collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: 2022 Hunting proposals adopted by the commission  (Read 13219 times)

Offline time2hunt

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2010
  • Posts: 2779
  • Location: Ellensburg
Re: 2022 Hunting proposals adopted by the commission
« Reply #30 on: April 14, 2022, 06:11:01 PM »
What a crook of monkey !!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Local 3482

Offline Pinetar

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2010
  • Posts: 1635
Re: 2022 Hunting proposals adopted by the commission
« Reply #31 on: April 14, 2022, 06:36:47 PM »
I’m going to apologize in advance. *censored* our governor and *censored* our commission!!! I’m already in for this year but it will be my last in this state!
      I will take that bet :chuckle:

Offline Houndhunter

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 3022
  • Location: Continental Divide
Re: 2022 Hunting proposals adopted by the commission
« Reply #32 on: April 14, 2022, 06:58:37 PM »
What we need is a Blue Dog to run, it's the only hope in this state I'm afraid.  After the Rossi election it became pretty clear that there is little chance of anyone with an R next to their name winning.

The only other person that could fit that bill is past state senator Dean Takko,  but I'm less versed  in positions outside of hunting.  I do know that Blake was well respected by the republicans on the natural resources comittie.

Dean Takko would be a great candidate as far as democrats go. He's a big time hunter.

Offline TriggerMike

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2014
  • Posts: 2190
  • Location: Central WA
Re: 2022 Hunting proposals adopted by the commission
« Reply #33 on: April 15, 2022, 10:24:14 AM »
So they're now saying the Yakima elk herd is at or slightly above objective  :dunno: :dunno: :chuckle:

They increased cow tags in the Yakima units but decreased the bull permits. What could possibly be responsible for bull numbers to decrease while cows increase  :bash: :bash: :bash:

Offline kirkl

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 2722
  • Location: Somewhere
  • USN Veteran- USS Nimitz CVN 68
Re: 2022 Hunting proposals adopted by the commission
« Reply #34 on: April 15, 2022, 10:35:11 AM »
So they're now saying the Yakima elk herd is at or slightly above objective  :dunno: :dunno: :chuckle:

They increased cow tags in the Yakima units but decreased the bull permits. What could possibly be responsible for bull numbers to decrease while cows increase  :bash: :bash: :bash:
The two or three years of only giving out 20 cow tags brought the herd back to objective lol. He did say they did a good flyover in february so maybe they havent done that in a couple years prior? who knows.

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39197
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: 2022 Hunting proposals adopted by the commission
« Reply #35 on: April 15, 2022, 10:40:13 AM »
I wonder if the jerky businesses are doing well?

Offline dreamingbig

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 2812
  • Location: Mukilteo, WA
Re: 2022 Hunting proposals adopted by the commission
« Reply #36 on: April 15, 2022, 11:30:15 AM »
So they're now saying the Yakima elk herd is at or slightly above objective  :dunno: :dunno: :chuckle:

They increased cow tags in the Yakima units but decreased the bull permits. What could possibly be responsible for bull numbers to decrease while cows increase  :bash: :bash: :bash:
Shooting bulls is “trophy hunting”!   Duh! 

But to be serious, it makes no sense.  The 25% reduction in quality archery elk tags was not addressed at the meetings.  Not sure what WDFW is driving at other than perhaps knowing a lot of bulls are being taken by other user groups so hoping to get bull to cow ratio back inline?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
@mukbowhunt
Avid Bowhunter
Maxxis 35 / Trykon XL

Offline elkchaser54

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2014
  • Posts: 410
  • Location: Western Washington
Re: 2022 Hunting proposals adopted by the commission
« Reply #37 on: April 17, 2022, 10:51:00 AM »
They cut doe and buck tags in the blue mountains even though the white tail populations aren't hurting in any way. It makes no sense

Offline Stein

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 12925
  • Location: Arlington
Re: 2022 Hunting proposals adopted by the commission
« Reply #38 on: April 17, 2022, 10:54:56 AM »
So they're now saying the Yakima elk herd is at or slightly above objective  :dunno: :dunno: :chuckle:

They increased cow tags in the Yakima units but decreased the bull permits. What could possibly be responsible for bull numbers to decrease while cows increase  :bash: :bash: :bash:
Shooting bulls is “trophy hunting”!   Duh! 

But to be serious, it makes no sense.  The 25% reduction in quality archery elk tags was not addressed at the meetings.  Not sure what WDFW is driving at other than perhaps knowing a lot of bulls are being taken by other user groups so hoping to get bull to cow ratio back inline?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Has to be.  Like everything WDFW, there is as little transparency as possible.  I can't think of any reason to do this other than the bull/cow ratio is incredibly bad.

Offline Tbar

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+26)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 3038
  • Location: Whatcom county
Re: 2022 Hunting proposals adopted by the commission
« Reply #39 on: April 17, 2022, 12:40:37 PM »
So they're now saying the Yakima elk herd is at or slightly above objective  :dunno: :dunno: :chuckle:

They increased cow tags in the Yakima units but decreased the bull permits. What could possibly be responsible for bull numbers to decrease while cows increase  :bash: :bash: :bash:
Shooting bulls is “trophy hunting”!   Duh! 

But to be serious, it makes no sense.  The 25% reduction in quality archery elk tags was not addressed at the meetings.  Not sure what WDFW is driving at other than perhaps knowing a lot of bulls are being taken by other user groups so hoping to get bull to cow ratio back inline?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Do you have any info or just throwing out a theory? What are the ratios? Is there a concern? Are they below 12?

Offline Stein

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 12925
  • Location: Arlington
Re: 2022 Hunting proposals adopted by the commission
« Reply #40 on: April 17, 2022, 12:45:00 PM »
WDFW survey in 2021 had the bull ratio at 25% in the Blues.  Like many things WDFW, we get to guess at the motives as transparency isn't warranted.

Offline Tbar

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+26)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 3038
  • Location: Whatcom county
Re: 2022 Hunting proposals adopted by the commission
« Reply #41 on: April 17, 2022, 12:49:09 PM »
So they're now saying the Yakima elk herd is at or slightly above objective  :dunno: :dunno: :chuckle:

They increased cow tags in the Yakima units but decreased the bull permits. What could possibly be responsible for bull numbers to decrease while cows increase  :bash: :bash: :bash:
Shooting bulls is “trophy hunting”!   Duh! 

But to be serious, it makes no sense.  The 25% reduction in quality archery elk tags was not addressed at the meetings.  Not sure what WDFW is driving at other than perhaps knowing a lot of bulls are being taken by other user groups so hoping to get bull to cow ratio back inline?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Has to be.  I can't think of any reason to do this other than the bull/cow ratio is incredibly bad.
Without knowing more than I witnessed at the feed lots, I see zero representation for this move.   :dunno: This is a reduction coming off of a 90+% reduction!  It screams naive or a lack of due diligence.  With it being above objective ( :dunno:) there was probably some flexibility to have a considerable bump in bull hunt but without clarity it leaves users guessing.  The entirety does not sit well.

Offline Tbar

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+26)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 3038
  • Location: Whatcom county
Re: 2022 Hunting proposals adopted by the commission
« Reply #42 on: April 17, 2022, 12:51:40 PM »
WDFW survey in 2021 had the bull ratio at 25% in the Blues.  Like many things WDFW, we get to guess at the motives as transparency isn't warranted.
All of the measurables in the blues signify a collapse.  The commission has shown both a willingness and seeming desire for this.

Offline dreamingbig

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 2812
  • Location: Mukilteo, WA
Re: 2022 Hunting proposals adopted by the commission
« Reply #43 on: April 17, 2022, 02:40:49 PM »
So they're now saying the Yakima elk herd is at or slightly above objective  :dunno: :dunno: :chuckle:

They increased cow tags in the Yakima units but decreased the bull permits. What could possibly be responsible for bull numbers to decrease while cows increase  :bash: :bash: :bash:
Shooting bulls is “trophy hunting”!   Duh! 

But to be serious, it makes no sense.  The 25% reduction in quality archery elk tags was not addressed at the meetings.  Not sure what WDFW is driving at other than perhaps knowing a lot of bulls are being taken by other user groups so hoping to get bull to cow ratio back inline?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Has to be.  I can't think of any reason to do this other than the bull/cow ratio is incredibly bad.
Without knowing more than I witnessed at the feed lots, I see zero representation for this move.   :dunno: This is a reduction coming off of a 90+% reduction!  It screams naive or a lack of due diligence.  With it being above objective ( :dunno:) there was probably some flexibility to have a considerable bump in bull hunt but without clarity it leaves users guessing.  The entirety does not sit well.
I don’t think it was justified.  I have zero rationale for why they did it…. My guess was low bull to cow ratio.  Why else would they slash bull permits when herd is approaching objective again?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
@mukbowhunt
Avid Bowhunter
Maxxis 35 / Trykon XL

Offline Stein

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 12925
  • Location: Arlington
Re: 2022 Hunting proposals adopted by the commission
« Reply #44 on: April 17, 2022, 02:44:46 PM »
WDFW survey in 2021 had the bull ratio at 25% in the Blues.  Like many things WDFW, we get to guess at the motives as transparency isn't warranted.
All of the measurables in the blues signify a collapse.  The commission has shown both a willingness and seeming desire for this.

Hard to argue that, numbers crashing and they increase cow tags.  Probably lots of local politics at play, but again, we get to guess.  Their own total abundance numbers show fewer elk than at least back to 2005.  Yearly calf numbers crashing too.

 


* Advertisement

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal