to some degree upon this, her vote should be immediately discounted and she should be then removed from the committee.

Offline KFhunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 34512
  • Location: NE Corner
Re: Response from a "NO" vote, Lorna Smith
« Reply #213 on: November 22, 2021, 04:25:13 PM »
Inslee is root of all these problems, he would appoint someone else just like her.

Offline Sitka_Blacktail

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 3391
  • Location: Hoquiam, WA
Re: Response from a "NO" vote, Lorna Smith
« Reply #214 on: November 22, 2021, 04:25:34 PM »
Lorna Smith is their Executive Director. That should provide insight into her perspective.

http://westernwildlife.org/

This link doesn't work Bob, FYI.

Worked for me. And here is an interesting quote from their website considering Smith's vote and her reasoning.......   " Today, in Washington it is still extremely rare to encounter a grizzly bear, but black bear populations are stable and healthy." 

So their organization believes the black bear population is "Stable and Healthy" under current management, but she's voting against opportunity because she basically doesn't believe any of the data given to her.  I call BS and I believe there is no information that could be presented to her that would cause her to change her vote.  She is an anti hunt plant, period.
A man who fears suffering is already suffering from what he fears. ~ Michel de Montaigne

Offline hughjorgan

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2010
  • Posts: 2414
  • Location: Wilbur
Re: Response from a "NO" vote, Lorna Smith
« Reply #215 on: November 22, 2021, 04:27:13 PM »
Inslee is root of all these problems, he would appoint someone else just like her.

It will probably be the idiot carpenter that he replaces next

Offline dwils233

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2012
  • Posts: 589
  • Location: Spokane County
Re: Response from a "NO" vote, Lorna Smith
« Reply #216 on: November 22, 2021, 04:45:27 PM »

For once WDFW was not the enemy here and I find myself defending them. 


This can't be overstated. Call out the agency when it's in the wrong, but on this they were in the right and backed it up with evidence. Pressure only needs to be applied to the commission. If anything we should be grateful to the department and Susewind for putting up the fight they did
A promise made is a debt unpaid, and the trail has its own stern code

Offline idahohuntr

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 3602
Re: Response from a "NO" vote, Lorna Smith
« Reply #217 on: November 22, 2021, 05:55:13 PM »

For once WDFW was not the enemy here and I find myself defending them. 


This can't be overstated. Call out the agency when it's in the wrong, but on this they were in the right and backed it up with evidence. Pressure only needs to be applied to the commission. If anything we should be grateful to the department and Susewind for putting up the fight they did
:yeah:

Probably best to email the Governor and key legislators noting how poorly Lorna treated state staff and that she is unfit to serve.
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood..." - TR

Offline trophyhunt

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 19532
  • Location: Wetside
  • Groups: Wa Wild Sheep Life Member
Re: Response from a "NO" vote, Lorna Smith
« Reply #218 on: November 22, 2021, 06:27:06 PM »
Agree, the lady who I talked to today was pissed at some of those commisioners, she said we need to send emails that will become public record. She also thinks with lots of backlash we could get spring bear next year.  I asked about points and she said they have been getting a lot of questions on those but don’t know what they are going to do yet. At least we have half of Wdfw on our side on this one, after talking w her, I have hope for next year.
“In common with”..... not so much!!

Offline johnaferrera

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Feb 2015
  • Posts: 8
  • Location: everett Wa.
  • Groups: rmef, mdf
Re: Response from a "NO" vote, Lorna Smith
« Reply #219 on: November 22, 2021, 07:09:53 PM »
Everyone needs to contact the commission and complain about the lack of using science based wildlife management over certain commissioners social agendas.

Offline saylean

  • Team Slayer Packmule
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2007
  • Posts: 8380
  • Location: Stanwood
Re: Response from a "NO" vote, Lorna Smith
« Reply #220 on: November 22, 2021, 07:55:26 PM »
I have requested all emails from the wdfw to the commission and GMAC as well as all text messages and any and all online comments for or against the spring bear hunt, via the freedom of information act.
Once received I will do a file dump if possible.

Offline Griiz

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 661
  • Location: Puget Sound
  • Groups: RMEF
Re: Response from a "NO" vote, Lorna Smith
« Reply #221 on: November 22, 2021, 08:17:52 PM »
I have requested all emails from the wdfw to the commission and GMAC as well as all text messages and any and all online comments for or against the spring bear hunt, via the freedom of information act.
Once received I will do a file dump if possible.

Thank You

Offline highcountry_hunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2010
  • Posts: 721
Re: WDFW Commission Meeting Regarding Spring Bear Seasons This Morning
« Reply #222 on: November 22, 2021, 08:25:47 PM »
One thing that hasn’t been mentioned about this whole tie vote debacle, there is supposed to be 9 commission members. The 9th member, who is supposed to be a representative of eastern Washington, has yet to be elected or appointed. And as said before, a handful of the current commission members have yet to be sworn in. In my opinion they shouldn’t be able to make major changes until the board has been filled and all sworn in.

Offline Mr Mykiss

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 1833
Re: Response from a "NO" vote, Lorna Smith
« Reply #223 on: November 22, 2021, 09:01:01 PM »
I have requested all emails from the wdfw to the commission and GMAC as well as all text messages and any and all online comments for or against the spring bear hunt, via the freedom of information act.
Once received I will do a file dump if possible.
That’s my boy!!
It is hard to follow one great vision in a world of darkness and of many changing shadows. Among these shadows men get lost.
-Black Elk

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 25032
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: WDFW Commission Meeting Regarding Spring Bear Seasons This Morning
« Reply #224 on: November 22, 2021, 09:12:15 PM »
One thing that hasn’t been mentioned about this whole tie vote debacle, there is supposed to be 9 commission members. The 9th member, who is supposed to be a representative of eastern Washington, has yet to be elected or appointed. And as said before, a handful of the current commission members have yet to be sworn in. In my opinion they shouldn’t be able to make major changes until the board has been filled and all sworn in.

2 rcw are in violation. Perhaps more.  Not only are locations important  but stake holders. KOONTZ replaced the comerical fishermans reb Bob Kehoe. Now you maybor not care for the com fishery group but Kehoe was a strong supporter of hunters.  Carpenter is over his term length, and it seems ran for Mount Vernon City Council. Since he lost it matters not but if he won would be in elligable for the comission. We have a vacant seat. Smith and Koontz are not confirmed by the state senate. And yet get to make decisions as if they were. Why did the natural resources committee  in the senate not hold confermation votes? Kevin  VAN deWeg  is a HSUS senator of the year many times over and chairmen of the committee.  Its not like Inslee and Van DeWedge are on different  political pages.... so why would that be?
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal